Rapoport J L, Donnelly M, Zametkin A, Carrougher J
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 1986 Sep;27(5):639-46. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.1986.tb00188.x.
Eight of 69 males referred to a Hyperactivity Clinic for participation in psychopharmacological trials were not rated hyperactive by their primary caretaker on a parent symptom questionnaire. In comparison to eight boys for whom both parent and teacher ratings of hyperactivity were high, the group differed only in caretaker status. 'Situational' children were less likely to be living with both biological parents (P less than 0.05). In contrast, direct observation and actometer measurement of activity did not differ significantly between the groups. The findings suggest that at least in clinical settings, a distinction between 'situational' and 'pervasive' hyperactivity reflects caretaker status or attitude and not characteristics of the child.
转介至多动症诊所参与精神药理学试验的69名男性中,有8名在家长症状问卷上未被其主要照顾者评定为多动。与8名家长和教师对多动的评定都很高的男孩相比,该组仅在照顾者状况方面有所不同。“情境性”儿童与亲生父母双方同住的可能性较小(P<0.05)。相比之下,两组之间在活动的直接观察和计步器测量方面没有显著差异。研究结果表明,至少在临床环境中,“情境性”和“普遍性”多动之间的区别反映的是照顾者的状况或态度,而非儿童的特征。