School of Medicine; Keele Cardiovascular Research Group, Centre for Prognosis Research, Keele University, Keele, United Kingdom.
Keele Cardiovascular Research Group, Centre for Prognosis Research, Keele University, Keele, United Kingdom; Department of Cardiology, University Hospital of Split, Split, Croatia.
Am J Cardiol. 2023 Nov 1;206:210-218. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2023.08.138. Epub 2023 Sep 13.
Data are limited on whether the causes of emergency department (ED) encounters for cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) and associated clinical outcomes vary by frailty status. Using the United States Nationwide ED Sample, selected CVD encounters (acute myocardial infarction [AMI], ischemic stroke, atrial fibrillation [AF], heart failure [HF], pulmonary embolism, cardiac arrest, and hemorrhagic stroke) were stratified by hospital frailty risk score (HFRS). Logistic regression was used to determine the adjusted odds ratios (aORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of ED mortality among the different frailty groups. A total of 8,577,028 selected CVD ED encounters were included. A total of 5,120,843 (59.7%) had a low HFRS (<5), 3,041,699 (35.5%) had an intermediate HFRS (5 to 15), and 414,485 (4.8%) had a high HFRS (>15). Ischemic stroke was the most common reason for the encounter in the high HFRS group (66.9%), followed by hemorrhagic stroke (11.7%) and AMI (7.2%). For the low HFRS group, AF was the most common reason for the encounter (30.2%), followed by AMI (23.6%) and HF (16.8%). Compared with the low-risk group, high-risk patients had a decreased ED mortality and an increased overall mortality across most CVD encounters (p <0.001). The strongest association with overall mortality was observed among patients with a high HFRS admitted for AF (aOR 27.14, 95% CI 25.03 to 29.43) and HF (aOR 13.71, 95% CI 12.95 to 14.51) compared with their low-risk counterparts. In conclusion, patients presenting to the ED with acute CVD have a significant frailty burden, with different patterns of CVD according to frailty status. Frailty is associated with an increased all-cause mortality in patients for most CVD encounters.
关于因心血管疾病(CVD)而到急诊科(ED)就诊的原因以及相关临床结局是否因虚弱状态而异,相关数据有限。利用美国全国 ED 抽样数据,按医院虚弱风险评分(HFRS)对选定的 CVD 就诊(急性心肌梗死[AMI]、缺血性卒、心房颤动[AF]、心力衰竭[HF]、肺栓塞、心脏骤停和出血性卒)进行分层。采用 logistic 回归确定不同虚弱组 ED 死亡率的调整比值比(aOR)和 95%置信区间(CI)。共纳入 8577028 例选定的 CVD ED 就诊。低 HFRS(<5)者共 5120843 例(59.7%),中 HFRS(5-15)者共 3041699 例(35.5%),高 HFRS(>15)者共 414485 例(4.8%)。在 HFRS 较高组中,最常见的就诊原因是缺血性卒(66.9%),其次是出血性卒(11.7%)和 AMI(7.2%)。在 HFRS 较低组中,AF 是最常见的就诊原因(30.2%),其次是 AMI(23.6%)和 HF(16.8%)。与低危组相比,高危患者在大多数 CVD 就诊中 ED 死亡率降低,总死亡率增加(p<0.001)。HFRS 较高的患者因 AF(aOR 27.14,95%CI 25.03-29.43)和 HF(aOR 13.71,95%CI 12.95-14.51)住院的患者与低危患者相比,与总死亡率的相关性最强。总之,因急性 CVD 到 ED 就诊的患者有显著的虚弱负担,且根据虚弱状态存在不同的 CVD 模式。虚弱与大多数 CVD 就诊患者的全因死亡率增加相关。