通过体外受精进行植入前性别选择：是时候重新评估了。
Preimplantation sex selection via in vitro fertilization: time for a reappraisal.
作者信息
Kushnir Vitaly A, Adashi Eli Y, Cohen I Glenn
机构信息
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of California Irvine, Orange, California.
Division of Medicine and Biological Sciences, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island.
出版信息
F S Rep. 2023 May 26;4(3):241-243. doi: 10.1016/j.xfre.2023.05.006. eCollection 2023 Sep.
Abstract
In recent years, there has been rapid increase in the availability of elective sex selection via genetic testing of preimplantation embryos created through in vitro fertilization. We explore the standing of this ethically controversial practice in the context of a changing legal landscape after the Dobbs v Jackson Women's Health decision by the US Supreme Court.
摘要
近年来，通过对体外受精产生的植入前胚胎进行基因检测来进行选择性别的情况迅速增加。我们在美国最高法院做出多布斯诉杰克逊妇女健康案裁决后法律环境不断变化的背景下，探讨这种存在伦理争议的做法的现状。
相似文献
1
Preimplantation sex selection via in vitro fertilization: time for a reappraisal.通过体外受精进行植入前性别选择：是时候重新评估了。
F S Rep. 2023 May 26;4(3):241-243. doi: 10.1016/j.xfre.2023.05.006. eCollection 2023 Sep.
2
Post-Dobbs legal conundrums surrounding preimplantation in vitro fertilization embryo dispositions.多布斯案之后围绕体外受精胚胎处置前的法律难题。
Fertil Steril. 2023 Jan;119(1):21-26. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2022.10.033. Epub 2022 Dec 7.
3
The Dobbs v Jackson Women's Health Organization Supreme Court Decision-Concerns, Challenges, and Consequences for Health Care.多布斯诉杰克逊妇女健康组织案最高法院判决——对医疗保健的担忧、挑战及后果
JAMA Surg. 2023 Mar 1;158(3):229-230. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2022.5714.
4
Roe v Wade and the Threat to Fertility Care.罗诉韦德案与生育医疗面临的威胁。
Obstet Gynecol. 2022 Oct 1;140(4):557-559. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000004928. Epub 2022 Jul 20.
5
Trends in Abortion- and Contraception-Related Internet Searches After the US Supreme Court Overturned Constitutional Abortion Rights: How Much Do State Laws Matter?美国最高法院推翻宪法堕胎权后，与堕胎和避孕相关的互联网搜索趋势：州法律有多大影响？
JAMA Health Forum. 2023 Apr 7;4(4):e230518. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2023.0518.
6
Politics of reproduction: a view from Israel on the Dobbs decision.生殖政治：多布斯裁决的以色列视角
Isr J Health Policy Res. 2023 Jan 24;12(1):3. doi: 10.1186/s13584-022-00550-9.
7
Requests for Self-managed Medication Abortion Provided Using Online Telemedicine in 30 US States Before and After the Dobbs v Jackson Women's Health Organization Decision.在多布斯诉杰克逊妇女健康组织案裁决前后，美国30个州通过在线远程医疗提供自我管理药物流产的申请情况。
JAMA. 2022 Nov 1;328(17):1768-1770. doi: 10.1001/jama.2022.18865.
8
Society for Medical Anthropology Statement on Supreme Court Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization Decision.医学人类学学会就最高法院多布斯诉杰克逊妇女健康组织案的声明
Med Anthropol Q. 2022 Dec;36(4):433-441. doi: 10.1111/maq.12741. Epub 2022 Nov 26.
9
The death of and the future of embryos.胚胎的死亡与未来。 （你提供的原文中“and the future of”前面似乎少了内容，比如具体是什么的死亡与未来，我按照字面进行了翻译）
J Law Biosci. 2022 Jul 3;9(2):lsac019. doi: 10.1093/jlb/lsac019. eCollection 2022 Jul-Dec.
