• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

下肢假肢患者生活质量的改善:2 种类型的下肢接受腔及其对功能和用户舒适度的影响的比较-病例报告。

Improvement in quality of life of transfemoral amputees: Comparison between 2 types of transfemoral sockets and their influence on functionality and user comfort - A case report.

机构信息

Orthotic and Prosthetic Unit, Centro de Medicina de Reabilitação de Alcoitão, Alcabideche, Portugal.

Flixt, Oviedo, Spain.

出版信息

Prosthet Orthot Int. 2024 Jun 1;48(3):344-347. doi: 10.1097/PXR.0000000000000286. Epub 2023 Sep 14.

DOI:10.1097/PXR.0000000000000286
PMID:37708337
Abstract

Among the components of lower limb prostheses, a perfectly adapted prosthetic socket is crucial to a successful rehabilitation process. Thus, developing a more comfortable socket could improve the quality of life for transfemoral (TF) amputees. The objective of this case report was to compare 2 TF sockets by evaluating the relationship between socket stiffness and user comfort and their influence on functionality to improve the quality of life of TF amputees. The participant received 2 different sockets: (A) flexible Flixt® socket; (B) conventional socket. He used each socket for 90 days, and after that was submitted to an evaluation at the Gait Laboratory (kinematic and dynamic analyses), completed the Prosthesis Evaluation Questionnaire, and performed Timed Up and Go test, 6-Minute March Test (6MWT), 10-Meter Walk Test, and Amputee Mobility Predictor test. After results were analyzed, the socket that obtained the best degree of satisfaction was assigned to the amputee participant. Combined measures showed that socket B does not considerably change the kinematic parameters neither dynamics parameters namely at stance phase. At Prosthesis Evaluation Questionnaire results, socket A had a better rating than socket B. The results of the Timed Up and Go test, 6MWT, 10-Meter Walk Test, and Amputee Mobility Predictor test obtained identical values, except for the 6MWT. This case report shows evidence of participant satisfaction improvement when using the flexible socket. The study also demonstrates that both sockets are quite effective.

摘要

在下肢假肢的组成部分中,一个完全适配的假肢接受腔对于成功的康复过程至关重要。因此,开发更舒适的接受腔可以提高股骨截肢者的生活质量。本病例报告的目的是通过评估接受腔硬度和用户舒适度之间的关系及其对功能的影响,来比较两种股骨接受腔,从而改善股骨截肢者的生活质量。该参与者接受了两种不同的接受腔:(A)灵活的 Flixt®接受腔;(B)常规接受腔。他分别使用每种接受腔 90 天,然后在步态实验室进行评估(运动学和动力学分析),完成假肢评估问卷,并进行起立-行走测试、6 分钟步行测试(6MWT)、10 米步行测试和截肢者移动能力预测测试。分析结果后,为参与者分配满意度最高的接受腔。综合措施表明,接受腔 B 并没有显著改变运动学参数,也没有显著改变动力学参数,特别是在站立阶段。在假肢评估问卷的结果中,接受腔 A 的评分优于接受腔 B。在起立-行走测试、6MWT、10 米步行测试和截肢者移动能力预测测试的结果中,除了 6MWT 外,两种接受腔都得到了相同的结果。本病例报告显示,使用灵活接受腔可提高参与者的满意度。该研究还表明,两种接受腔都非常有效。

相似文献

1
Improvement in quality of life of transfemoral amputees: Comparison between 2 types of transfemoral sockets and their influence on functionality and user comfort - A case report.下肢假肢患者生活质量的改善:2 种类型的下肢接受腔及其对功能和用户舒适度的影响的比较-病例报告。
Prosthet Orthot Int. 2024 Jun 1;48(3):344-347. doi: 10.1097/PXR.0000000000000286. Epub 2023 Sep 14.
2
How To Improve Patient Selection in Individuals With Lower Extremity Amputation Using a Bone-anchored Prosthesis.如何使用骨锚式假肢改善下肢截肢患者的患者选择
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Jan 24. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003369.
3
Comparison of Quality of Life in Transfemoral Amputee Using Bone-Anchored Prostheses vs. Socket Prostheses: A Systemic Review and Meta-Analysis.使用骨锚式假肢与传统接受腔假肢的经股截肢者生活质量比较:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Orthop Surg. 2025 Aug;17(8):2234-2254. doi: 10.1111/os.70086. Epub 2025 Jul 18.
4
What Functional Outcomes Can Be Expected With Osseointegrated Prostheses in Transfemoral Amputations?经股骨截肢患者使用骨整合假肢可预期获得哪些功能结果?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Mar 1;483(3):513-523. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003267. Epub 2025 Jan 31.
5
Is Socket Flexion Alignment Associated With Changes in Gait Parameters in Individuals With an Above-knee Amputation and a Hip Flexion Contracture?对于膝上截肢且伴有髋关节屈曲挛缩的个体,残肢屈曲对线与步态参数变化是否相关?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Mar 1;483(3):535-546. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003288. Epub 2024 Nov 5.
6
Greater external negative mechanical work is accompanied by a greater metabolic cost of walking for socket-suspended versus bone-anchored prosthesis users with transfemoral limb loss.对于经股骨截肢且使用接受腔悬吊式与骨锚定式假肢的使用者而言,更大的外部负向机械功伴随着更高的行走代谢成本。
Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2025 Jul;127:106598. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2025.106598. Epub 2025 Jun 23.
7
Does Transhumeral Osseointegration After Amputation Improve Patient-reported Outcomes and Prosthesis Use?截肢后经肱骨骨整合是否能改善患者报告的结局及假肢使用情况?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Feb 19. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003420.
8
Associations Between Skeletal Alignment and Biomechanical Symmetry Before and After Transfemoral Bone-anchored Limb Implantation.经股骨骨锚式肢体植入前后骨骼排列与生物力学对称性之间的关联
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 May 1;483(5):902-914. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003344. Epub 2024 Dec 24.
9
Biomechanical characteristics of transfemoral bone-anchored prostheses during gait: A review of literature.股骨髓内钉假体在步态中的生物力学特性:文献回顾。
Prosthet Orthot Int. 2024 Aug 1;48(4):412-421. doi: 10.1097/PXR.0000000000000263. Epub 2023 Aug 25.
10
Evaluating the Effectiveness of Transtibial Prosthetic Socket Shape Design Using Artificial Intelligence: A Clinical Comparison With Traditional Plaster Cast Socket Designs.使用人工智能评估经胫骨假肢接受腔形状设计的有效性:与传统石膏绷带接受腔设计的临床比较
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2025 Feb;106(2):239-246. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2024.08.026. Epub 2024 Sep 19.

引用本文的文献

1
The role of human thermoregulation in thermal discomfort in lower-limb prosthetics: A scoping review.人体体温调节在下肢假肢热不适中的作用:一项范围综述。
Can Prosthet Orthot J. 2025 Mar 28;8(1):43073. doi: 10.33137/cpoj.v8i1.43073. eCollection 2025.