• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

序列分块中的重复代价。

Repetition costs in sequence chunking.

机构信息

Institute of Psychology, RWTH Aachen University, Jägerstraße 17-19, 52066, Aachen, Germany.

出版信息

Psychon Bull Rev. 2024 Apr;31(2):802-818. doi: 10.3758/s13423-023-02338-7. Epub 2023 Sep 19.

DOI:10.3758/s13423-023-02338-7
PMID:37726598
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11061030/
Abstract

We examined how flexibly we plan sequences of actions when we switch between multiple action sequences. Mastering a sequential skill is assumed to involve integrating successive actions into groups known as chunks that can be efficiently planned and smoothly executed. Chunking is suggested by gains in planning efficiency for long compared to short action sequences following practice and learning associations between actions and perceptual outcomes. Less is understood about how efficiently we plan sequential chunks when we switch between multiple action sequences. Do we plan learned chunks less efficiently when we switch to a different action sequence? We examined this question by comparing the initiation and execution latencies of long versus short action sequences, performed from memory, when sequences switched or repeated across trials. Additionally, each action within the sequences generated predictable perceptual outcomes that were either spatially compatible or spatially incompatible with the action sequences. Results suggested repetition costs (instead of benefits) when performing long sequences. Repetition, as opposed to switching, prolonged initiation and increased the error rate of long compared to short sequences. We attribute these results to the flexible coordination of chunk planning and execution. Repetition may prolong advanced planning of long sequences in order to resolve conflict between multiple chunks, and switching may allow the planning of later chunks to be postponed until execution. We propose that the chunking of action sequences can both facilitate and interfere with action-switching performance.

