• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

WaveOne Gold® 单根管锉治疗后三种冲洗激活方法对玷污层和碎屑清除效率的比较

Comparison of Three Activating Methods of Irrigation on Smear Layer- and Debris-Removal Efficiency After WaveOne Gold® Single File.

作者信息

Jabbour Edgard, Sabbagh Joseph, Koyess Edmond, Feghali Maya

机构信息

Department of Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Lebanese University, Beirut, Lebanon.

出版信息

Acta Inform Med. 2023 Jun;31(2):131-136. doi: 10.5455/aim.2023.31.131-136.

DOI:10.5455/aim.2023.31.131-136
PMID:37719232
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10503892/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

An endodontic treatment consists in cleaning, shaping and filling the root canal system. Irrigation is the chemical part of the process that ensures the total removal of debris. Activating the irrigation solution will improve and accelerate the process.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study is to evaluate the removal of debris and smear layer at 1, 3, and 5mm from the foramen after needle irrigation, EndoActivator® and Irrisafe®. Sixty single-rooted teeth were prepared using Primary WaveOne Gold®.

METHODS

Teeth were randomly assigned to 4 groups (n=15): needle irrigation - Group A, EndoActivator® for 1 min - Group B, Irrisafe® for 1 min - Group C, Irrisafe® for 30 sec - Group D. Root canals were observed under a scanning electron microscope. Data were analyzed by Friedman and Wilcoxon tests.

RESULTS

Debris was significantly higher with group A compared to B, C, and D. Irrisafe® was significantly more effective in removing the smear layer than the other groups. However, activation techniques showed less debris and smear layer than needle alone nevertheless.

CONCLUSION

Irrisafe® showed the best results regardless of time.

摘要

背景

根管治疗包括清洁、塑形和充填根管系统。冲洗是该过程的化学部分,可确保彻底清除碎屑。激活冲洗液将改善并加速这一过程。

目的

本研究的目的是评估在使用针管冲洗、EndoActivator® 和 Irrisafe® 后,距根尖孔1、3和5毫米处碎屑和玷污层的清除情况。使用初代WaveOne Gold® 预备60颗单根牙。

方法

将牙齿随机分为4组(每组n = 15):针管冲洗 - A组、EndoActivator® 冲洗1分钟 - B组、Irrisafe® 冲洗1分钟 - C组、Irrisafe® 冲洗30秒 - D组。在扫描电子显微镜下观察根管。数据采用Friedman和Wilcoxon检验进行分析。

结果

与B、C和D组相比,A组的碎屑明显更多。Irrisafe® 在去除玷污层方面比其他组显著更有效。然而,激活技术显示出的碎屑和玷污层仍比单独使用针管冲洗时少。

结论

无论时间长短,Irrisafe® 均显示出最佳效果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1583/10503892/6b466269a811/AIM-31-131-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1583/10503892/6b466269a811/AIM-31-131-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1583/10503892/6b466269a811/AIM-31-131-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparison of Three Activating Methods of Irrigation on Smear Layer- and Debris-Removal Efficiency After WaveOne Gold® Single File.WaveOne Gold® 单根管锉治疗后三种冲洗激活方法对玷污层和碎屑清除效率的比较
Acta Inform Med. 2023 Jun;31(2):131-136. doi: 10.5455/aim.2023.31.131-136.
2
Scanning electron microscopy evaluation of debris and smear layer generated by two instruments used in reciprocating motion WaveOne Gold® and Reciproc Blue®.扫描电子显微镜评估往复运动中使用的两种器械WaveOne Gold®和Reciproc Blue®产生的碎屑和玷污层。
Aust Endod J. 2019 Dec;45(3):388-393. doi: 10.1111/aej.12338. Epub 2019 Feb 15.
3
Efficacy of Different Irrigant Activation Systems on Debris and Smear Layer Removal: A Scanning Electron Microscopy Evaluation.不同冲洗液激活系统对碎屑和玷污层清除效果的扫描电子显微镜评估
Int J Dent. 2023 Sep 20;2023:9933524. doi: 10.1155/2023/9933524. eCollection 2023.
4
Debris and Smear Layer Removal from Oval Root Canals Comparing XP-Endo Finisher, EndoActivator, and Manual Irrigation: A SEM Evaluation.比较XP根管锉、根管激活器和手动冲洗对椭圆形根管内碎屑和玷污层的去除效果:扫描电子显微镜评估
Eur J Dent. 2020 Oct;14(4):626-633. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1714762. Epub 2020 Aug 10.
5
Effectiveness of various irrigation activation protocols and the self-adjusting file system on smear layer and debris removal.各种冲洗激活方案和自调式锉系统在去除玷污层和碎屑方面的有效性。
Scanning. 2014 Nov-Dec;36(6):640-7. doi: 10.1002/sca.21171. Epub 2014 Oct 6.
6
Effectiveness of XP-endo Finisher, EndoActivator, and File agitation on debris and smear layer removal in curved root canals: a comparative study.XP-endo Finisher、EndoActivator和锉动法在弯曲根管中清除碎屑和玷污层的效果:一项对比研究。
Odontology. 2017 Apr;105(2):178-183. doi: 10.1007/s10266-016-0251-8. Epub 2016 May 20.
7
Debris and Smear Layer Removal in Curved Root Canals: A Comparative Study of Ultrasonic and Sonic Irrigant Activation Techniques.弯曲根管内碎屑和玷污层的去除:超声和声波冲洗激活技术的比较研究
Dent J (Basel). 2024 Feb 26;12(3):51. doi: 10.3390/dj12030051.
8
Comparison of the efficacy of Smear Clear with and without a canal brush in smear layer and debris removal from instrumented root canal using WaveOne versus ProTaper: a scanning electron microscopic study.使用WaveOne与ProTaper比较带与不带根管刷的Smear Clear在去除预备根管的玷污层和碎屑方面的效果:一项扫描电子显微镜研究
J Endod. 2014 Mar;40(3):446-50. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2013.09.028. Epub 2013 Nov 1.
9
SEM Evaluation of Various Intracanal Irrigation Devices on Smear Layer Removal: A Comparative Study.SEM 评价不同根管冲洗设备对玷污层去除的效果:一项对比研究。
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2021 Feb 1;22(2):184-188.
10
The Effectiveness of Different Irrigation Techniques on Debris and Smear Layer Removal in Primary Mandibular Second Molars: An Study.不同冲洗技术对下颌第二磨牙原发性感染根管内玷污层和碎屑去除效果的研究。
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2022 Nov 1;23(11):1173-1179. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-3440.

