Suppr超能文献

下肢假肢患者生活质量的改善:2 种类型的下肢接受腔及其对功能和用户舒适度的影响的比较-病例报告。

Improvement in quality of life of transfemoral amputees: Comparison between 2 types of transfemoral sockets and their influence on functionality and user comfort - A case report.

机构信息

Orthotic and Prosthetic Unit, Centro de Medicina de Reabilitação de Alcoitão, Alcabideche, Portugal.

Flixt, Oviedo, Spain.

出版信息

Prosthet Orthot Int. 2024 Jun 1;48(3):344-347. doi: 10.1097/PXR.0000000000000286. Epub 2023 Sep 14.

Abstract

Among the components of lower limb prostheses, a perfectly adapted prosthetic socket is crucial to a successful rehabilitation process. Thus, developing a more comfortable socket could improve the quality of life for transfemoral (TF) amputees. The objective of this case report was to compare 2 TF sockets by evaluating the relationship between socket stiffness and user comfort and their influence on functionality to improve the quality of life of TF amputees. The participant received 2 different sockets: (A) flexible Flixt® socket; (B) conventional socket. He used each socket for 90 days, and after that was submitted to an evaluation at the Gait Laboratory (kinematic and dynamic analyses), completed the Prosthesis Evaluation Questionnaire, and performed Timed Up and Go test, 6-Minute March Test (6MWT), 10-Meter Walk Test, and Amputee Mobility Predictor test. After results were analyzed, the socket that obtained the best degree of satisfaction was assigned to the amputee participant. Combined measures showed that socket B does not considerably change the kinematic parameters neither dynamics parameters namely at stance phase. At Prosthesis Evaluation Questionnaire results, socket A had a better rating than socket B. The results of the Timed Up and Go test, 6MWT, 10-Meter Walk Test, and Amputee Mobility Predictor test obtained identical values, except for the 6MWT. This case report shows evidence of participant satisfaction improvement when using the flexible socket. The study also demonstrates that both sockets are quite effective.

摘要

在下肢假肢的组成部分中,一个完全适配的假肢接受腔对于成功的康复过程至关重要。因此,开发更舒适的接受腔可以提高股骨截肢者的生活质量。本病例报告的目的是通过评估接受腔硬度和用户舒适度之间的关系及其对功能的影响,来比较两种股骨接受腔,从而改善股骨截肢者的生活质量。该参与者接受了两种不同的接受腔:(A)灵活的 Flixt®接受腔;(B)常规接受腔。他分别使用每种接受腔 90 天,然后在步态实验室进行评估(运动学和动力学分析),完成假肢评估问卷,并进行起立-行走测试、6 分钟步行测试(6MWT)、10 米步行测试和截肢者移动能力预测测试。分析结果后,为参与者分配满意度最高的接受腔。综合措施表明,接受腔 B 并没有显著改变运动学参数,也没有显著改变动力学参数,特别是在站立阶段。在假肢评估问卷的结果中,接受腔 A 的评分优于接受腔 B。在起立-行走测试、6MWT、10 米步行测试和截肢者移动能力预测测试的结果中,除了 6MWT 外,两种接受腔都得到了相同的结果。本病例报告显示,使用灵活接受腔可提高参与者的满意度。该研究还表明,两种接受腔都非常有效。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验