• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Using audiometric data base analysis.

作者信息

Royster J D, Royster L H

出版信息

J Occup Med. 1986 Oct;28(10):1055-68. doi: 10.1097/00043764-198610000-00029.

DOI:10.1097/00043764-198610000-00029
PMID:3772540
Abstract

Audiometric data base analysis (ADBA) offers the most direct means of judging the effectiveness of a hearing conservation program (HCP) in preventing occupational hearing loss. However, numerous factors need to be accounted for if the findings are to be meaningful. This paper discusses several parameters known to influence the interpretation of group data statistics in assessing HCP effectiveness. Testing factors that affect the stability of the data base include audiometric techniques, calibration procedures, testing environment, and the motivation and prior experience of the subject. Pertinent population parameters include age, sex, race, current and prior noise exposures, learning effects, and the types of hearing protectors in use. Two case histories are presented to illustrate the application of ADBA techniques. Specific analysis procedures reviewed include comparisons of mean thresholds for selected industrial and nonindustrial populations, rates of change in mean hearing levels over a period of time, baseline and sequential test-retest comparisons, and different threshold shift criteria. The preliminary results of ADBA research being done by the American National Standards Institute (ANSI) S12.12 Working Group are summarized, including desirable criterion ranges for several statistics established by applying them to control data sets.

摘要

相似文献

1
Using audiometric data base analysis.
J Occup Med. 1986 Oct;28(10):1055-68. doi: 10.1097/00043764-198610000-00029.
2
Hearing conservation programs (HCPs): the effectiveness of one company's HCP in a 12-hr work shift environment.
Am Ind Hyg Assoc J. 1990 Aug;51(8):437-46. doi: 10.1080/15298669091369907.
3
The otolaryngologist and hearing protectors.耳鼻喉科医生与听力保护器
Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 1984 Nov;17(4):633-40.
4
The performance of circumaural hearing protectors by dosimetry.
J Occup Med. 1983 Sep;25(9):679-82. doi: 10.1097/00043764-198309000-00016.
5
Group mean hearing threshold changes in a noise-exposed industrial population using personal hearing protectors.使用个人听力保护器的噪声暴露工业人群的组平均听力阈值变化
Am Ind Hyg Assoc J. 1987 Jan;48(1):23-7. doi: 10.1080/15298668791384300.
6
The contribution of focus groups in the evaluation of hearing conservation program (HCP) effectiveness.焦点小组在听力保护计划(HCP)效果评估中的作用。
J Safety Res. 2004;35(1):91-106. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2003.12.001.
7
Noise-induced hearing loss and hearing protective devices.噪声性听力损失与听力保护装置
Can J Public Health. 1986 May-Jun;77 Suppl 1:104-7.
8
[Attenuation efficiency of hearing protectors for workers exposed to noise].[针对暴露于噪声环境中的工人的听力保护器衰减效率]
Sangyo Igaku. 1984 Mar;26(2):178-9.
9
The effectiveness of hearing protectors in practice.听力保护器在实际应用中的效果。
J Otolaryngol. 1979 Aug;8(4):354-9.
10
New draft ANSI standard enhances efforts in hearing conservation.美国国家标准学会(ANSI)新草案加强了听力保护工作。
Occup Health Saf. 1991 Oct;60(10):86, 89-90.

引用本文的文献

1
Estimating miners at risk for occupational noise-induced hearing loss: A review of data from a South African platinum mine.评估有职业性噪声性听力损失风险的矿工:对南非一座铂矿数据的综述
S Afr J Commun Disord. 2020 Mar 26;67(2):e1-e8. doi: 10.4102/sajcd.v67i2.677.
2
Longitudinal screening of hearing threshold in navy divers: is diving really a hazard?海军潜水员听力阈值的纵向筛查:潜水真的有危害吗?
Diving Hyperb Med. 2019 Dec 20;49(4):283-290. doi: 10.28920/dhm49.4.283-290.
3
Assessing Hearing Conservation Program Effectiveness: Results of a Multisite Assessment.
评估听力保护计划的有效性:多地点评估的结果。
J Occup Environ Med. 2018 Jan;60(1):29-35. doi: 10.1097/JOM.0000000000001125.
4
Hearing protector fit testing with off-shore oil-rig inspectors in Louisiana and Texas.在路易斯安那州和得克萨斯州对近海石油钻井平台检查员进行听力保护器适配测试。
Int J Audiol. 2016 Nov;55(11):688-98. doi: 10.1080/14992027.2016.1204470. Epub 2016 Jul 14.
5
Longitudinal changes in hearing threshold levels of noise-exposed construction workers.噪声暴露建筑工人听力阈值水平的纵向变化。
Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2015 Jan;88(1):45-60. doi: 10.1007/s00420-014-0932-y. Epub 2014 Mar 9.
6
Methods for evaluating temporal trends in noise exposure.评估噪声暴露时间趋势的方法。
Int J Audiol. 2014 Mar;53 Suppl 2(0 2):S76-83. doi: 10.3109/14992027.2013.857438.
7
Evaluation of audiometric threshold shift criteria for ototoxicity monitoring.用于耳毒性监测的听阈移位标准评估。
J Am Acad Audiol. 2010 May;21(5):301-14; quiz 357. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.21.5.3.
8
Noise exposure and hearing loss among sand and gravel miners.砂石矿工的噪声暴露与听力损失
J Occup Environ Hyg. 2004 Aug;1(8):532-41. doi: 10.1080/15459620490476503.