Department of Surgery, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah.
Department of Surgery, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah.
J Surg Res. 2024 Jan;293:37-45. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2023.07.054. Epub 2023 Sep 11.
The American College of Surgeons has developed evidence-based guidelines to triage the care of severely injured children to Level 1 and 2 trauma centers. Undertriage is the treatment of patients at facilities not equipped to treat the patient's injuries appropriately. We sought to evaluate the association between patient and hospital characteristics and secondary undertriage in children after major trauma.
We performed a retrospective cohort study using the 2019 Nationwide Emergency Department Sample. Patients aged less than 18 y were included if they presented to a Level 3 or nontrauma center (NTC) and were diagnosed with a traumatic injury with an injury severity score >15 based on International Classification of Diseases 10 codes. Our primary outcome was secondary undertriage, defined as inpatient admission to a Level 3 or NTC. We developed generalized linear models with inverse-probability survey weighting to determine the association between patient and hospital characteristics and the primary outcome.
Of 6572 weighted patients, 982 (15%) were undertriaged. Undertriage was significantly associated with older age (13 versus 7, P value < 0.001), metropolitan location (86% versus 68%, P < 0.001), and major abdominal injuries (19% versus 11%, P = 0.011). After multivariable adjustment, secondary undertriage was significantly associated with patients aged 6-10 y (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 2.47, P = 0.002) compared to patients aged 15-17 y, penetrating injury (aOR: 1.70, P = 0.011), major chest injury (aOR: 2.10, P = 0.014), and presentation at a teaching hospital (aOR: 5.66, P < 0.001).
After major trauma, a significant proportion of children are secondarily undertriaged at teaching NTCs. Level 1 and 2 trauma centers must partner with lower-level trauma centers to ensure children receive equitable care.
美国外科医师学会制定了循证指南,以便将严重受伤儿童的护理分诊至 1 级和 2 级创伤中心。分诊不足是指在没有适当治疗患者损伤的设备的医疗机构对患者进行治疗的情况。我们试图评估患者和医院特征与儿童重大创伤后二次分诊不足之间的关系。
我们使用 2019 年全国急诊部样本进行了回顾性队列研究。如果患者年龄小于 18 岁,在三级或非创伤中心就诊,并根据国际疾病分类第 10 版代码诊断为创伤评分 >15 的创伤性损伤,则将其纳入研究。我们的主要结局是二次分诊不足,定义为收入三级或非创伤中心的住院患者。我们使用逆概率调查加权的广义线性模型来确定患者和医院特征与主要结局之间的关系。
在 6572 名加权患者中,有 982 名(15%)分诊不足。分诊不足与年龄较大(13 岁与 7 岁,P 值<0.001)、大都市区位置(86%与 68%,P<0.001)和主要腹部损伤(19%与 11%,P=0.011)显著相关。多变量调整后,与 15-17 岁患者相比,6-10 岁患者(调整后的优势比 [aOR]:2.47,P=0.002)、穿透性损伤(aOR:1.70,P=0.011)、主要胸部损伤(aOR:2.10,P=0.014)和在教学医院就诊(aOR:5.66,P<0.001)与二次分诊不足显著相关。
在发生重大创伤后,大量儿童在教学性非创伤中心被二次分诊不足。1 级和 2 级创伤中心必须与低级别创伤中心合作,以确保儿童获得公平的护理。