Lundin-Olsson L, Nyberg L, Gustafson Y
Department of Geriatric Medicine, Umeå University, Sweden.
J Am Geriatr Soc. 1998 Jun;46(6):758-61. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1998.tb03813.x.
To investigate the effect of a second task on balance and gait maneuvers used in everyday life. Our hypothesis was that those who were more distracted by a familiar manual task performed concurrently with functional maneuvers were more frail and more prone to falls.
A cross-sectional design with prospective follow-up for falls.
Sheltered accommodation in Umeå, Sweden.
Forty-two residents (30 women, 12 men; mean age +/- SD = 79.7 +/- 6.1 years), ambulant with or without a walking aid, able to follow simple instructions and able to carry a tumbler.
Timed Up & Go (TUG), i.e., the time taken to rise from an armchair, walk 3 meters, turn round, and sit down again. TUG was repeated with an added manual task (TUGmanual), which was to carry a glass of water while walking. The Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale, Barthel Index, Functional Reach, Mini-Mental State Examination, and Line Bisection test were used to assess for frailty. The subjects were followed-up prospectively regarding falls indoors for a period of 6-months.
Subjects with a time difference (diffTUG) between TUGmanual and TUG of > or = 4.5 seconds were considered to be distracted by the second task. Ten subjects had a difference in time of > or = 4.5 seconds. These subjects were more frail, and seven of them fell indoors during the follow-up period (odds ratio 4.7, 95%Confidence Interval (CI) 1.5-14.2).
The time difference between the TUGmanual and the TUG appears to be a valid marker of frailty and a useful tool for identifying older persons prone to falling.
研究第二项任务对日常生活中平衡和步态动作的影响。我们的假设是,在进行功能性动作的同时,那些更容易被一项熟悉的手动任务分散注意力的人身体更虚弱,更容易摔倒。
一项对跌倒进行前瞻性随访的横断面设计。
瑞典于默奥的庇护性住所。
42名居民(30名女性,12名男性;平均年龄±标准差=79.7±6.1岁),无论是否使用助行器均可行走,能够听从简单指令并能手持平底玻璃杯。
定时起立行走测试(TUG),即从扶手椅上起身、行走3米、转身并再次坐下所需的时间。在进行TUG时增加一项手动任务(TUGmanual),即在行走时手持一杯水,重复进行TUG测试。使用蒙哥马利-阿斯伯格抑郁评定量表、巴氏指数、功能性前伸测试、简易精神状态检查表和直线二等分测试来评估身体虚弱程度。对受试者进行为期6个月的室内跌倒前瞻性随访。
TUGmanual与TUG之间的时间差(diffTUG)≥4.5秒的受试者被认为受到第二项任务的干扰。10名受试者的时间差≥4.5秒。这些受试者身体更虚弱,其中7人在随访期间在室内跌倒(比值比4.7,95%置信区间(CI)1.5 - 14.2)。
TUGmanual与TUG之间的时间差似乎是身体虚弱的有效指标,也是识别易跌倒老年人的有用工具。