• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

多利益相关方合作提高院外心脏骤停患者存活率。

A cross-stakeholder approach to improving out-of-hospital cardiac arrest survival.

机构信息

Acute Care Research Unit, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Mixed Methods Program and Department of Family Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI; Institute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.

Acute Care Research Unit, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Institute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Qualitative and Mixed Methods Core, Center for Clinical Management Research, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, Ann Arbor, MI.

出版信息

Am Heart J. 2023 Dec;266:106-119. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2023.09.004. Epub 2023 Sep 12.

DOI:10.1016/j.ahj.2023.09.004
PMID:37709108
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) affects over 300,000 individuals per year in the United States with poor survival rates overall. A remarkable 5-fold difference in survival-to-hospital discharge rates exist across United States communities.

METHODS

We conducted a study using qualitative research methods comparing the system of care across sites in Michigan communities with varying OHCA survival outcomes, as measured by return to spontaneous circulation with pulse upon emergency department arrival.

RESULTS

Major themes distinguishing higher performing sites were (1) working as a team, (2) devoting resources to coordination across agencies, and (3) developing a continuous quality improvement culture. These themes spanned the chain of survival framework for OHCA. By examining the unique processes, procedures, and characteristics of higher- relative to lower-performing sites, we gleaned lessons learned that appear to distinguish higher performers. The higher performing sites reported being the most collaborative, due in part to facilitation of system integration by progressive leadership that is willing to build bridges among stakeholders.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on the distinguishing features of higher performing sites, we provide recommendations for toolkit development to improve survival in prehospital systems of care for OHCA.

摘要

背景

美国每年有超过 30 万人发生院外心脏骤停 (OHCA),总体存活率较低。美国各社区的存活率到出院率差异显著,高达 5 倍。

方法

我们使用定性研究方法进行了一项研究,比较了密歇根州不同 OHCA 存活率社区之间的护理系统,存活率通过急诊室到达时恢复自主循环和脉搏来衡量。

结果

表现较好的站点的主要特点是:(1) 团队合作,(2) 致力于协调各机构之间的资源,(3) 培养持续质量改进文化。这些主题跨越了 OHCA 的生存链框架。通过检查表现较好和较差站点的独特流程、程序和特点,我们汲取了一些经验教训,这些经验教训似乎可以区分表现较好的站点。表现较好的站点报告说他们的协作性最强,部分原因是渐进式领导促进了系统整合,愿意在利益相关者之间架起桥梁。

结论

根据表现较好站点的区别特征,我们提供了工具包开发建议,以改善 OHCA 院前护理系统的生存。

相似文献

1
A cross-stakeholder approach to improving out-of-hospital cardiac arrest survival.多利益相关方合作提高院外心脏骤停患者存活率。
Am Heart J. 2023 Dec;266:106-119. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2023.09.004. Epub 2023 Sep 12.
2
Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest surveillance --- Cardiac Arrest Registry to Enhance Survival (CARES), United States, October 1, 2005--December 31, 2010.院外心脏骤停监测 - 心脏骤停注册以提高存活率 (CARES),美国,2005 年 10 月 1 日至 2010 年 12 月 31 日。
MMWR Surveill Summ. 2011 Jul 29;60(8):1-19.
3
Variation in Survival After Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Between Emergency Medical Services Agencies.院外心脏骤停后生存率在急救医疗服务机构间的差异。
JAMA Cardiol. 2018 Oct 1;3(10):989-999. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2018.3037.
4
Prehospital critical care for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: An observational study examining survival and a stakeholder-focused cost analysis.院外心脏骤停的院前重症护理:一项观察性研究,考察生存率及以利益相关者为重点的成本分析。
BMC Emerg Med. 2016 Dec 7;16(1):47. doi: 10.1186/s12873-016-0109-y.
5
Enhancing Prehospital Outcomes for Cardiac Arrest (EPOC) study: sequential mixed-methods study protocol in Michigan, USA.增强心脏骤停(EPOC)研究的院前预后:美国密歇根州的一项序贯混合方法研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2020 Nov 27;10(11):e041277. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-041277.
6
Continuous chest compression versus interrupted chest compression for cardiopulmonary resuscitation of non-asphyxial out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.持续胸外按压与间断胸外按压用于非窒息性院外心脏骤停心肺复苏的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Mar 27;3(3):CD010134. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010134.pub2.
7
Community first responders for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in adults and children.成人及儿童院外心脏骤停的社区第一响应者。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Jul 19;7(7):CD012764. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012764.pub2.
8
Variation in pre-hospital outcomes after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in Michigan.密歇根州院外心脏骤停后院前结局的差异。
Resuscitation. 2021 Jan;158:201-207. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2020.11.034. Epub 2020 Dec 8.
9
Outcomes for Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest in the United States During the Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemic.美国在 2019 冠状病毒病大流行期间院外心脏骤停的结局。
JAMA Cardiol. 2021 Mar 1;6(3):296-303. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2020.6210.
10
Prehospital Advanced Cardiac Life Support for Out-of-hospital Cardiac Arrest: A Cohort Study.院外心脏骤停的院前高级心脏生命支持:一项队列研究。
Acad Emerg Med. 2017 Sep;24(9):1100-1109. doi: 10.1111/acem.13246. Epub 2017 Aug 16.

