Acta Chir Plast. 2023 Summer;65(2):74-78. doi: 10.48095/ccachp202374.
This paper describes the evaluation options of Dupuytren's contracture by subjective and objective methods. There are various classification schemes named after their authors, including graphical representation for objective evaluation of the disease. Subjective assessment was performed in the form of a questionnaire for patients. The QuickDASH with a small specification for Dupuytren's contracture is the most commonly used questionnaire. The Southampton Dupuytren's Scoring Scheme questionnaire appears to be a higher specification. The classifications allow evaluation of treatment success to determine prognosis of the disease. The analysis of articles is based on PubMed search from the years 1967-2022, with 28 relevant articles were retrieved. Based on this analysis, the Tubiana classification appears to be the most appropriate one for patients with Dupuytren's contracture. Of patient questionnaires, the Southampton Dupuytren's Scoring Scheme meets these parameters.
本文描述了通过主观和客观方法评估杜普伊特伦挛缩的方法。有各种以作者命名的分类方案，包括用于疾病客观评估的图形表示。主观评估采用患者问卷的形式进行。QuickDASH 是最常用的针对杜普伊特伦挛缩的小规格问卷。南安普顿杜普伊特伦评分方案问卷似乎具有更高的规格。这些分类方法可用于评估治疗效果，以确定疾病的预后。文章分析基于 1967 年至 2022 年在 PubMed 上的搜索，共检索到 28 篇相关文章。基于此分析，Tubiana 分类似乎最适合杜普伊特伦挛缩患者。在患者问卷中，南安普顿杜普伊特伦评分方案符合这些参数。
