Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA.
Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA.
Ann Emerg Med. 2020 Feb;75(2):125-135. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2019.06.018. Epub 2019 Nov 13.
To identify predictors of undertriage among older injured Medicare beneficiaries, identify any regions in which undertriage is more likely to occur, and examine additional factors associated with undertriage at a national level.
Using 2009 to 2014 Medicare claims data, we identified older adults (≥65 years) receiving a diagnosis of traumatic injury, and linked claims with trauma center designation records from the American Trauma Society. Undertriage was defined as nontrauma centers treatment with an Injury Severity Score greater than or equal to 16, consistent with the American College of Surgeons Committee on Trauma benchmark. We used multivariable logistic regression to estimate odds of undertriage by census region, adjusting for sex, race, age, Injury Severity Score, trauma center proximity, and mode of transportation.
Forty-six percent of severely injured patients (n=125,731) were treated at a nontrauma center. Compared with that for patients in the Midwest, adjusted odds of undertriage were 100% higher for patients in Southern states (odds ratio [OR] 2.00; 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.00 to 2.04) and 78% higher in Western states (OR 1.78; 95% CI 1.73 to 1.82). Compared with that for patients aged 65 to 69 years, odds of undertriage gradually increased in all age groups, reaching 57% for patients older than 80 years (OR 1.57; 95% CI 1.52 to 1.61). Distance to a trauma center was associated with increasing odds of undertriage, with 37% higher odds (OR 1.37; 95% CI 1.15 to 1.40) for older adults living more than 30 miles from a trauma center compared with patients living within 15 miles.
Nearly half of older adult trauma patients are undertriaged; it increases with age and distance to care and is most common in Southern and Western states. Improvements to field triage and trauma center access for older patients are urgently needed.
确定老年医疗保险受益人的受伤患者分诊不足的预测因素,确定分诊不足更可能发生的区域,并在全国范围内检查与分诊不足相关的其他因素。
我们使用 2009 年至 2014 年的医疗保险索赔数据,确定了≥65 岁的老年人(≥65 岁)患有创伤性损伤,并将索赔与美国创伤协会的创伤中心指定记录相关联。分诊不足定义为接受大于或等于 16 的损伤严重程度评分的非创伤中心治疗,符合美国外科医师学会创伤委员会的基准。我们使用多变量逻辑回归来估计按人口普查区域划分的分诊不足的可能性,调整性别、种族、年龄、损伤严重程度评分、创伤中心的接近程度和运输方式。
46%的严重受伤患者(n=125731)在非创伤中心接受治疗。与中西部地区的患者相比,南部各州的患者的分诊不足调整后的几率高出 100%(比值比[OR]2.00;95%置信区间[CI]2.00 至 2.04),而西部各州的患者则高出 78%(OR 1.78;95% CI 1.73 至 1.82)。与 65 至 69 岁的患者相比,所有年龄段的患者的分诊不足几率逐渐增加,年龄超过 80 岁的患者的几率达到 57%(OR 1.57;95% CI 1.52 至 1.61)。与创伤中心的距离与分诊不足的几率增加有关,与居住在创伤中心 15 英里以内的患者相比,居住在 30 英里以上的老年人的几率增加了 37%(OR 1.37;95% CI 1.15 至 1.40)。
近一半的老年创伤患者分诊不足;随着年龄的增长和距离的增加而增加,在南部和西部各州最为常见。迫切需要改善对老年患者的现场分诊和创伤中心的访问。