• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

开发机器学习算法,使用全膝关节置换术的基线特征、术前和手术因素来预测患者满意度。

The development of machine learning algorithms that can predict patients satisfaction using baseline characteristics, and preoperative and operative factors of total knee arthroplasty.

机构信息

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, South Korea.

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, South Korea.

出版信息

Knee. 2023 Oct;44:253-261. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2023.08.018. Epub 2023 Sep 11.

DOI:10.1016/j.knee.2023.08.018
PMID:37703604
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Patient satisfaction following primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a crucial part to evaluate the success of the procedure. The purpose of this study was to develop to predict patient satisfaction following TKA.

METHODS

Satisfaction outcome data after 435 consecutive conventional TKAs performed between August 2020 and December 2021 were retrospectively collected. The total 26 input data were collected. The most favorable algorithm was first found using logistic regression (LR) and machine learning (ML) algorithms. To evaluate the predictive performance of the models, both area under curve (AUC) and F1-score were used as the primary metrics. The shapley additive explanations (SHAP) feature explanation in XGBoost and LR analysis were performed to interpret the model.

RESULTS

The performance of extreme gradient boosting classifier (XGBoost) was only higher than that of conventional LR in AUC (0.782 vs. 0.689). Comparing the F-1 score, only XGBoost showed better performance than LR (0.857 vs. 0.800). The most predictive feature in XGBoost was Short Form-36 physical and mental component summary scores (SF-36 MCS), followed by Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) pain, Bone mineral density (BMD). In the LR analysis, lumbar spine disease, WOMAC pain, and BMD were statistically significant.

CONCLUSION

XGboost showed the best performance and was superior to conventional LR in the prediction of patient satisfaction after TKA. The SF-36 MCS was the most important feature in the ML model. WOMAC pain and BMD were meaningful variables and demonstrated a linear relationship with satisfaction in both the LR and ML models.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Retrospective cohort study; Level of evidence 3.

摘要

背景

初次全膝关节置换术(TKA)后患者满意度是评估手术成功的关键指标。本研究旨在建立 TKA 后患者满意度的预测模型。

方法

回顾性收集了 2020 年 8 月至 2021 年 12 月期间 435 例连续行常规 TKA 患者的满意度随访资料。共采集 26 个输入数据。首先使用逻辑回归(LR)和机器学习(ML)算法寻找最有利的算法。为了评估模型的预测性能,使用曲线下面积(AUC)和 F1 评分作为主要指标。在 XGBoost 和 LR 分析中进行了 SHAP 特征解释,以解释模型。

结果

极端梯度提升分类器(XGBoost)的性能仅在 AUC 方面高于传统 LR(0.782 比 0.689)。比较 F1 评分,只有 XGBoost 优于 LR(0.857 比 0.800)。XGBoost 中最具预测性的特征是 36 项简明健康调查问卷(SF-36 MCS),其次是西部安大略省和麦克马斯特大学骨关节炎指数(WOMAC)疼痛、骨密度(BMD)。在 LR 分析中,腰椎疾病、WOMAC 疼痛和 BMD 具有统计学意义。

结论

XGBoost 在 TKA 后患者满意度预测方面的表现优于传统 LR,其性能最佳。SF-36 MCS 是 ML 模型中最重要的特征。WOMAC 疼痛和 BMD 是有意义的变量,在 LR 和 ML 模型中均与满意度呈线性关系。

