Suppr超能文献

仑伐替尼、托瑞帕利单抗联合肝动脉灌注化疗与单用仑伐替尼治疗晚期肝细胞癌的比较

Lenvatinib, toripalimab, plus hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy lenvatinib alone for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma.

作者信息

He Min-Ke, Liang Run-Bin, Zhao Yang, Xu Yu-Jie, Chen Huan-Wei, Zhou Yuan-Min, Lai Zhi-Cheng, Xu Li, Wei Wei, Zhang Yao-Jun, Chen Min-Shan, Guo Rong-Ping, Li Qi-Jiong, Shi Ming

机构信息

Department of Hepatobiliary Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China.

First People's Hospital of Foshan, Foshan, Guangdong, China.

出版信息

Ther Adv Med Oncol. 2021 Mar 25;13:17588359211002720. doi: 10.1177/17588359211002720. eCollection 2021.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Lenvatinib is the first-line treatment for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma, but prognosis is still unsatisfactory. Recently, hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC), and immune checkpoint inhibitors showed promising results for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. Considering different anti-malignancy mechanisms, combining these three treatments may improve outcomes. This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of lenvatinib, toripalimab, plus HAIC lenvatinib for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study including patients treated with lenvatinib [8 mg (⩽60 kg) or 12 mg (>60 kg) once daily] or lenvatinib, toripalimab plus HAIC [LeToHAIC group, lenvatinib 0-1 week prior to initial HAIC, 240 mg toripalimab 0-1 day prior to every HAIC cycle, and HAIC with FOLFOX regimen (oxaliplatin 85 mg/m, leucovorin 400 mg/m, 5-fluorouracil bolus 400 mg/m on day 1, and 5-fluorouracil infusion 2400 mg/m for 46 h, every 3 weeks)]. Progression-free survival, overall survival, objective response rate, and treatment-related adverse events were compared.

RESULTS

From February 2019 to August 2019, 157 patients were included in this study: 71 in the LeToHAIC group and 86 in the lenvatinib group. The LeToHAIC group showed longer progression-free survival (11.1 5.1 months,  < 0.001), longer overall survival (not reached 11 months,  < 0.001), and a higher objective response rate (RECIST: 59.2% 9.3%,  < 0.001; modified RECIST: 67.6% 16.3%,  < 0.001) than the lenvatinib group. In addition, 14.1% and 21.1% of patients in the LeToHAIC group achieved complete response of all lesions and complete response of the intrahepatic target lesions per modified RECIST criteria, respectively. Grade 3/4 treatment-related adverse events that were more frequent in the LeToHAIC group than in the lenvatinib group included neutropenia (8.5% 1.2%), thrombocytopenia (5.6% 0), and nausea (5.6% 0).

CONCLUSIONS

Lenvatinib, toripalimab, plus HAIC had acceptable toxic effects and might improve survival compared with lenvatinib alone in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma.

摘要

背景

仑伐替尼是晚期肝细胞癌的一线治疗药物,但预后仍不尽人意。最近,肝动脉灌注化疗(HAIC)和免疫检查点抑制剂在晚期肝细胞癌治疗中显示出了有前景的效果。考虑到不同的抗癌机制,联合这三种治疗方法可能会改善治疗效果。本研究旨在比较仑伐替尼、托瑞帕利单抗联合HAIC与单用仑伐替尼治疗晚期肝细胞癌的疗效和安全性。

方法

这是一项回顾性研究,纳入了接受仑伐替尼治疗的患者[8毫克(≤60千克)或12毫克(>60千克),每日一次],或接受仑伐替尼、托瑞帕利单抗联合HAIC治疗的患者[LeToHAIC组,在首次HAIC前0至1周使用仑伐替尼,在每个HAIC周期前0至1天使用240毫克托瑞帕利单抗,以及采用FOLFOX方案进行HAIC(奥沙利铂85毫克/平方米,亚叶酸钙400毫克/平方米,第1天静脉推注5-氟尿嘧啶400毫克/平方米,随后5-氟尿嘧啶持续输注2400毫克/平方米,持续46小时,每3周一次)]。比较无进展生存期、总生存期、客观缓解率和治疗相关不良事件。

结果

2019年2月至2019年8月,本研究共纳入157例患者:LeToHAIC组71例,仑伐替尼组86例。LeToHAIC组的无进展生存期更长(11.1±5.1个月,P<0.001),总生存期更长(未达到对比11个月,P<0.001),客观缓解率更高(RECIST标准:59.2%±9.3%,P<0.001;改良RECIST标准:67.6%±16.3%,P<0.001)。此外,根据改良RECIST标准,LeToHAIC组分别有14.1%和21.1%的患者实现了所有病灶的完全缓解和肝内靶病灶的完全缓解。LeToHAIC组比仑伐替尼组更频繁出现的3/4级治疗相关不良事件包括中性粒细胞减少(8.5%对比1.2%)、血小板减少(5.6%对比0)和恶心(5.6%对比0)。

结论

在晚期肝细胞癌中,与单用仑伐替尼相比,仑伐替尼、托瑞帕利单抗联合HAIC具有可接受的毒性作用,可能会提高生存率。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/97cb/8010824/da1248e07bca/10.1177_17588359211002720-fig1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验