• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

南卡罗来纳州六家医院实施“选择退出”烟草治疗项目。

Implementation of an "Opt-Out" Tobacco Treatment Program in Six Hospitals in South Carolina.

作者信息

Cummings K Michael, Talbot Vincent, Roberson Avery, Bliss Asia A, Likins Emily, Brownstein Naomi C, Stansell Stephanie, Adams-Ludd Demetress, Harris Bridget, Louder David, McCutcheon Edward, Zebian Rami, Rojewski Alana, Toll Benjamin A

机构信息

Medical University of South Carolina.

TelASK Inc.

出版信息

Res Sq. 2023 Sep 8:rs.3.rs-3318088. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-3318088/v1.

DOI:10.21203/rs.3.rs-3318088/v1
PMID:37720041
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10503831/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To describe the implementation an opt-out tobacco treatment program (TTP) in 6 diverse hospitals located in different regions of South Carolina.

METHODS

Between March 8, 2021 and December 17, 2021, adult patients (≥ 18 years) admitted to 6 hospitals affiliated with the Medical University of South Carolina (MUSC) were screened for their cigarette status. Patients who smoked cigarettes were referred to an TTP offering a brief bedside consult and automated post-discharge follow-up calls with an opportunity to receive a referral to the South Carolina Quitline (SCQL). The hospitals included in this study ranged in size from 82 to 715 beds with diverse patient populations. Herein, we report on the results of screening and referring patients to the TTP, delivery of smoking cessation treatments, and patient smoking status assessed in a sample of patients followed 6-weeks after discharge from the hospital.

RESULTS

Smoking prevalence ranged from 14-49% across the 6 hospitals. Among eligible patients reached, 85.6% accepted the bedside consult. Only 3.4% of patients reached were deemed ineligible because they claimed not to be currently smoking cigarettes. The automated post-discharge follow-up calls were answered by 43% of patients, with about a third of those who had relapsed back to smoking accepting the offer of a referral to the SCQL. Overall, about half of the 6,000 patients referred to the TTP received some type of treatment. Self-reported smoking abstinence rates assessed 6-weeks after discharge were similar across the five acute care hospitals ranging from about 20-30%.

CONCLUSION

The findings demonstrate the broad reach of implementing an opt-out TTP for patients in hospitals of varying size, rurality and patient populations.

摘要

目的

描述在南卡罗来纳州不同地区的6家不同医院实施一项选择退出式烟草治疗项目(TTP)的情况。

方法

在2021年3月8日至2021年12月17日期间,对南卡罗来纳医科大学(MUSC)附属的6家医院收治的成年患者(≥18岁)进行吸烟状况筛查。吸烟的患者被转介至一个TTP,该项目提供简短的床边咨询以及出院后自动跟进电话,并提供转介至南卡罗来纳戒烟热线(SCQL)的机会。本研究纳入的医院规模从82张床位到715张床位不等,患者群体多样。在此,我们报告对患者进行筛查并转介至TTP的结果、戒烟治疗的提供情况,以及在出院6周后随访的患者样本中评估的患者吸烟状况。

结果

6家医院的吸烟率在14%至49%之间。在被联系到的符合条件的患者中,85.6%接受了床边咨询。被联系到的患者中只有3.4%被认为不符合条件,因为他们声称目前不吸烟。43%的患者接听了出院后自动跟进电话,其中约三分之一复吸的患者接受了转介至SCQL的提议。总体而言,转介至TTP的6000名患者中约有一半接受了某种类型的治疗。在五家急性护理医院中,出院6周后自我报告的戒烟率相似,约为20%至30%。

结论

研究结果表明,为不同规模、不同乡村程度和不同患者群体的医院中的患者实施选择退出式TTP具有广泛的覆盖范围。

相似文献

1
Implementation of an "Opt-Out" Tobacco Treatment Program in Six Hospitals in South Carolina.南卡罗来纳州六家医院实施“选择退出”烟草治疗项目。
Res Sq. 2023 Sep 8:rs.3.rs-3318088. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-3318088/v1.
2
Implementation of an "opt-out" tobacco treatment program in six hospitals in South Carolina.在南卡罗来纳州的六家医院实施“选择退出”烟草治疗计划。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Jun 17;24(1):741. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11205-7.
3
Feasibility of Implementing a Hospital-Based "Opt-Out" Tobacco-Cessation Service.实施基于医院的“选择退出”戒烟服务的可行性。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2017 Aug 1;19(8):937-943. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntw312.
4
Implementation, enrollment, and engagement in an opt-out telehealth pharmacist-assisted tobacco treatment program for patients seen in oncology outpatient clinics.在肿瘤门诊就诊的患者中实施、登记和参与一种选择退出的远程医疗药师辅助烟草治疗计划。
Cancer. 2024 Jul 15;130(14):2482-2492. doi: 10.1002/cncr.35291. Epub 2024 Mar 28.
5
Tobacco Use Prevalence and Outcomes Among Perinatal Patients Assessed Through an "Opt-out" Cessation and Follow-Up Clinical Program.通过“选择退出”戒烟及随访临床项目评估的围产期患者的烟草使用流行情况及结局
Matern Child Health J. 2017 Sep;21(9):1790-1797. doi: 10.1007/s10995-017-2309-9.
6
Comparative Effectiveness of Postdischarge Smoking Cessation Interventions for Hospital Patients: The Helping HAND 4 Randomized Clinical Trial.比较出院后戒烟干预措施对住院患者的效果:HELPING HAND 4 随机临床试验。
JAMA Intern Med. 2022 Aug 1;182(8):814-824. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2022.2300.
7
Health and economic effects from linking bedside and outpatient tobacco cessation services for hospitalized smokers in two large hospitals: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.将住院吸烟者的床边和门诊戒烟服务相连接对健康和经济的影响:两项大型医院随机对照试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2012 Aug 1;13:129. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-13-129.
8
Can inpatient pharmacists move the needle on smoking cessation? Evaluating reach and representativeness of a pharmacist-led opt-out smoking cessation intervention protocol for hospital settings.住院药剂师能在戒烟方面有所作为吗?评估针对医院环境的由药剂师主导的退出式戒烟干预方案的覆盖范围和代表性。
Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2022 Jun 7;79(12):969-978. doi: 10.1093/ajhp/zxab488.
9
Comparative effectiveness of post-discharge strategies for hospitalized smokers: Study protocol for the Helping HAND 4 randomized controlled trial.比较住院吸烟者出院后策略的有效性:帮助 HAND 4 随机对照试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2020 Apr 16;21(1):336. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04257-7.
10
Evaluation of a Systems-Based Tobacco Cessation Program Using Bedside Volunteers.利用床边志愿者评估基于系统的戒烟计划。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2020 Mar 16;22(3):440-445. doi: 10.1093/ntr/nty252.