10
Obstacles to Care Mount 1 Year After Dobbs Decision.多布斯案裁决一年后，医疗护理面临的障碍增多。
JAMA. 2023 Jul 11;330(2):119-120. doi: 10.1001/jama.2023.10151.
引用本文的文献
1
Reproductive options and genetic testing for patients with an inherited cardiac disease.患有遗传性心脏病患者的生殖选择与基因检测
Nat Rev Cardiol. 2025 Mar;22(3):199-211. doi: 10.1038/s41569-024-01073-3. Epub 2024 Sep 17.
2
Best quality vs. sex selection - an analysis of embryo selection preferences for patients undergoing preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy over a 10-year period.最佳质量与性别选择——对 10 年间接受胚胎植入前遗传学检测非整倍体的患者胚胎选择偏好的分析。
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2024 Aug;41(8):2211-2216. doi: 10.1007/s10815-024-03162-1. Epub 2024 Jun 24.
3
Mapping ethical, legal, and social implications (ELSI) of preimplantation genetic testing (PGT).绘制胚胎植入前遗传学检测（PGT）的伦理、法律和社会影响（ELSI）图谱。
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2024 May;41(5):1153-1171. doi: 10.1007/s10815-024-03076-y. Epub 2024 Mar 21.
本文引用的文献
1
Roe v Wade and the Threat to Fertility Care.罗诉韦德案与生育医疗面临的威胁。
Obstet Gynecol. 2022 Oct 1;140(4):557-559. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000004928. Epub 2022 Jul 20.
2
What Overturning Roe v Wade May Mean for Assisted Reproductive Technologies in the US.推翻罗诉韦德案对美国辅助生殖技术可能意味着什么。
JAMA. 2022 Jul 5;328(1):15-16. doi: 10.1001/jama.2022.10163.
3
Trends and Outcomes for Preimplantation Genetic Testing in the United States, 2014-2018.2014-2018 年美国胚胎植入前遗传学检测的趋势和结果。
JAMA. 2022 Apr 5;327(13):1288-1290. doi: 10.1001/jama.2022.1892.
4
State-Mandated Insurance Coverage and Preimplantation Genetic Testing in the United States.美国的州政府强制保险覆盖范围和胚胎植入前遗传学检测。
Obstet Gynecol. 2022 Apr 1;139(4):500-508. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000004712. Epub 2022 Mar 10.
5
Use of reproductive technology for sex selection for nonmedical reasons: an Ethics Committee opinion.出于非医学原因选择性别而使用生殖技术：伦理委员会意见。
Fertil Steril. 2022 Apr;117(4):720-726. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2021.12.024. Epub 2022 Jan 31.
6
The Future of IVF: The New Normal in Human Reproduction.体外受精的未来：人类生殖的新常态。
Reprod Sci. 2022 Mar;29(3):849-856. doi: 10.1007/s43032-021-00829-3. Epub 2022 Jan 3.
7
Disclosure of sex when incidentally revealed as part of preimplantation genetic testing (PGT): an Ethics Committee opinion.偶然在着床前遗传学检测（PGT）中发现时披露性别：伦理委员会意见。
Fertil Steril. 2018 Sep;110(4):625-627. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2018.06.019.
8
Assessing the use of assisted reproductive technology in the United States by non-United States residents.评估非美国居民在美国使用辅助生殖技术的情况。
Fertil Steril. 2017 Nov;108(5):815-821. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2017.07.1168. Epub 2017 Sep 12.
9
Outcomes of in vitro fertilization with preimplantation genetic diagnosis: an analysis of the United States Assisted Reproductive Technology Surveillance Data, 2011-2012.植入前基因诊断的体外受精结局：对2011 - 2012年美国辅助生殖技术监测数据的分析
Fertil Steril. 2016 Feb;105(2):394-400. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.10.018. Epub 2015 Nov 6.
10
Use of reproductive technology for sex selection for nonmedical reasons.非医学原因的性别选择的生殖技术应用。
Fertil Steril. 2015 Jun;103(6):1418-22. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.03.035. Epub 2015 May 5.
Zotero 插件