Fogt Jennifer Swingle, Menner Abigail, Patton Kim
The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, United States.
J Contact Lens Res Sci. 2022 Mar 14;6(1):e18-e24. doi: 10.22374/jclrs.v6i1.53. Epub 2023 Jul 31.
Soft contact lens wearers are often prescribed the same lens material and modality for multiple years if patients express satisfaction and no significant problems with lens fit or ocular health are noted upon evaluation. Despite their satisfaction, it is possible that other lenses exist that could provide additional health or convenience benefits and still provide satisfied lens wear experience.
In this study, wearers of a specific monthly replacement lens brand (comfilcon A) were recruited for an open-label study. The habitual contact lens prescription was optimized for 2 weeks of wear and participants confirmed that they were satisfied with their habitual lenses before being refit with daily disposable lenses (verofilcon A). Participants responded to visual analog scale (VAS) survey about their initial impressions of the lenses. After 2 weeks of lens wear, participants completed a final study visit and completed surveys about lens wear experiences with the daily disposable study lenses.
Fifteen male and 15 female participants completed the study. Median (IQR) binocular LogMAR visual acuity was -0.20(0.12), which is equivalent to 10/12.5 Snellen acuity. Initial impression surveys revealed median (interquartile range) of 92.5(22.3) for quality of vision; 95.0(19.3) for comfort; and 91.5(19.3) for satisfaction. At the final visit, median scores for EOD quality of vision was 86.5(24.0); EOD comfort was 84.5(30.3), and EOD dryness 25.5(47.0). Median overall VAS scores were 92.5(16.0) for vision; 88.0(18.3) for comfort, and 17.5(25.8) for dryness. Median satisfaction with the study lenses was scored 9(2.8) on a 1-10 scale.
In this study, satisfied wearers of comfilcon A reusable lens were refit with Verofilcon A daily disposable lenses and showed high satisfaction scores with the new lenses, showing that refitting these patients can allow patients to have lenses with more frequent replacement and maintain satisfaction with daily lens wear.
如果患者表示满意且在评估时未发现镜片适配或眼部健康方面存在重大问题,软性隐形眼镜佩戴者通常会多年使用相同的镜片材料和类型。尽管他们感到满意,但可能存在其他镜片,能够带来更多的健康益处或便利性,同时仍能提供令人满意的佩戴体验。
在本研究中,招募了特定月抛型镜片品牌(comfilcon A)的佩戴者参与一项开放标签研究。将习惯性隐形眼镜处方优化以适应2周的佩戴时间,并且在为参与者重新佩戴日抛型镜片(verofilcon A)之前,确认他们对习惯性使用的镜片感到满意。参与者通过视觉模拟量表(VAS)调查对镜片的初始印象进行反馈。在佩戴镜片2周后,参与者完成了最后的研究访视,并完成了关于使用日抛型研究镜片的佩戴体验的调查。
15名男性和15名女性参与者完成了该研究。双眼LogMAR视力中位数(四分位间距)为-0.20(0.12),相当于Snellen视力10/12.5。初始印象调查显示,视觉质量中位数(四分位间距)为92.5(22.3);舒适度为95.0(19.3);满意度为91.5(19.3)。在最后一次访视时,日抛型镜片的视觉质量中位数得分是86.5(24.0);日抛型镜片的舒适度为84.5(30.3),日抛型镜片的干眼程度为25.5(47.0)。视觉方面的总体VAS中位数得分是92.5(16.0);舒适度为88.0(18.3),干眼程度为17.5(25.8)。在1-10的评分量表上,对研究镜片的满意度中位数得分为9(2.8)。
在本研究中,对使用comfilcon A可重复使用镜片感到满意的佩戴者重新佩戴了Verofilcon A日抛型镜片,并且对新镜片表现出较高的满意度评分,这表明为这些患者重新配镜可以让患者使用更换更频繁的镜片,并保持对日常镜片佩戴的满意度。