Suppr超能文献

成人慢性耳鸣治疗建议的临床实践指南的分析和比较:系统评价。

Analysis and comparison of clinical practice guidelines regarding treatment recommendations for chronic tinnitus in adults: a systematic review.

机构信息

Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, UMC, Utrecht, Netherlands.

UMC Utrecht Brain Center, Utrecht, Netherlands.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2023 Sep 15;13(9):e072754. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-072754.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To determine if, and to what extent, published clinical practice guidelines for the treatment of chronic tinnitus vary in their recommendations.

DESIGN

Systematic review of guidelines.

DATA SOURCES

PubMed, EMBASE and GIN electronic databases were searched in March 2022 and the search was updated in June 2023.

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

We included clinical practice guidelines that gave recommendations on the treatment of tinnitus. No language restrictions were applied.

DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS

Two independent reviewers extracted the data and used the AGREE checklist to report on reporting.

RESULTS

A total of 10 guidelines were identified and included, published between 2011 and 2021. Recommendations for 13 types of tinnitus treatments were compared. Large differences in guideline development and methodology were found. Seven of the 10 guidelines included a systematic search of the literature to identify the available evidence. Six of the 10 guidelines used a framework for the development of the guideline. Reporting was poor in multiple guidelines. Counselling and cognitive behavioural therapy were the only treatments that were recommended for treating tinnitus associated distress by all guidelines that reported on these topics. Tinnitus retraining therapy, sound therapy, hearing aids and cochlear implantation were not unanimously recommended either due to the lack of evidence, a high risk of bias or judgement of no beneficial effect of the specific treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

There were notable differences with respect to whether guidelines considered the available evidence sufficient enough to make a recommendation. Notably, we identified substantial differences in the rigour of guideline design and development. Reporting was poor in many guidelines. Future guidelines could benefit from the use of reporting tools to improve reporting and transparency and the inclusion of guideline experts and patients to improve the quality of clinical practice guidelines on tinnitus.

摘要

目的

确定并评估已发表的慢性耳鸣治疗临床实践指南在推荐意见方面存在的差异及其程度。

设计

系统评价指南。

数据来源

2022 年 3 月检索 PubMed、EMBASE 和 GIN 电子数据库,并于 2023 年 6 月进行更新。

入选标准

纳入对耳鸣治疗提出建议的临床实践指南。未对语言进行限制。

数据提取和综合

两名独立的审查员提取数据,并使用 AGREE 清单报告报告情况。

结果

共确定并纳入 10 项指南,发表时间为 2011 年至 2021 年。比较了 13 种耳鸣治疗方法的推荐意见。发现指南制定和方法学方面存在较大差异。在 10 项指南中有 7 项指南包括对文献进行系统搜索以确定现有证据。10 项指南中有 6 项指南使用了指南制定框架。多项指南的报告情况较差。咨询和认知行为疗法是唯一被所有报告这些主题的指南推荐用于治疗耳鸣相关困扰的治疗方法。耳鸣再训练疗法、声音疗法、助听器和耳蜗植入由于缺乏证据、存在高偏倚风险或判断特定治疗无有益效果,因此未被一致推荐。

结论

在指南是否认为现有证据足以做出推荐方面存在明显差异。值得注意的是,我们发现指南设计和制定的严谨性存在显著差异。许多指南的报告情况较差。未来的指南可以从使用报告工具来提高报告的透明度和报告质量,以及纳入指南专家和患者来提高耳鸣临床实践指南的质量中受益。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d03f/10510943/081abd4d520d/bmjopen-2023-072754f01.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验