Suppr超能文献

孕晚期早期与晚期超声检查筛查小于胎龄儿:一项随机试验

Screening for small for gestational age infants in early vs late third-trimester ultrasonography: a randomized trial.

作者信息

Verspyck Eric, Thill Caroline, Ego Anne, Machevin Elise, Brasseur-Daudruy Marie, Ickowicz Valentine, Blondel Caroline, Degré Sophie, Lefebure Anne, Braund Sophia, Benichou Jacques

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Rouen University Hospital, Rouen, France (Drs Verspyck, Brasseur-Daudruy, Braund, and Benichou).

Department of Biostatistics, Rouen University Hospital, Rouen, France (Dr Thill).

出版信息

Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2023 Nov;5(11):101162. doi: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2023.101162. Epub 2023 Sep 15.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Recent studies have demonstrated that a routine third-trimester ultrasound scan may improve the detection of small for gestational age infants when compared with clinically indicated ultrasound scans but with no reported reduction in severe perinatal morbidity. Establishing the optimal gestational age for the third-trimester examination necessitates evaluation of the ability to detect small for gestational age infants and to predict maternal and perinatal outcomes. Intrauterine growth restriction most often corresponds with small for gestational age infants associated with pathologic growth patterns.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to assess the performance of routine early ultrasound scans vs late ultrasound scans during the third trimester of pregnancy to identify small for gestational age infants and fetuses with intrauterine growth restriction.

STUDY DESIGN

This was an open-label, randomized, parallel trial conducted in Upper Normandy, France, from 2012 to 2015. The study eligibility criteria were heathy, nulliparous women older than 18 years with gestational age determined using the crown-rump length at the first trimester routine scan and with no fetal malformation or suspected small for gestational age fetus at the routine second trimester scan. Pregnant women were randomly assigned to a third-trimester scan group at 31 weeks gestational age ±6 days (early ultrasound scan) or at 35 weeks gestational age ±6 days (late ultrasound scan). The primary outcome of this trial was the ability of a third trimester scan to predict small for gestational age infants (customized birth weight <10th percentile) and intrauterine growth restriction (customized birth weight <third percentile) using birth weight as the gold standard. The purpose of these adjustments was to optimize the detection of fetal weight associated with pathologic growth patterns. It was calculated that a sample size of 3720 women would be required to obtain 80% power at a 2-sided level of 0.05 with a 15% difference in sensitivity between the 2 intervention group to detect small for gestational age fetuses in favor of the late ultrasound scan group and considering that small for gestational age infants would represent 10% of all live births. Secondary outcomes were maternal and perinatal morbidities with interventions reported. The analysis was based on the intention-to-treat principle.

RESULTS

Results from 1853 women assigned to the early ultrasound scan group and 1848 women assigned to the late ultrasound scan group were analyzed. The sensitivity was found to be higher in the late ultrasound scan group than in the early ultrasound scan group, both for identifying small for gestational age infants (27%; 22%-32% vs 17%; 13%-22%; P=.004) and intrauterine growth restriction (44%; 35%-54% vs 18%; 11%-27%; P<.001). There was little difference in the specificity between the late ultrasound scan and early ultrasound scan groups in identifying cases of small for gestational age (97%; 96%-98% and 98%; 97%-99%, respectively; P=.04) and intrauterine growth restriction (96%; 95%-97% and 97%; 96%;-97%, respectively; P=.24). Overall, the maternal and neonatal outcomes were comparable between the early ultrasound scan and late ultrasound scan groups with the exception of additional (at least 1) ultrasound scans performed (25% in the early ultrasound scan group vs 19% in the late ultrasound scan group; P<.001). Rates of perinatal death (0.4% vs 0.8%; P=.12) and adverse perinatal outcomes (1.8% vs 2.7%; P=.08) were comparable between the early ultrasound scan and late ultrasound scan assigned groups, and the overall sensitivity to detect small for gestational age infants and intrauterine growth restriction, including in the last ultrasound scan performed before delivery, were also similar (30%; 25%-36% vs 26%; 21%-31%; P=.23; and 50%; 40%-60% vs 38%; 28%-48%; P=.07).

