Leu Chiara, Courtin Arthur, Cussac Céline, Liberati Giulia
Institute of Neuroscience, Université catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium.
Institute of Neuroscience, Université catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium; Center of Functionally Integrative Neuroscience, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Cortex. 2023 Nov;168:114-129. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2023.08.005. Epub 2023 Aug 24.
Sustained nociceptive stimuli have been shown to modulate the amplitude of ongoing neural oscillations in the theta, alpha and beta frequency bands at the frequency of stimulation, suggesting a relationship between these ongoing oscillations and pain perception. Yet, whether these ongoing oscillations are actually related to the pain experience remains unclear. If it were the case, then cognitive processes that are known to affect pain intensity should also affect these ongoing oscillations. To this end, we used electroencephalography (EEG) to investigate whether distraction - an attentional state known to affect pain perception - also modulates the amplitude of these neural oscillations. More specifically, we hypothesized that performing an unrelated arithmetic task during sustained nociceptive stimulation would lead to a decrease in the modulations of ongoing oscillations exerted by the stimulation. To assess the selectivity of this modulation for nociception, we compared the modulations of ongoing oscillations exerted by sustained periodic thermonociceptive and non-nociceptive vibrotactile stimulation (.2 Hz, 75 sec), while participants were either asked to solve an unrelated arithmetic task (distraction task) or received no specific instruction (baseline). The intensity of perception was significantly reduced by the arithmetic task in both the thermonociceptive and the vibrotactile modality, and the sustained periodic stimulation elicited a periodic response at the frequency of stimulation in both modalities. However, the distraction task did not show a differential effect for the two stimulation modalities in any of the frequency bands. The fact that, unlike pain perception, these oscillations did not appear to be affected by the task suggests that they are dissociable from pain perception. Whether a different task (leading to a stronger degree of distraction) could lead to different results is unclear.
持续的伤害性刺激已被证明能在刺激频率下调节θ、α和β频段中正在进行的神经振荡的幅度,这表明这些正在进行的振荡与疼痛感知之间存在关联。然而,这些正在进行的振荡是否真的与疼痛体验相关仍不清楚。如果是这样,那么已知会影响疼痛强度的认知过程也应该会影响这些正在进行的振荡。为此,我们使用脑电图(EEG)来研究分心——一种已知会影响疼痛感知的注意力状态——是否也会调节这些神经振荡的幅度。更具体地说,我们假设在持续的伤害性刺激期间执行一项不相关的算术任务会导致刺激对正在进行的振荡的调节作用减弱。为了评估这种调节对伤害感受的选择性,我们比较了持续周期性热痛觉刺激和非痛觉性振动触觉刺激(0.2赫兹,75秒)对正在进行的振荡的调节作用,同时要求参与者要么解决一项不相关的算术任务(分心任务),要么不接受特定指令(基线)。在热痛觉和振动触觉两种模式下,算术任务都显著降低了感知强度,并且持续的周期性刺激在两种模式下都在刺激频率上引发了周期性反应。然而,分心任务在任何频段上对两种刺激模式都没有显示出差异效应。与疼痛感知不同,这些振荡似乎不受任务影响,这一事实表明它们与疼痛感知是可分离的。尚不清楚不同的任务(导致更强程度的分心)是否会产生不同的结果。