Suppr超能文献

颅骶疗法治疗头痛障碍患者的临床疗效:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Clinical Effectiveness of Craniosacral Therapy in Patients with Headache Disorders: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

机构信息

Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universitat International de Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain.

Flores University, Department of Kinesiology and Physiotherapy, Comahue, Argentina.

出版信息

Pain Manag Nurs. 2024 Feb;25(1):e21-e28. doi: 10.1016/j.pmn.2023.07.009. Epub 2023 Sep 13.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To analyze the effectiveness of craniosacral therapy in improving pain and disability among patients with headache disorders.

DESIGN

Systematic review and meta-analysis.

DATA SOURCES

PubMed, Physiotherapy Evidence Database, Scopus, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Osteopathic Medicine Digital Library databases were searched in March 2023.

REVIEW METHODS

Two independent reviewers searched the databases and extracted data from randomized controlled trials comparing craniosacral therapy with control or sham interventions. The same reviewers assessed the methodological quality and the risk of bias using the PEDro scale and the Cochrane Collaboration tool, respectively. Grading of recommendations, assessment, development, and evaluations was used to rate the certainty of the evidence. Meta-analyses were conducted using random effects models using RevMan 5.4 software.

RESULTS

The searches retrieved 735 studies, and four studies were finally included. The craniosacral therapy provided statistically significant but clinically unimportant change on pain intensity (Mean difference = -1.10; 95% CI: -1.85, -0.35; I: 44%), and no change on disability or headache effect (Standardized Mean Difference = -0.34; 95% CI -0.70, 0.01; I: 26%). The certainty of the evidence was downgraded to very low.

CONCLUSION

Very low certainty of evidence suggests that craniosacral therapy produces clinically unimportant effects on pain intensity, whereas no significant effects were observed in disability or headache effect.

摘要

目的

分析颅骶疗法在改善头痛障碍患者疼痛和残疾方面的效果。

设计

系统评价和荟萃分析。

资料来源

2023 年 3 月,在 PubMed、Physiotherapy Evidence Database、Scopus、Cochrane Library、Web of Science 和 Osteopathic Medicine Digital Library 数据库中进行检索。

研究方法

两名独立的审查员检索数据库,并从比较颅骶疗法与对照或假干预的随机对照试验中提取数据。相同的审查员分别使用 PEDro 量表和 Cochrane 协作工具评估方法学质量和偏倚风险。使用推荐、评估、发展和评估分级(Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations)对证据的确定性进行评级。使用 RevMan 5.4 软件,采用随机效应模型进行荟萃分析。

结果

检索到 735 项研究,最终纳入 4 项研究。颅骶疗法在疼痛强度上提供了统计学上显著但临床上不重要的变化(平均差异=-1.10;95%CI:-1.85,-0.35;I²=44%),在残疾或头痛效果上没有变化(标准化均数差=-0.34;95%CI:-0.70,0.01;I²=26%)。证据的确定性被降级为极低。

结论

极低的证据确定性表明,颅骶疗法对疼痛强度产生临床上不重要的影响,而在残疾或头痛效果方面没有观察到显著效果。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验