Department of Psychology, Wilfrid Laurier University, Waterloo, ON, Canada.
Department of Psychology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2024 Jul;77(7):1555-1580. doi: 10.1177/17470218231202986. Epub 2023 Oct 17.
Researchers have proposed a coarser or gist-based representation for sounds, whereas a more verbatim-based representation is retrieved from long-term memory to account for higher recognition performance for pictures. This study examined the mechanism for the recognition advantage for pictures. In Experiment 1A, pictures and sounds were presented in separate trials in a mixed list during the study phase and participants showed in a yes-no test, a higher proportion of correct responses for targets, exemplar foils categorically related to the target, and novel foils for pictures compared with sounds. In Experiment 1B, the picture recognition advantage was replicated in a two-alternative forced-choice test for the novel and exemplar foil conditions. For Experiment 2A, even when verbal labels (i.e., written labels) were presented for sounds during the study phase, a recognition advantage for pictures was shown for both targets and exemplar foils. Experiment 2B showed that the presence of written labels for sounds, during both the study and test phases did not eliminate the advantage of recognition of pictures in terms of correct rejection of exemplar foils. Finally, in two additional experiments, we examined whether the degree of similarity within pictures and sounds could account for the recognition advantage of pictures. The mean similarity rating for pictures was higher than the mean similarity rating for sounds in the exemplar test condition, whereas mean similarity rating for sounds was higher than pictures in the novel test condition. These results pose a challenge for some versions of distinctiveness accounts of the picture superiority effect. We propose a conceptual-perceptual distinctiveness processing account of recognition memory for pictures and sounds.
研究人员提出了一种更粗糙或基于要点的声音表示,而从长期记忆中检索到的更逐字逐句的表示则用于解释图片更高的识别性能。本研究考察了图片识别优势的机制。在实验 1A 中,在学习阶段,图片和声音在混合列表的单独试验中呈现,参与者在 yes-no 测试中表现出更高的比例,对目标、与目标类别相关的范例诱饵和新颖的诱饵的正确反应,与声音相比,图片的反应更多。在实验 1B 中,在对新颖和范例诱饵条件的二选一强制选择测试中复制了图片识别优势。对于实验 2A,即使在学习阶段为声音呈现了口头标签(即书面标签),也显示出图片的识别优势,无论是目标还是范例诱饵。实验 2B 表明,在学习和测试阶段都为声音呈现书面标签,并不会消除正确拒绝范例诱饵的情况下对图片识别的优势。最后,在另外两个实验中,我们检查了图片和声音内部的相似程度是否可以解释图片的识别优势。在范例测试条件下,图片的平均相似性评分高于声音的平均相似性评分,而在新颖测试条件下,声音的平均相似性评分高于图片。这些结果对一些独特性解释的图片优势效应的版本提出了挑战。我们提出了一种基于概念感知独特性的图片和声音识别记忆处理的解释。