CONCLUSION

A late ultrasound scan performed in the third trimester increases the probability of detecting small for gestational age infants and intrauterine growth restriction with fewer additional scans reported than for the early ultrasound scan group. The overall perinatal outcome risk was comparable between the 2 groups. However, the overall sensitivity for detecting small for gestational age fetuses and intrauterine growth restriction, including in the last ultrasound scan performed before delivery, remains comparable between the late ultrasound scan and early ultrasound scan groups.

摘要

背景

最近的研究表明,与临床指征性超声检查相比,妊娠晚期常规超声检查可能会提高对小于胎龄儿的检出率,但未报告严重围产期发病率有所降低。确定妊娠晚期检查的最佳孕周需要评估检测小于胎龄儿以及预测孕产妇和围产期结局的能力。宫内生长受限通常与具有病理生长模式的小于胎龄儿相关。

目的

本研究旨在评估妊娠晚期常规早期超声检查与晚期超声检查在识别小于胎龄儿和宫内生长受限胎儿方面的性能。

研究设计

这是一项2012年至2015年在法国上诺曼底进行的开放标签、随机、平行试验。研究纳入标准为年龄超过18岁的健康初产妇,通过孕早期常规扫描时的头臀长确定孕周,且在孕中期常规扫描时无胎儿畸形或疑似小于胎龄胎儿。孕妇被随机分配到孕31周±6天的妊娠晚期扫描组(早期超声检查)或孕35周±6天的妊娠晚期扫描组(晚期超声检查)。本试验的主要结局是以出生体重作为金标准,妊娠晚期扫描预测小于胎龄儿(定制出生体重<第10百分位数)和宫内生长受限(定制出生体重<第3百分位数)的能力。这些调整的目的是优化对与病理生长模式相关的胎儿体重的检测。经计算,需要3720名女性的样本量,以在双侧0.05水平上获得80%的检验效能,两个干预组在检测小于胎龄胎儿方面的敏感性相差15%,有利于晚期超声检查组,且考虑到小于胎龄儿占所有活产的10%。次要结局是报告干预措施后的孕产妇和围产期发病率。分析基于意向性分析原则。

结果

对分配到早期超声检查组的1853名女性和分配到晚期超声检查组的1848名女性的结果进行了分析。发现晚期超声检查组在识别小于胎龄儿(27%;22%-32%对17%;13%-22%;P=0.004)和宫内生长受限(44%;35%-54%对18%;11%-27%;P<0.001)方面的敏感性高于早期超声检查组。晚期超声检查和早期超声检查组在识别小于胎龄(分别为97%;96%-98%和98%;97%-99%;P=0.04)和宫内生长受限(分别为96%;95%-97%和97%;96%-97%;P=0.24)病例的特异性方面差异不大。总体而言,早期超声检查组和晚期超声检查组的孕产妇和新生儿结局相当,但早期超声检查组进行额外(至少1次)超声检查的比例更高(25%对19%;P<0.001)。早期超声检查组和晚期超声检查组的围产期死亡率(0.4%对0.8%;P=0.12)和不良围产期结局(1.8%对2.7%;P=0.08)相当,且检测小于胎龄儿和宫内生长受限的总体敏感性,包括在分娩前进行的最后一次超声检查中,也相似(30%;25%-36%对26%;21%-31%;P=0.23;以及50%;40%-60%对38%;28%-48%;P=0.07)。

结论

妊娠晚期进行的晚期超声检查增加了检测小于胎龄儿和宫内生长受限的可能性,且报告的额外检查次数少于早期超声检查组。两组的总体围产期结局风险相当。然而,晚期超声检查组和早期超声检查组在检测小于胎龄胎儿和宫内生长受限的总体敏感性方面,包括在分娩前进行的最后一次超声检查中,仍然相当。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验