证据水平

回顾性队列研究;证据水平 3。

相似文献

1
The development of machine learning algorithms that can predict patients satisfaction using baseline characteristics, and preoperative and operative factors of total knee arthroplasty.开发机器学习算法,使用全膝关节置换术的基线特征、术前和手术因素来预测患者满意度。
Knee. 2023 Oct;44:253-261. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2023.08.018. Epub 2023 Sep 11.
2
Can Machine-learning Algorithms Predict Early Revision TKA in the Danish Knee Arthroplasty Registry?机器学习算法能否预测丹麦膝关节置换登记处的早期翻修 TKA?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2020 Sep;478(9):2088-2101. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000001343.
3
A new prediction model for patient satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty and the roles of different scoring systems: a retrospective cohort study.一种用于全膝关节置换术后患者满意度的新预测模型及不同评分系统的作用:一项回顾性队列研究。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2021 May 20;16(1):329. doi: 10.1186/s13018-021-02469-4.
4
The rate and predictors of patient satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty are influenced by the focus of the question: a standard satisfaction question is required.全膝关节置换术后患者满意度的比率和预测因素受问题重点的影响:需要一个标准的满意度问题。
Bone Joint J. 2018 Jun 1;100-B(6):740-748. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.100B6.BJJ-2017-1292.R1.
5
Logistic Regression and Machine Learning Models Cannot Discriminate Between Satisfied and Dissatisfied Total Knee Arthroplasty Patients.逻辑回归和机器学习模型无法区分满意和不满意的全膝关节置换患者。
J Arthroplasty. 2022 Feb;37(2):267-273. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2021.10.017. Epub 2021 Nov 2.
6
Asynchronous Bilateral Total Knee Arthroplasty: Predictors of the Functional Outcome and Patient Satisfaction for the Second Knee Replacement.同期双侧全膝关节置换术:对第二膝关节置换术的功能结果和患者满意度的预测因素。
J Arthroplasty. 2019 Dec;34(12):2950-2956. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2019.06.056. Epub 2019 Jul 2.
7
Development of Machine Learning Algorithms to Predict Patient Dissatisfaction After Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty.机器学习算法在预测初次全膝关节置换术后患者满意度中的开发。
J Arthroplasty. 2020 Nov;35(11):3117-3122. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2020.05.061. Epub 2020 Jun 1.
8
Is there a Threshold Preoperative WOMAC Score That Predicts Patient Satisfaction after Total Knee Arthroplasty?术前 WOMAC 评分是否存在阈值可预测全膝关节置换术后患者满意度?
J Knee Surg. 2021 Jul;34(8):846-852. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-3401826. Epub 2019 Dec 12.
9
The WOMAC score can be reliably used to classify patient satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty.WOMAC 评分可用于可靠地对全膝关节置换术后患者满意度进行分类。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2018 Nov;26(11):3333-3341. doi: 10.1007/s00167-018-4879-5. Epub 2018 Feb 26.
10
Can Preoperative Patient-reported Outcome Measures Be Used to Predict Meaningful Improvement in Function After TKA?术前患者报告的结局指标能否用于预测全膝关节置换术后功能的显著改善?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017 Jan;475(1):149-157. doi: 10.1007/s11999-016-4770-y.

引用本文的文献

1
A development of machine learning models to preoperatively predict insufficient clinical improvement after total knee arthroplasty.一种用于术前预测全膝关节置换术后临床改善不足的机器学习模型的开发。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2025 Aug 20;20(1):778. doi: 10.1186/s13018-025-06206-z.
2
Determining patient activity goals and their fulfillment following total knee arthroplasty: Findings from the prospective, observational SuPeR Knee study.全膝关节置换术后患者活动目标的确定及其达成情况:前瞻性观察性研究SuPeR Knee的结果
PLoS One. 2025 Jan 24;20(1):e0317205. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0317205. eCollection 2025.
3
Artificial intelligence in planned orthopaedic care.
计划中的骨科护理中的人工智能
SICOT J. 2024;10:49. doi: 10.1051/sicotj/2024044. Epub 2024 Nov 21.
4
Predicting patient reported outcome measures: a scoping review for the artificial intelligence-guided patient preference predictor.预测患者报告的结局指标:人工智能引导的患者偏好预测器的范围综述
Front Artif Intell. 2024 Nov 5;7:1477447. doi: 10.3389/frai.2024.1477447. eCollection 2024.