本文引用的文献

1
Strategies for Enhancing Prehospital Outcomes for Cardiac Arrest (EPOC).改善心脏骤停院外结局的策略(EPOC)
Rand Health Q. 2023 May 15;10(2):2. eCollection 2023 May.
2
The updated Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research based on user feedback.基于用户反馈的更新的实施研究综合框架。
Implement Sci. 2022 Oct 29;17(1):75. doi: 10.1186/s13012-022-01245-0.
3
Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics-2021 Update: A Report From the American Heart Association.心脏病与中风统计-2021 更新:美国心脏协会报告。
Circulation. 2021 Feb 23;143(8):e254-e743. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000950. Epub 2021 Jan 27.
4
Variation in pre-hospital outcomes after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in Michigan.密歇根州院外心脏骤停后院前结局的差异。
Resuscitation. 2021 Jan;158:201-207. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2020.11.034. Epub 2020 Dec 8.
5
Enhancing Prehospital Outcomes for Cardiac Arrest (EPOC) study: sequential mixed-methods study protocol in Michigan, USA.增强心脏骤停(EPOC)研究的院前预后:美国密歇根州的一项序贯混合方法研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2020 Nov 27;10(11):e041277. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-041277.
6
Changing hospital organisational culture for improved patient outcomes: developing and implementing the leadership saves lives intervention.改变医院组织文化以改善患者预后:领导拯救生命干预措施的制定与实施。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2021 Jun;30(6):475-483. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2019-010734. Epub 2020 Jul 16.
7
Optimizing Routine and Disaster Prehospital Care Through Improved Emergency Medical Services Oversight.通过改进紧急医疗服务监督优化常规和灾难院前护理。
Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2021 Oct;15(5):595-607. doi: 10.1017/dmp.2020.71. Epub 2020 Jun 1.
8
Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics-2020 Update: A Report From the American Heart Association.《心脏病与卒中统计-2020 更新:来自美国心脏协会的报告》。
Circulation. 2020 Mar 3;141(9):e139-e596. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000757. Epub 2020 Jan 29.
9
Variation in Survival After Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Between Emergency Medical Services Agencies.院外心脏骤停后生存率在急救医疗服务机构间的差异。
JAMA Cardiol. 2018 Oct 1;3(10):989-999. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2018.3037.
10
Survival and variability over time from out of hospital cardiac arrest across large geographically diverse communities participating in the Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium.在参与复苏结果联盟的地理分布广泛的大型社区中,院外心脏骤停后的生存情况和随时间变化的情况。
Resuscitation. 2018 Oct;131:74-82. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2018.07.023. Epub 2018 Jul 24.