本文引用的文献

1
Scanning electron microscopy evaluation of debris and smear layer generated by two instruments used in reciprocating motion WaveOne Gold® and Reciproc Blue®.扫描电子显微镜评估往复运动中使用的两种器械WaveOne Gold®和Reciproc Blue®产生的碎屑和玷污层。
Aust Endod J. 2019 Dec;45(3):388-393. doi: 10.1111/aej.12338. Epub 2019 Feb 15.
2
Smear Layer Removal Efficacy of Two Activated Irrigation Techniques After Reciprocating Instrumentation in Curved Canals.两种活化冲洗技术在弯曲根管内使用往复式器械预备后对玷污层的去除效果
Open Dent J. 2017 Oct 16;11:512-519. doi: 10.2174/1874210601711010512. eCollection 2017.
3
Efficiency of Different Endodontic Irrigation and Activation Systems in Removal of the Smear Layer: A Scanning Electron Microscopy Study.
不同根管冲洗和激活系统去除玷污层的效率:一项扫描电子显微镜研究
Iran Endod J. 2017 Fall;12(4):414-418. doi: 10.22037/iej.v12i4.9571.
4
FESEM evaluation of smear layer removal using different irrigant activation methods (EndoActivator, EndoVac, PUI and LAI). An in vitro study.使用不同冲洗液激活方法(EndoActivator、EndoVac、PUI 和 LAI)清除玷污层的 FESEM 评估。一项体外研究。
Clin Oral Investig. 2018 Mar;22(2):993-999. doi: 10.1007/s00784-017-2179-y. Epub 2017 Jul 18.
5
Current Assessment of Reciprocation in Endodontic Preparation: A Comprehensive Review--Part II: Properties and Effectiveness.根管预备中往复运动的当前评估:全面综述——第二部分:特性与有效性
J Endod. 2015 Dec;41(12):1939-50. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2015.08.018. Epub 2015 Oct 23.
6
Comparison of different irrigation activation techniques on smear layer removal: an in vitro study.不同冲洗激活技术对玷污层去除效果的比较:一项体外研究
Microsc Res Tech. 2015 Mar;78(3):230-9. doi: 10.1002/jemt.22466. Epub 2015 Jan 12.
7
3D mapping of the irrigated areas of the root canal space using micro-computed tomography.使用微型计算机断层扫描对根管空间的冲洗区域进行三维映射。
Clin Oral Investig. 2015 May;19(4):859-66. doi: 10.1007/s00784-014-1311-5. Epub 2014 Sep 4.
8
Deformation and fracture incidence of Reciproc instruments: a clinical evaluation.Reciproc器械的变形与折断发生率:一项临床评估
Int Endod J. 2015 Feb;48(2):199-205. doi: 10.1111/iej.12302. Epub 2014 Jun 28.
9
Effectiveness of passive ultrasonic irrigation in improving elimination of smear layer and opening dentinal tubules.被动超声冲洗在改善玷污层清除及开放牙本质小管方面的有效性。
J Clin Exp Dent. 2014 Feb 1;6(1):e47-52. doi: 10.4317/jced.51297. eCollection 2014 Feb.
10
Smear layer removal and canal cleanliness using different irrigation systems (EndoActivator, EndoVac, and passive ultrasonic irrigation): field emission scanning electron microscopic evaluation in an in vitro study.使用不同冲洗系统(EndoActivator、EndoVac和被动超声冲洗)去除玷污层和清洁根管:一项体外研究的场发射扫描电子显微镜评估
J Endod. 2013 Nov;39(11):1456-60. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2013.07.028. Epub 2013 Sep 6.