The Brady Urological Institute and Department of Urology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.
The Brady Urological Institute and Department of Urology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Department of Radiology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.
Urol Oncol. 2023 Nov;41(11):455.e1-455.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2023.08.011. Epub 2023 Sep 16.
It is not known whether baseline prostate health index (PHI) at the initiation of active surveillance (AS) or repeated PHI testing during AS is of clinical value after confirmatory biopsy in AS men followed with multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI).
We identified 382 AS patients with no greater than Grade Group 1 (GG1) prostate cancer on diagnostic and confirmatory biopsy, at least one mpMRI and PHI test, of which 241 had at least 2 PHI tests. Grade reclassification (GR) was defined as ≥GG2 on surveillance biopsy. PHI risk categories 1 to 4 were as defined by the manufacturer. Associations between baseline PHI risk category or baseline PSA density (PSAD), change in PHI risk categories over time or PSAD changes over time and GR were evaluated with multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression models adjusted for age, Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System score and number of positive cores.
Men with baseline PHI scores in the highest risk categories had lower rates of GR-free survival (log-rank P < 0.001), as did those who increased in PHI risk category or remained in a high PHI risk category during surveillance (log-rank P = 0.032). On multivariable regression, baseline PHI risk category was a predictor of GR (risk category 4 [vs. 1] hazard ratio [HR] 2.74, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.32-5.66, P = 0.002, model C-index 0.764, Akaike Information Criterion [AIC] 797), as were PHI risk category changes over time (risk category 4 [vs. 1] HR 4.20, 95% CI 1.76-10.05, P = 0.002, C-index 0.759, AIC 489). Separate models with baseline PSAD and PSAD changes over time yielded C-indices of 0.709 (AIC 809) and 0.733 (AIC 495) respectively.
Baseline PHI risk category and PHI changes over time were both independent predictors of GR after confirmatory biopsy, but the added benefit over PSAD seemed modest. However, baseline PHI and PHI risk category changes provided clinically useful risk stratification for time to GR, so further evaluation of PHI's ability to help reduce the frequency of mpMRI and/or surveillance biopsies with more PHI data points over time may be warranted.
在接受多参数磁共振成像(mpMRI)检查的接受主动监测(AS)的男性中,在确认活检后,基线前列腺健康指数(PHI)在 AS 开始时或在 AS 期间进行重复 PHI 检测是否具有临床价值尚不清楚。
我们确定了 382 名前列腺癌诊断和确认活检中无大于 GG1 级(GG1)的 AS 患者,至少进行了一次 mpMRI 和 PHI 检查,其中 241 名患者至少进行了 2 次 PHI 检查。分级重新分类(GR)定义为监测活检中的≥GG2。根据制造商的定义,将 PHI 风险类别 1 至 4。使用多变量 Cox 比例风险回归模型评估基线 PHI 风险类别或基线 PSA 密度(PSAD)、随时间变化的 PHI 风险类别变化或 PSAD 变化与 GR 之间的关系,并调整年龄、前列腺影像学报告和数据系统评分以及阳性核心数。
基线 PHI 评分处于最高风险类别的男性无 GR 无复发生存率较低(对数秩 P < 0.001),而那些 PHI 风险类别增加或在监测期间仍处于高 PHI 风险类别的男性(对数秩 P = 0.032)。多变量回归分析显示,基线 PHI 风险类别是 GR 的预测因子(风险类别 4 [与 1 相比],危险比 [HR] 2.74,95%置信区间 [CI] 1.32-5.66,P = 0.002,模型 C 指数 0.764,Akaike 信息准则 [AIC] 797),随时间变化的 PHI 风险类别变化也是如此(风险类别 4 [与 1 相比] HR 4.20,95%CI 1.76-10.05,P = 0.002,C 指数 0.759,AIC 489)。分别使用基线 PSAD 和随时间变化的 PSAD 建立的模型的 C 指数分别为 0.709(AIC 809)和 0.733(AIC 495)。
基线 PHI 风险类别和随时间变化的 PHI 均是确认活检后 GR 的独立预测因子,但与 PSAD 相比,其附加益处似乎微不足道。然而,基线 PHI 和 PHI 风险类别变化为 GR 时间提供了临床有用的风险分层,因此可能需要进一步评估 PHI 随着时间的推移通过更多 PHI 数据点帮助减少 mpMRI 和/或监测活检的频率的能力。