• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

放化疗对比单纯放疗能否改善高级别 cT1 膀胱尿路上皮癌的生存结局?

Does Chemo-Radiotherapy Improve Survival Outcomes vs. Radiotherapy Alone for High-Grade cT1 Urothelial Carcinoma of the Bladder?

机构信息

Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO.

Department of Radiation Oncology, Springfield Clinic, Springfield, IL.

出版信息

Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2023 Dec;21(6):653-659.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.clgc.2023.07.011. Epub 2023 Aug 2.

DOI:10.1016/j.clgc.2023.07.011
PMID:37704483
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (non-MIBC) that is high-grade and confined to the lamina propria (HGT1) often has an aggressive clinical course. Currently, there is limited data on the comparative effectiveness of RT vs. CRT for HGT1 non-MIBC. We hypothesized that CRT would be associated with improved overall survival (OS) vs. RT in HGT1 bladder cancer.

METHODS

Patients diagnosed with HGT1 non-MIBC, and treated with transurethral resection of bladder tumor followed by either treatment with RT alone or CRT, were identified in the National Cancer Database. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was employed and weight-adjusted multivariable analysis (MVA) using Cox regression modeling was used to compare overall survival (OS) hazard ratios. OS was the primary endpoint, and was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank tests.

RESULTS

A total of 259 patients with HGT1 UC were treated with: (i) RT alone (n = 123) or (ii) CRT (n = 136). Propensity-weighted MVA showed that combined modality treatment with CRT was associated with improved OS relative to radiation alone (Hazard Ratio [HR]: 0.62, 95% Confidence Interval (95% CI): 0.44-0.88, P = .007). Four-year OS for the CRT vs. RT alone was 36% and 19%, respectively (log-rank P <.008).

CONCLUSION

For patients with HGT1 bladder cancer, concurrent CRT was associated with improved OS compared with radiation alone in a retrospective cohort. These results are hypothesis-generating. The NRG is currently developing a phase II randomized clinical trial comparing CRT to other novel, bladder preservation strategies.

摘要

背景

局限于固有层的高级别非肌层浸润性膀胱癌(HGT1)常具有侵袭性的临床病程。目前,关于 HGT1 非肌层浸润性膀胱癌的 RT 与 CRT 比较效果的数据有限。我们假设 CRT 与 RT 相比,在 HGT1 膀胱癌中具有更好的总生存(OS)。

方法

在国家癌症数据库中,鉴定出诊断为 HGT1 非肌层浸润性膀胱癌并接受经尿道膀胱肿瘤切除术治疗,随后单独接受 RT 或 CRT 治疗的患者。采用逆概率治疗加权(IPTW),并使用 Cox 回归模型进行加权多变量分析(MVA),以比较总生存(OS)风险比。OS 是主要终点,采用 Kaplan-Meier 方法和对数秩检验进行估计。

结果

共有 259 例 HGT1UC 患者接受治疗:(i)单独接受 RT(n=123)或(ii)接受 CRT(n=136)。倾向评分加权 MVA 显示,与单独放疗相比,联合使用 CRT 的联合治疗与 OS 改善相关(风险比[HR]:0.62,95%置信区间[95%CI]:0.44-0.88,P=0.007)。CRT 与单独 RT 的 4 年 OS 分别为 36%和 19%(对数秩 P<0.008)。

结论

对于 HGT1 膀胱癌患者,在回顾性队列中,与单独放疗相比,同步 CRT 与 OS 改善相关。这些结果是假设产生的。NRG 目前正在开发一项比较 CRT 与其他新型膀胱保留策略的 II 期随机临床试验。

相似文献

1
Does Chemo-Radiotherapy Improve Survival Outcomes vs. Radiotherapy Alone for High-Grade cT1 Urothelial Carcinoma of the Bladder?放化疗对比单纯放疗能否改善高级别 cT1 膀胱尿路上皮癌的生存结局?
Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2023 Dec;21(6):653-659.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.clgc.2023.07.011. Epub 2023 Aug 2.
2
Concurrent chemotherapy is associated with improved survival in elderly patients with bladder cancer undergoing radiotherapy.同期化疗与接受放疗的老年膀胱癌患者的生存改善相关。
Cancer. 2017 Sep 15;123(18):3524-3531. doi: 10.1002/cncr.30719. Epub 2017 Jun 5.
3
Treatment Patterns and Survival Outcomes for Patients with Small Cell Carcinoma of the Bladder.膀胱癌小细胞癌患者的治疗模式和生存结果。
Eur Urol Focus. 2018 Dec;4(6):900-906. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2017.09.001. Epub 2017 Sep 14.
4
Bladder only versus bladder plus pelvic lymph node chemoradiation for muscle-invasive bladder cancer.单纯膀胱放疗与膀胱加盆腔淋巴结放疗治疗肌层浸润性膀胱癌的比较。
Urol Oncol. 2023 Jul;41(7):325.e15-325.e23. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2022.12.011. Epub 2023 Jan 30.
5
Efficacy of High-Intensity Local Treatment for Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma of the Bladder: A Propensity Score-Weighted Analysis From the National Cancer Data Base.高强度局部治疗转移性膀胱癌的疗效:来自国家癌症数据库的倾向评分加权分析。
J Clin Oncol. 2016 Oct 10;34(29):3529-3536. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2016.66.7352.
6
Radical cystectomy versus trimodality therapy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer: a multi-institutional propensity score matched and weighted analysis.根治性膀胱切除术与三联疗法治疗肌层浸润性膀胱癌:多机构倾向评分匹配和加权分析。
Lancet Oncol. 2023 Jun;24(6):669-681. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(23)00170-5. Epub 2023 May 12.
7
Comparative survival analysis of bladder preservation therapy versus radical cystectomy in muscle-invasive bladder cancer.比较肌层浸润性膀胱癌行膀胱保留治疗与根治性膀胱切除术的生存分析。
Cancer Med. 2024 Jan;13(2):e6972. doi: 10.1002/cam4.6972.
8
Propensity matched comparative analysis of survival following chemoradiation or radical cystectomy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer.比较肌层浸润性膀胱癌行放化疗与根治性膀胱切除术的生存预后的倾向评分匹配分析。
BJU Int. 2018 May;121(5):745-751. doi: 10.1111/bju.14109. Epub 2018 Jan 22.
9
Contemporary use trends and survival outcomes in patients undergoing radical cystectomy or bladder-preservation therapy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer.接受根治性膀胱切除术或膀胱保留治疗的肌层浸润性膀胱癌患者的当代使用趋势和生存结果。
Cancer. 2017 Nov 15;123(22):4337-4345. doi: 10.1002/cncr.30900. Epub 2017 Jul 25.
10
Radical radiotherapy in older patients with muscle invasive bladder cancer.根治性放疗治疗肌层浸润性膀胱癌老年患者。
J Geriatr Oncol. 2019 Mar;10(2):292-297. doi: 10.1016/j.jgo.2018.10.015. Epub 2019 Jan 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Eligibility and Endpoints for Clinical Trials in Trimodality Therapy for Bladder Cancer.膀胱癌三联疗法临床试验的入选标准和终点指标
Bladder Cancer. 2024 Oct 23;10(3):199-213. doi: 10.3233/BLC-240036. eCollection 2024.