San Diego Department of Medicine, Department of Family Medicine, University of California, 8899 University Center Lane, St 4000, La Jolla, CA, 92037, USA.
BMC Prim Care. 2023 Sep 14;24(1):186. doi: 10.1186/s12875-023-02154-x.
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has developed an evidenced based clinical screening tool, Stopping Elderly Accidents, Deaths & Injuries (STEADI) but penetration into routine clinical practice has been slow. To increase screening for falls and fall risk in an internal medicine primary care practice, a patient-centered screening program was integrated into a busy academic clinic.
Over a three month period, Patients were invited to self-screen via a large poster in the waiting room, and complete a STEADI Staying Independent questionnaire, and discuss findings with their healthcare provider. Fall Prevention Booklets were made readily available in clinic exam rooms. Questionnaires and fall prevention booklets, were uniquely numbered, and Epic Slicer-Dicer reports were utilized to evaluate falls screening-related ICD-10 codes determined a priori. Generalized linear modeling calculated difference-in-difference compared with other clinics without this program for rates of coding for fall-related diagnosis codes.
In three months, 255 questionnaires were taken; only 5 (2%) were returned for later review. 110 booklets were disseminated from clinic exam rooms. The absolute difference-in-difference in ICD-10 coding was 0.7% compared to other clinics in the same practice, and year before. Generalized linear modeling showed a 4.7% increased impact in screening-related ICD-10 codes, which was statistically significant (P = < .0001) without reported disruption to clinical workflows.
There are indicators that patient-centered selective screening at a busy academic practice may have resulted in an increase in falls-related ICD-10 coding. Clinical integration of this program was well received.
疾病控制与预防中心(CDC)开发了一种基于证据的临床筛选工具,即防止老年人意外伤害、死亡和伤害(STEADI),但该工具在常规临床实践中的应用进展缓慢。为了在一家内科初级保健诊所增加对跌倒和跌倒风险的筛查,我们将以患者为中心的筛选计划整合到一个繁忙的学术诊所中。
在三个月的时间里,我们邀请患者通过候诊室的一张大海报进行自我筛查,并填写一份 STEADI 保持独立问卷,并与他们的医疗保健提供者讨论筛查结果。在诊所检查室还备有防跌倒手册。问卷和防跌倒手册都进行了独特编号,并利用 Epic Slicer-Dicer 报告来评估预先确定的与跌倒筛查相关的 ICD-10 代码。使用广义线性模型计算了与没有该项目的其他诊所相比,与跌倒相关的诊断代码编码率的差异。
在三个月内,我们共进行了 255 次问卷调查,仅有 5 份(2%)被退回以供进一步审查。从诊所检查室共分发了 110 份手册。与同一实践中的其他诊所以及前一年相比,ICD-10 编码的绝对差异为 0.7%。广义线性模型显示,与跌倒相关的 ICD-10 编码增加了 4.7%,具有统计学意义(P < 0.0001),但未报告对临床工作流程造成干扰。
有迹象表明,在繁忙的学术实践中以患者为中心的选择性筛查可能导致与跌倒相关的 ICD-10 编码增加。该计划的临床整合受到了欢迎。