Suppr超能文献

肱动脉途径在肝动脉灌注化疗治疗中的可行性和安全性:一项回顾性研究。

The feasibility and safety of the brachial artery approach in the treatment of hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy: a retrospective study.

作者信息

Xiong Jian, Zhou Yanyan, Tan Kai, Liu Haofeng, Cao Yunbao, Liu Junde, Wu Wenhao, Du Xilin, Luo Zhonghua

机构信息

Department of Interventional Radiology, Tangdu Hospital, The Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, China.

Department of General Surgery, Tangdu Hospital, The Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, China.

出版信息

J Gastrointest Oncol. 2023 Aug 31;14(4):1830-1836. doi: 10.21037/jgo-23-523. Epub 2023 Aug 30.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Compared to hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) treatment through the femoral artery (TFA), the brachial artery (TBA) is more flexible and easier for patients to accept. However, the feasibility of TBA has not been studied yet. This study aims to evaluate the feasibility and safety of HAIC via the TBA.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 63 patients with primary liver cancer who were treated with HAIC via TBA. In this study, a total of 163 HAIC procedures were performed via the left brachial artery pathway, and each patient underwent an average of 2.59 procedures. One patient received 5 treatments, 18 patients received 4 treatments, 15 patients received 3 treatments, 12 patients received 2 treatments, and 17 patients received 1 treatment. The main evaluation indicators were the technical success rate and complication rate.

RESULTS

The main technical success rate was 99.4% (162/163). No patient required conversion to the femoral artery (TFA) access. All the complications were minor and occurred in 11 patients (6.75%). Subcutaneous ecchymosis occurred in 3 (1.84%) patients, arterial thrombosis in 2 patients (1.23%), and catheter displacement in 6 patients (3.68%). No serious complications occurred.

CONCLUSIONS

TBA pathway is feasible and safe for HAIC treatment of liver cancer patients. More research is needed in the future to confirm whether TBA is superior to other pathways.

摘要

背景

与经股动脉(TFA)进行肝动脉灌注化疗(HAIC)相比,经肱动脉(TBA)更为灵活,患者更容易接受。然而,TBA的可行性尚未得到研究。本研究旨在评估经TBA进行HAIC的可行性和安全性。

方法

我们回顾性分析了63例经TBA进行HAIC治疗的原发性肝癌患者的病历。在本研究中,通过左肱动脉途径共进行了163次HAIC手术,每位患者平均接受2.59次手术。1例患者接受了5次治疗,18例患者接受了4次治疗,15例患者接受了3次治疗,12例患者接受了2次治疗,17例患者接受了1次治疗。主要评估指标为技术成功率和并发症发生率。

结果

主要技术成功率为99.4%(162/163)。没有患者需要转为经股动脉(TFA)入路。所有并发症均为轻微并发症,11例患者(6.75%)发生并发症。3例患者(1.84%)出现皮下瘀斑,2例患者(1.23%)出现动脉血栓形成,6例患者(3.68%)出现导管移位。未发生严重并发症。

结论

TBA途径对肝癌患者进行HAIC治疗是可行且安全的。未来需要更多研究来证实TBA是否优于其他途径。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

1
Is brachial artery approach safe for hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy?肱动脉途径用于肝动脉灌注化疗是否安全?
J Gastrointest Oncol. 2024 Apr 30;15(2):805-806. doi: 10.21037/jgo-24-15. Epub 2024 Apr 28.
2
A description of the correction of data error and the direction of in-depth research.数据误差校正的描述及深入研究方向。
J Gastrointest Oncol. 2024 Apr 30;15(2):803-804. doi: 10.21037/jgo-24-89. Epub 2024 Apr 28.

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验