Suppr超能文献

由机器人操控:从手术室到法庭——机器人手术的法医学考量

In the Hands of a Robot, From the Operating Room to the Courtroom: The Medicolegal Considerations of Robotic Surgery.

作者信息

Pai Satvik N, Jeyaraman Madhan, Jeyaraman Naveen, Nallakumarasamy Arulkumar, Yadav Sankalp

机构信息

Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Orthopedics, Sports Medicine, Arthritis, and Trauma (HOSMAT) Hospital, Bangalore, IND.

Orthopaedics, ACS Medical College and Hospital, Dr. MGR Educational and Research Institute, Chennai, IND.

出版信息

Cureus. 2023 Aug 17;15(8):e43634. doi: 10.7759/cureus.43634. eCollection 2023 Aug.

Abstract

Robotic surgery has rapidly evolved as a groundbreaking field in medicine, revolutionizing surgical practices across various specialties. Despite its numerous benefits, the adoption of robotic surgery faces significant medicolegal challenges. This article delves into the underexplored legal implications of robotic surgery and identifies three distinct medicolegal problems. First, the lack of standardized training and credentialing for robotic surgery poses potential risks to patient safety and surgeon competence. Second, informed consent processes require additional considerations to ensure patients are fully aware of the technology's capabilities and potential risks. Finally, the issue of legal liability becomes complex due to the involvement of multiple stakeholders in the functioning of robotic systems. The article highlights the need for comprehensive guidelines, regulations, and training programs to navigate the medicolegal aspects of robotic surgery effectively, thereby unlocking its full potential for the future..

摘要

机器人手术作为医学领域的一个开创性领域迅速发展,正在彻底改变各个专科的手术实践。尽管有诸多益处,但机器人手术的应用面临重大的法医学挑战。本文深入探讨了机器人手术未被充分研究的法律影响,并确定了三个不同的法医学问题。首先,机器人手术缺乏标准化培训和资质认证,对患者安全和外科医生的能力构成潜在风险。其次,知情同意程序需要额外考虑,以确保患者充分了解该技术的能力和潜在风险。最后,由于机器人系统运行涉及多个利益相关者,法律责任问题变得复杂。本文强调需要全面的指南、法规和培训计划,以有效应对机器人手术的法医学问题,从而充分释放其未来的全部潜力。

相似文献

1
In the Hands of a Robot, From the Operating Room to the Courtroom: The Medicolegal Considerations of Robotic Surgery.
Cureus. 2023 Aug 17;15(8):e43634. doi: 10.7759/cureus.43634. eCollection 2023 Aug.
3
Medicolegal review of liability risks for gynecologists stemming from lack of training in robot-assisted surgery.
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2011 Jul-Aug;18(4):512-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2011.04.002.
5
Legal and ethical issues in robotic surgery.
Int Angiol. 2010 Feb;29(1):75-9.
6
Survey on Robot-Assisted Surgical Techniques Utilization in US Pediatric Surgery Fellowships.
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2017 Feb;27(2):186-190. doi: 10.1089/lap.2016.0237. Epub 2016 Oct 31.
7
Safety, efficiency and learning curves in robotic surgery: a human factors analysis.
Surg Endosc. 2016 Sep;30(9):3749-61. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4671-2. Epub 2015 Dec 16.
8
Best Practices for Robotic Surgery Programs.
JSLS. 2017 Apr-Jun;21(2). doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2016.00102.
9
Toward versatile cooperative surgical robotics: a review and future challenges.
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2019 Oct;14(10):1673-1686. doi: 10.1007/s11548-019-01927-z. Epub 2019 Mar 4.
10
Advancements in Robotic Surgery: A Comprehensive Overview of Current Utilizations and Upcoming Frontiers.
Cureus. 2023 Dec 12;15(12):e50415. doi: 10.7759/cureus.50415. eCollection 2023 Dec.

引用本文的文献

1
ACPGBI position statement on robotic-assisted colorectal surgical training.
Colorectal Dis. 2025 Jul;27(7):e70161. doi: 10.1111/codi.70161.
2
A Narrative Review of the Evolving Role of Robotic Surgery in Pediatrics: Innovations and Future Prospects.
Cureus. 2025 Mar 11;17(3):e80419. doi: 10.7759/cureus.80419. eCollection 2025 Mar.
3
How effective and sustainable is proctoring in robotic surgery? A retrospective analysis based on interviews with surgeons.
Surg Endosc. 2025 Mar;39(3):1985-1995. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-11503-5. Epub 2025 Jan 30.
4
Malpractice or masterful practice? Navigating vicarious liability in healthcare.
World J Clin Cases. 2025 Jan 16;13(2):99071. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v13.i2.99071.
5
The AI Orthopedician will see you now - But who is Liable if it's Wrong?
J Orthop Case Rep. 2024 Dec;14(12):1-3. doi: 10.13107/jocr.2024.v14.i12.4994.
6
Doctor, Bot, or Both: Questioning the Medicolegal Liability of Artificial Intelligence in Indian Healthcare.
Cureus. 2024 Sep 11;16(9):e69230. doi: 10.7759/cureus.69230. eCollection 2024 Sep.
7
Robotic colorectal surgery training: Portsmouth perspective.
Ann Coloproctol. 2024 Aug;40(4):350-362. doi: 10.3393/ac.2024.00444.0063. Epub 2024 Aug 30.
9
Online videos of robotic-assisted cholecystectomies: more harm than good?
Surg Endosc. 2024 Sep;38(9):5023-5029. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-11054-9. Epub 2024 Jul 15.
10
Beyond Blame: Is India Ready for No-Fault Liability in Healthcare?
Cureus. 2024 Apr 12;16(4):e58111. doi: 10.7759/cureus.58111. eCollection 2024 Apr.

本文引用的文献

1
Human and machine drivers: Sharing control, sharing responsibility.
Accid Anal Prev. 2023 Aug;188:107096. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2023.107096. Epub 2023 May 4.
2
Evidence-based informed consent form for total knee arthroplasty.
J Orthop Surg Res. 2023 Mar 2;18(1):156. doi: 10.1186/s13018-023-03647-2.
3
Legally Sound, Evidence-Based Informed Consent Form for Total Hip Arthroplasty.
Indian J Orthop. 2023 Jan 18;57(3):421-428. doi: 10.1007/s43465-023-00824-7. eCollection 2023 Mar.
4
Robotics and cybersurgery in ophthalmology: a current perspective.
J Robot Surg. 2023 Aug;17(4):1159-1170. doi: 10.1007/s11701-023-01532-y. Epub 2023 Jan 13.
6
Autonomous surgical robotic systems and the liability dilemma.
Front Surg. 2022 Sep 16;9:1015367. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.1015367. eCollection 2022.
7
Training and credentialing in Robotic Surgery in India: Current perspectives.
J Minim Access Surg. 2022 Oct-Dec;18(4):497-504. doi: 10.4103/jmas.jmas_348_21.
8
Industry 5.0 in Orthopaedics.
Indian J Orthop. 2022 Aug 23;56(10):1694-1702. doi: 10.1007/s43465-022-00712-6. eCollection 2022 Oct.
9
Drivers of partially automated vehicles are blamed for crashes that they cannot reasonably avoid.
Sci Rep. 2022 Sep 28;12(1):16193. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-19876-0.
10
The transferability of laparoscopic and open surgical skills to robotic surgery.
Adv Simul (Lond). 2022 Sep 5;7(1):26. doi: 10.1186/s41077-022-00223-2.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验