• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

内镜相关的患者安全事件:国家报告与学习系统(NRLS)中非程序性严重伤害事件的人为因素分析。

Patient safety incidents in endoscopy: a human factors analysis of nonprocedural significant harm incidents from the National Reporting and Learning System (NRLS).

机构信息

Joint Advisory Group on Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, Royal College of Physicians, London, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.

Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.

出版信息

Endoscopy. 2024 Feb;56(2):89-99. doi: 10.1055/a-2177-4130. Epub 2023 Sep 18.

DOI:10.1055/a-2177-4130
PMID:37722604
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Despite advances in understanding and reducing the risk of endoscopic procedures, there is little consideration of the safety of the wider endoscopy service. Patient safety incidents (PSIs) still occur. We sought to identify nonprocedural PSIs (nPSIs) and their causative factors from a human factors perspective and generate ideas for safety improvement.

METHODS

Endoscopy-specific PSI reports were extracted from the National Reporting and Learning System (NRLS). A retrospective, cross-sectional human factors analysis of data was performed. Two independent researchers coded data using a hybrid thematic analysis approach. The Human Factors Analysis and Classification System (HFACS) was used to code contributory factors. Analysis informed creation of driver diagrams and key recommendations for safety improvement in endoscopy.

RESULTS

From 2017 to 2019, 1181 endoscopy-specific PSIs of significant harm were reported across England and Wales, with 539 (45.6%) being nPSIs. Five categories accounted for over 80% of all incidents, with "follow-up and surveillance" being the largest (23.4% of all nPSIs). From the free-text incident reports, 487 human factors codes were identified. Decision-based errors were the most common act prior to PSI occurrence. Other frequent preconditions to incidents were focused on environmental factors, particularly overwhelmed resources, patient factors, and ineffective team communication. Lack of staffing, standard operating procedures, effective systems, and clinical pathways were also contributory. Seven key recommendations for improving safety have been made in response to our findings.

CONCLUSIONS

This was the first national-level human factors analysis of endoscopy-specific PSIs. This work will inform safety improvement strategies and should empower individual services to review their approach to safety.

摘要

背景

尽管内镜操作的安全性已得到深入了解并得到了降低风险的改善,但对于更广泛的内镜服务安全性考虑甚少。仍会发生患者安全事件(PSIs)。我们从人为因素的角度出发,旨在识别非程序 PSIs(nPSIs)及其成因,并提出安全改进的想法。

方法

从国家报告和学习系统(NRLS)中提取特定于内镜的 PSI 报告。对数据进行了回顾性、横断面的人为因素分析。两位独立的研究人员使用混合主题分析方法对数据进行编码。使用人为因素分析和分类系统(HFACS)对促成因素进行编码。分析结果为内镜安全改进提供了驾驶员图和关键建议。

结果

2017 年至 2019 年,在英格兰和威尔士共报告了 1181 例内镜特定的严重伤害 PSIs,其中 539 例(45.6%)为 nPSIs。五个类别占所有事件的 80%以上,其中“随访和监测”最大(占所有 nPSIs 的 23.4%)。从自由文本事故报告中确定了 487 个人为因素代码。决策错误是 PSI 发生前最常见的行为。其他经常出现的事件前条件是针对环境因素,特别是资源紧张、患者因素和无效的团队沟通。缺乏人员配置、标准操作程序、有效的系统和临床路径也是促成因素。针对我们的发现,提出了 7 项改进安全的关键建议。

结论

这是首次对内镜特定 PSIs 进行的国家级人为因素分析。这项工作将为安全改进策略提供信息,并应使各个服务部门能够审查其安全方法。

相似文献

1
Patient safety incidents in endoscopy: a human factors analysis of nonprocedural significant harm incidents from the National Reporting and Learning System (NRLS).内镜相关的患者安全事件:国家报告与学习系统(NRLS)中非程序性严重伤害事件的人为因素分析。
Endoscopy. 2024 Feb;56(2):89-99. doi: 10.1055/a-2177-4130. Epub 2023 Sep 18.
2
Can Patient Safety Incident Reports Be Used to Compare Hospital Safety? Results from a Quantitative Analysis of the English National Reporting and Learning System Data.患者安全事件报告能否用于比较医院安全性?对英国国家报告与学习系统数据的定量分析结果
PLoS One. 2015 Dec 9;10(12):e0144107. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0144107. eCollection 2015.
3
Analysis of the nature and contributory factors of medication safety incidents following hospital discharge using National Reporting and Learning System (NRLS) data from England and Wales: a multi-method study.利用来自英格兰和威尔士的国家报告与学习系统(NRLS)数据对出院后用药安全事件的性质和促成因素进行分析:一项多方法研究。
Ther Adv Drug Saf. 2023 Mar 16;14:20420986231154365. doi: 10.1177/20420986231154365. eCollection 2023.
4
Characterising the nature of clinical incidents reported across a tertiary health service: a retrospective audit.描述一家三级保健服务机构报告的临床事件的性质:回顾性审计。
Aust Health Rev. 2021 Aug;45(4):447-454. doi: 10.1071/AH20271.
5
6
Falls in English and Welsh hospitals: a national observational study based on retrospective analysis of 12 months of patient safety incident reports.英格兰和威尔士医院的跌倒事件:一项基于对12个月患者安全事件报告进行回顾性分析的全国性观察研究。
Qual Saf Health Care. 2008 Dec;17(6):424-30. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2007.024695.
7
The effects and preventability of 2627 patient safety incidents related to health information technology failures: a retrospective analysis of 10 years of incident reporting in England and Wales.与医疗信息技术故障相关的 2627 起患者安全事件的影响和可预防措施:对英格兰和威尔士 10 年来事件报告的回顾性分析。
Lancet Digit Health. 2019 Jul;1(3):e127-e135. doi: 10.1016/S2589-7500(19)30057-3. Epub 2019 Jun 27.
8
Sources of unsafe primary care for older adults: a mixed-methods analysis of patient safety incident reports.老年人不安全初级保健的来源:对患者安全事件报告的混合方法分析。
Age Ageing. 2017 Sep 1;46(5):833-839. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afx044.
9
A mixed-methods analysis of patient safety incidents involving opioid substitution treatment with methadone or buprenorphine in community-based care in England and Wales.英格兰和威尔士基于社区的美沙酮或丁丙诺啡类药物替代治疗中涉及阿片类药物使用障碍患者安全事件的混合方法分析。
Addiction. 2020 Nov;115(11):2066-2076. doi: 10.1111/add.15039. Epub 2020 Apr 27.
10
Learning from patient safety incidents involving acutely sick adults in hospital assessment units in England and Wales: a mixed methods analysis for quality improvement.从英格兰和威尔士医院评估病房中急性病成年人的患者安全事件中学习:用于质量改进的混合方法分析。
J R Soc Med. 2021 Dec;114(12):563-574. doi: 10.1177/01410768211032589. Epub 2021 Aug 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Patient safety in eye care: a multi-method analysis of reported incidents involving implementation of care and clinical assessment in England and Wales.眼科护理中的患者安全:对英格兰和威尔士报告的涉及护理实施和临床评估的事件进行的多方法分析。
Eye (Lond). 2025 Jun;39(8):1486-1494. doi: 10.1038/s41433-025-03669-6. Epub 2025 Feb 13.