Suppr超能文献

内镜相关的患者安全事件:国家报告与学习系统(NRLS)中非程序性严重伤害事件的人为因素分析。

Patient safety incidents in endoscopy: a human factors analysis of nonprocedural significant harm incidents from the National Reporting and Learning System (NRLS).

机构信息

Joint Advisory Group on Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, Royal College of Physicians, London, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.

Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.

出版信息

Endoscopy. 2024 Feb;56(2):89-99. doi: 10.1055/a-2177-4130. Epub 2023 Sep 18.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Despite advances in understanding and reducing the risk of endoscopic procedures, there is little consideration of the safety of the wider endoscopy service. Patient safety incidents (PSIs) still occur. We sought to identify nonprocedural PSIs (nPSIs) and their causative factors from a human factors perspective and generate ideas for safety improvement.

METHODS

Endoscopy-specific PSI reports were extracted from the National Reporting and Learning System (NRLS). A retrospective, cross-sectional human factors analysis of data was performed. Two independent researchers coded data using a hybrid thematic analysis approach. The Human Factors Analysis and Classification System (HFACS) was used to code contributory factors. Analysis informed creation of driver diagrams and key recommendations for safety improvement in endoscopy.

RESULTS

From 2017 to 2019, 1181 endoscopy-specific PSIs of significant harm were reported across England and Wales, with 539 (45.6%) being nPSIs. Five categories accounted for over 80% of all incidents, with "follow-up and surveillance" being the largest (23.4% of all nPSIs). From the free-text incident reports, 487 human factors codes were identified. Decision-based errors were the most common act prior to PSI occurrence. Other frequent preconditions to incidents were focused on environmental factors, particularly overwhelmed resources, patient factors, and ineffective team communication. Lack of staffing, standard operating procedures, effective systems, and clinical pathways were also contributory. Seven key recommendations for improving safety have been made in response to our findings.

CONCLUSIONS

This was the first national-level human factors analysis of endoscopy-specific PSIs. This work will inform safety improvement strategies and should empower individual services to review their approach to safety.

摘要

背景

尽管内镜操作的安全性已得到深入了解并得到了降低风险的改善,但对于更广泛的内镜服务安全性考虑甚少。仍会发生患者安全事件(PSIs)。我们从人为因素的角度出发,旨在识别非程序 PSIs(nPSIs)及其成因,并提出安全改进的想法。

方法

从国家报告和学习系统(NRLS)中提取特定于内镜的 PSI 报告。对数据进行了回顾性、横断面的人为因素分析。两位独立的研究人员使用混合主题分析方法对数据进行编码。使用人为因素分析和分类系统(HFACS)对促成因素进行编码。分析结果为内镜安全改进提供了驾驶员图和关键建议。

结果

2017 年至 2019 年,在英格兰和威尔士共报告了 1181 例内镜特定的严重伤害 PSIs,其中 539 例(45.6%)为 nPSIs。五个类别占所有事件的 80%以上,其中“随访和监测”最大(占所有 nPSIs 的 23.4%)。从自由文本事故报告中确定了 487 个人为因素代码。决策错误是 PSI 发生前最常见的行为。其他经常出现的事件前条件是针对环境因素,特别是资源紧张、患者因素和无效的团队沟通。缺乏人员配置、标准操作程序、有效的系统和临床路径也是促成因素。针对我们的发现,提出了 7 项改进安全的关键建议。

结论

这是首次对内镜特定 PSIs 进行的国家级人为因素分析。这项工作将为安全改进策略提供信息,并应使各个服务部门能够审查其安全方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验