同行评审主席报告：脊椎按摩疗法学院协会2023年教育会议及研究议程会议同行评审流程
Peer review chair report: Association of Chiropractic Colleges Educational Conference and Research Agenda Conference 2023 peer review process.
作者信息
Johnson Claire
出版信息
J Chiropr Educ. 2023 Oct 1;37(2):182-188. doi: 10.7899/JCE-23-20.
OBJECTIVE
The purpose of this report is to provide a summary of the methods used and feedback from reviewers about the peer review process for the 2023 Association of Chiropractic Colleges Educational Conference and Research Agenda Conference (ACC-RAC).
METHODS
After the peer review process was complete, the 2023 ACC-RAC peer review committee members were invited to provide feedback through an anonymous electronic form. The survey included a Likert scale to rate items about the peer review process and an option for open-ended comments.
RESULTS
Of the 166 peer reviewers, 77 (46%) completed the survey. The reviewers represented 9 countries, with the greatest number from North America. The majority (95%) of respondents rated the process of peer review in topic groups as good to excellent, and the majority (92%) of respondents rated the overall 2023 peer review process as good to excellent. The critical comments that were submitted are addressed in this report.
CONCLUSION
Overall, peer reviewer satisfaction with the process used for the 2023 ACC-RAC was high. We will include information from this report as part of the continuous quality improvement of peer review process, an important part of improving chiropractic education, research, and scholarly activities.
目的
本报告旨在总结2023年脊椎按摩疗法学院协会教育会议和研究议程会议（ACC-RAC）所使用的同行评审方法以及评审人员的反馈。
方法
同行评审过程结束后，邀请2023年ACC-RAC同行评审委员会成员通过匿名电子表格提供反馈。该调查包括一个李克特量表，用于对同行评审过程的各项内容进行评分，以及一个开放式评论选项。
结果
166名同行评审人员中，77人（46%）完成了调查。评审人员来自9个国家，其中北美人数最多。大多数（95%）受访者对主题组的同行评审过程评价为良好至优秀，大多数（92%）受访者对2023年整体同行评审过程评价为良好至优秀。本报告对提交的批评意见进行了回应。
结论
总体而言，同行评审人员对2023年ACC-RAC所采用的评审过程满意度较高。我们将把本报告中的信息作为同行评审过程持续质量改进的一部分，这是改善脊椎按摩疗法教育、研究和学术活动的重要组成部分。
Zotero 插件