• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过福柯的权力/知识视角审视研究评估、学术奖励制度和学术出版。

Viewing research assessment, the academic reward system, and academic publishing through the power/knowledge lens of Foucault.

作者信息

Bowman Timothy D

机构信息

School of Information Studies, Dominican University, Chicago, IL, United States.

出版信息

Front Res Metr Anal. 2023 Aug 29;8:1179376. doi: 10.3389/frma.2023.1179376. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.3389/frma.2023.1179376
PMID:37705872
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10495840/
Abstract

The academic research assessment system, the academic reward system, and the academic publishing system are interrelated mechanisms that facilitate the scholarly production of knowledge. This article considers these systems using a Foucauldian lens to examine the power/knowledge relationships found within and through these systems. A brief description of the various systems is introduced followed by examples of instances where Foucault's power, knowledge, discourse, and power/knowledge concepts are useful to provide a broader understanding of the norms and rules associated with each system, how these systems form a network of power relationships that reinforce and shape one another.

摘要

学术研究评估体系、学术奖励体系和学术出版体系是相互关联的机制,有助于知识的学术产出。本文运用福柯主义视角审视这些体系,以考察这些体系内部及贯穿其中的权力/知识关系。文章首先简要介绍了各体系,随后列举了一些实例,说明福柯的权力、知识、话语及权力/知识概念如何有助于更全面地理解与每个体系相关的规范和规则,以及这些体系如何形成一个相互强化和塑造的权力关系网络。

相似文献

1
Viewing research assessment, the academic reward system, and academic publishing through the power/knowledge lens of Foucault.通过福柯的权力/知识视角审视研究评估、学术奖励制度和学术出版。
Front Res Metr Anal. 2023 Aug 29;8:1179376. doi: 10.3389/frma.2023.1179376. eCollection 2023.
2
Foucault's notion of problematization: a methodological discussion of the application of Foucault's later work to nursing research.福柯的问题化概念:关于福柯后期作品应用于护理研究的方法学讨论。
Nurs Inq. 2015 Sep;22(3):202-9. doi: 10.1111/nin.12094. Epub 2015 Feb 25.
3
Doing Foucault: inquiring into nursing knowledge with Foucauldian discourse analysis.践行福柯:运用福柯式话语分析探究护理知识
Nurs Philos. 2015 Apr;16(2):87-97. doi: 10.1111/nup.12079. Epub 2015 Feb 12.
4
Foucault and nursing: a history of the present.福柯与护理:当下的历史
Nurs Inq. 1999 Dec;6(4):231-40. doi: 10.1046/j.1440-1800.1999.00042.x.
5
The domestication of Foucault: Government, critique, war.福柯的驯化:治理、批判、战争。
Hist Human Sci. 2014 Dec;27(5):26-53. doi: 10.1177/0952695114538990.
6
Foucault and medicine: challenging normative claims.福柯与医学:挑战规范性主张。
Med Health Care Philos. 2023 Dec;26(4):539-548. doi: 10.1007/s11019-023-10170-y. Epub 2023 Sep 25.
7
Protecting vulnerable research participants: a Foucault-inspired analysis of ethics committees.保护脆弱的研究参与者:基于福柯思想的伦理委员会分析。
Nurs Ethics. 2011 Sep;18(5):640-50. doi: 10.1177/0969733011403807. Epub 2011 Jun 6.
8
Foucault and physiotherapy.福柯与物理治疗。
Physiother Theory Pract. 2012 Aug;28(6):447-53. doi: 10.3109/09593985.2012.676937.
9
Interrogating discourse: the application of Foucault's methodological discussion to specific inquiry.质询话语:福柯方法论讨论在具体探究中的应用。
Health (London). 2013 Sep;17(5):478-94. doi: 10.1177/1363459312464073. Epub 2012 Nov 1.
10
Foucault's legacy for nursing: are we beneficiaries or intestate heirs?福柯对护理学的遗产影响:我们是受益者还是法定继承人?
Nurs Philos. 2016 Apr;17(2):119-31. doi: 10.1111/nup.12113. Epub 2015 Dec 17.

本文引用的文献

1
A Foucauldian discourse analysis of media reporting on the nurse-as-hero during COVID-19.福柯式话语分析在 COVID-19 期间对护士英雄形象的媒体报道。
Nurs Inq. 2022 Jul;29(3):e12471. doi: 10.1111/nin.12471. Epub 2021 Nov 2.
2
Analysis of Research and Scholarship Criteria Within Promotion and Tenure Documents of US Pharmacy Schools.美国药学院晋升与终身教职文件中的研究与学术标准分析
Am J Pharm Educ. 2021 Mar;85(3):7983. doi: 10.5688/ajpe7983. Epub 2020 Dec 4.
3
Socially Constructing Healthy Eating: A Foucauldian Discourse Analysis of Healthy Eating Information and Advice.社会建构健康饮食:健康饮食信息和建议的福柯式话语分析。
Qual Health Res. 2021 Sep;31(11):2135-2146. doi: 10.1177/10497323211023436. Epub 2021 Jun 24.
4
Revising evaluation metrics for graduate admissions and faculty advancement to dismantle privilege.修订研究生招生和教师晋升的评估指标以消除特权。
Nat Neurosci. 2021 Jun;24(6):755-758. doi: 10.1038/s41593-021-00836-2.
5
Academic criteria for promotion and tenure in biomedical sciences faculties: cross sectional analysis of international sample of universities.生物医学科学教师晋升和终身教职的学术标准:对国际大学样本的横断面分析。
BMJ. 2020 Jun 25;369:m2081. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m2081.
6
Tenure and promotion after the pandemic.疫情后的终身教职与晋升
Science. 2020 Jun 5;368(6495):1075. doi: 10.1126/science.abc7469.
7
Why we publish where we do: Faculty publishing values and their relationship to review, promotion and tenure expectations.为什么我们选择在特定的地方发表:教师的发表价值观及其与评审、晋升和终身教职期望的关系。
PLoS One. 2020 Mar 11;15(3):e0228914. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0228914. eCollection 2020.
8
Use of the Journal Impact Factor in academic review, promotion, and tenure evaluations.在学术评审、晋升和终身职位评估中使用期刊影响因子。
Elife. 2019 Jul 31;8:e47338. doi: 10.7554/eLife.47338.
9
How significant are the public dimensions of faculty work in review, promotion and tenure documents?在评审、晋升和终身教职文件中,教师工作的公共维度有多重要?
Elife. 2019 Feb 12;8:e42254. doi: 10.7554/eLife.42254.
10
The evaluation of scholarship in academic promotion and tenure processes: Past, present, and future.学术晋升和终身教职评定过程中学术成果的评估:过去、现在与未来。
F1000Res. 2018 Oct 5;7:1605. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.16493.1. eCollection 2018.