• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

我的身体,我的财产。

My body, my property.

作者信息

Andrews L B

出版信息

Hastings Cent Rep. 1986 Oct;16(5):28-38.

PMID:3771198
Abstract

Two recent cases raise the question: Should the body be considered a form of property? Patients generally do not share in the profits derived from the applications of research on their body parts and products. Nor is their consent for research required so long as the body part is unidentified and is removed in the course of treatment. A market in body parts and products would require consent to all categories of research and ensure that patients are protected from coercion and given the chance to be paid fairly for their contributions. Such a market might force us to rethink our policies prohibiting organ sales. Donors, recipients, and society will benefit from a market in body parts so long as owners--and no one else--retain control over their bodies.

摘要

最近的两个案例引发了这样一个问题

身体应被视为一种财产形式吗?患者通常无法分享从对其身体部位及产物进行研究应用中所获得的利润。而且,只要身体部位未被识别且是在治疗过程中被切除的,就无需征得他们对研究的同意。身体部位及产物的市场将需要征得对所有研究类别的同意,并确保患者免受胁迫,并有机会因其贡献而获得公平报酬。这样一个市场可能会迫使我们重新思考我们禁止器官买卖的政策。只要所有者——而非其他任何人——对其身体保持控制权,捐赠者、接受者和社会都将从身体部位市场中受益。

相似文献

1
My body, my property.我的身体,我的财产。
Hastings Cent Rep. 1986 Oct;16(5):28-38.
2
Legal & ethical safeguards: protection of society's most vulnerable participants in a commercialized organ transplantation system.法律与伦理保障:在商业化器官移植系统中保护社会最弱势群体参与者。
Am J Law Med. 1995;21(1):45-110.
3
Cells, sales, and royalties: the patient's right to a portion of the profits.
Yale Law Policy Rev. 1988;6(1):179-202.
4
Recognizing property interests in bodily tissues. A need for legislative guidance.
J Leg Med. 1989 Jun;10(2):357-75. doi: 10.1080/01947648909513576.
5
Profiting from patient tissue: can patients lay claim to profits from products derived from their tissues?
Med World News. 1985 Jun 10;26(11):63.
6
Research that could yield marketable products from human materials: the problem of informed consent.旨在从人体材料中开发适销产品的研究:知情同意问题。
IRB. 1986 Jan-Feb;8(1):6-7.
7
Moore v. Regents of the University of California: expanded disclosure, limited property rights.摩尔诉加利福尼亚大学董事会案:扩大披露范围,限制财产权。
Northwest Univ Law Rev. 1992 Winter;86(2):453-96.
8
Toward the right of commerciality: recognizing property rights in the commercial value of human tissue.
UCLA Law Rev. 1986 Oct;34(1):207-64.
9
Property, progeny, and patents.财产、后代和专利。
Hastings Cent Rep. 1999 Mar-Apr;29(2):38-40.
10
Who owns the body? On the ethics of using human tissues for commercial purposes.身体归谁所有?论将人体组织用于商业目的的伦理问题。
IRB. 1986 Jan-Feb;8(1):1-5.

引用本文的文献

1
Does the ethical appropriateness of paying donors depend on what body parts they donate?向捐赠者支付报酬在伦理上是否恰当取决于他们所捐赠的身体部位吗?
Med Health Care Philos. 2016 Sep;19(3):463-73. doi: 10.1007/s11019-016-9705-6.
2
A Troubled Past? Reassessing Ethics in the History of Tissue Culture.一段 troubled 的过去?重新审视组织培养历史中的伦理问题。
Health Care Anal. 2016 Sep;24(3):246-59. doi: 10.1007/s10728-015-0304-0.
3
Living organ donation: an ethical evolution or evolution of ethics?活体器官捐赠:是伦理的演变还是伦理观念的演变?
Int J Organ Transplant Med. 2010;1(2):57-62.
4
Kidney sales and the analogy with dangerous employment.肾脏买卖与危险职业的类比。
Health Care Anal. 2015 Jun;23(2):107-21. doi: 10.1007/s10728-013-0270-3.
5
Dualism in medicine, Christian theology, and the aging.医学、基督教神学和衰老中的二元论。
J Relig Health. 1996 Mar;35(1):33-45. doi: 10.1007/BF02354943.
6
The ethics of poverty and the poverty of ethics: the case of Palestinian prisoners in Israel seeking to sell their kidneys in order to feed their children.贫困的伦理与伦理的匮乏:以卖肾来养活孩子的以色列巴勒斯坦囚犯案例
J Med Ethics. 2007 Aug;33(8):473-4. doi: 10.1136/jme.2006.017855.
7
[Ideals of beauty and the medical manipulation of the body between free choice and coercion].
Ethik Med. 2006 Mar;18(1):71-80. doi: 10.1007/s00481-006-0415-0.
8
Brain donation for schizophrenia research: gift, consent, and meaning.用于精神分裂症研究的脑捐赠:馈赠、同意与意义。
J Med Ethics. 2003 Jun;29(3):165-8. doi: 10.1136/jme.29.3.165.
9
The ontological status of human DNA: is it not first and foremost a biological "file self"?人类DNA的本体论地位:它难道首先不就是一种生物学意义上的“文件自我”吗?
Theor Med Bioeth. 2002;23(4-5):377-95. doi: 10.1023/a:1021263520948.
10
An ethically defensible market in organs.一个在伦理上站得住脚的器官市场。
BMJ. 2002 Jul 20;325(7356):114-5. doi: 10.1136/bmj.325.7356.114.