摘要

我们研究了当我们在多个动作序列之间切换时,我们如何灵活地规划动作序列。掌握顺序技能被认为涉及将连续的动作整合到称为块的组中,这些块可以有效地规划和顺利执行。在练习和学习动作与感知结果之间的关联之后,与短动作序列相比,长动作序列在计划效率上的提高表明了分块的作用。当我们在多个动作序列之间切换时,我们如何有效地规划顺序块,这方面的了解较少。当我们切换到不同的动作序列时,我们是否会更有效地规划已学习的块?我们通过比较在试验中切换或重复的记忆中执行的长动作序列与短动作序列的启动和执行潜伏期来检验这个问题。此外,序列中的每个动作都会产生可预测的感知结果,这些结果与动作序列在空间上兼容或不兼容。结果表明,当执行长序列时,重复会产生成本(而不是收益)。与切换相比,重复会延长启动时间,并增加长序列相对于短序列的错误率。我们将这些结果归因于块规划和执行的灵活协调。重复可能会延长长序列的高级计划,以解决多个块之间的冲突,而切换可能会允许推迟计划后续块,直到执行。我们提出,动作序列的分块既可以促进也可以干扰动作切换性能。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6d72/11061030/42242b5dec29/13423_2023_2338_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6d72/11061030/c295dfd13618/13423_2023_2338_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6d72/11061030/cd8592523a72/13423_2023_2338_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6d72/11061030/bd3a776929ad/13423_2023_2338_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6d72/11061030/42242b5dec29/13423_2023_2338_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6d72/11061030/c295dfd13618/13423_2023_2338_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6d72/11061030/cd8592523a72/13423_2023_2338_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6d72/11061030/bd3a776929ad/13423_2023_2338_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6d72/11061030/42242b5dec29/13423_2023_2338_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Repetition costs in sequence chunking.序列分块中的重复代价。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2024 Apr;31(2):802-818. doi: 10.3758/s13423-023-02338-7. Epub 2023 Sep 19.
2
Dissociable roles of preSMA in motor sequence chunking and hand switching-a TMS study.前辅助运动区在运动序列组块和手部切换中的不同作用——一项经颅磁刺激研究
J Neurophysiol. 2016 Dec 1;116(6):2637-2646. doi: 10.1152/jn.00565.2016. Epub 2016 Sep 21.
3
Motor learning and chunking in dyslexia.阅读障碍中的运动学习与组块化
J Mot Behav. 2009 Jul;41(4):331-7. doi: 10.3200/JMBR.41.4.331-338.
4
repetition facilitates online planning of sequential movements.重复有助于在线规划连续运动。
J Neurophysiol. 2020 May 1;123(5):1727-1738. doi: 10.1152/jn.00054.2020. Epub 2020 Mar 25.
5
Sequence learning is driven by improvements in motor planning.序列学习是由运动规划的改进驱动的。
J Neurophysiol. 2019 Jun 1;121(6):2088-2100. doi: 10.1152/jn.00041.2019. Epub 2019 Apr 10.
6
Chunking away task-switch costs: a test of the chunk-point hypothesis.消除任务切换成本:组块点假说的一项检验
Psychon Bull Rev. 2015 Jun;22(3):884-9. doi: 10.3758/s13423-014-0721-3.
7
Grouping in working memory guides chunk formation in long-term memory: Evidence from the Hebb effect.工作记忆中的分组引导长时记忆中的组块形成:来自赫布效应的证据。
Cognition. 2024 Jul;248:105795. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2024.105795. Epub 2024 Apr 25.
8
The role of action effects in motor sequence planning and execution: exploring the influence of temporal and spatial effect anticipation.动作效果在运动序列规划和执行中的作用:探索时间和空间效果预期的影响。
Psychol Res. 2022 Jun;86(4):1078-1096. doi: 10.1007/s00426-021-01525-2. Epub 2021 Jun 29.
9
Classic motor chunking theory fails to account for behavioural diversity and speed in a complex naturalistic task.经典的运动分块理论无法解释复杂自然任务中的行为多样性和速度。
PLoS One. 2019 Jun 13;14(6):e0218251. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0218251. eCollection 2019.
10
Learning a keying sequence you never executed: evidence for independent associative and motor chunk learning.学习一个你从未执行过的按键序列:独立联想和运动组块学习的证据
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2014 Sep;151:24-31. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2014.05.017. Epub 2014 Jun 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Opportune moments for task interruptions: examining the cognitive mechanisms underlying interruption-timing effects.任务中断的适当时机:探究中断时机效应背后的认知机制。
Front Psychol. 2025 Jan 15;15:1465323. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1465323. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
Partial repetition costs index a mixture of binding and signaling.部分重复成本指数混合了结合和信号传导。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2023 Feb;85(2):505-524. doi: 10.3758/s13414-022-02539-7. Epub 2022 Jul 21.
2
Response-repetition costs reflect changes to the representation of an action.反应重复成本反映了动作表示的变化。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2022 Dec;29(6):2146-2154. doi: 10.3758/s13423-022-02115-y. Epub 2022 May 26.
3
Inhibition-of-return-like effects in working memory? A preregistered replication study of Johnson . (2013).
工作记忆中的类似返回抑制效应?对约翰逊(2013年)的一项预先注册的重复研究。
R Soc Open Sci. 2021 Jul 7;8(7):210254. doi: 10.1098/rsos.210254. eCollection 2021 Jul.
4
The role of action effects in motor sequence planning and execution: exploring the influence of temporal and spatial effect anticipation.动作效果在运动序列规划和执行中的作用:探索时间和空间效果预期的影响。
Psychol Res. 2022 Jun;86(4):1078-1096. doi: 10.1007/s00426-021-01525-2. Epub 2021 Jun 29.
5
Effect-based action control with body-related effects: Implications for empirical approaches to ideomotor action control.基于身体相关效应的效果作用行动控制:对意念运动行动控制的实证方法的启示。
Psychol Rev. 2019 Jan;126(1):153-161. doi: 10.1037/rev0000140.
6
Priming of complex action via movement contingent sensory effects.通过运动伴随感觉效应启动复杂动作。
Hum Mov Sci. 2018 Oct;61:135-143. doi: 10.1016/j.humov.2018.08.001. Epub 2018 Aug 6.
7
Cognitive structure, flexibility, and plasticity in human multitasking-An integrative review of dual-task and task-switching research.人类多重任务中的认知结构、灵活性和可塑性——双任务和任务转换研究的综合综述。
Psychol Bull. 2018 Jun;144(6):557-583. doi: 10.1037/bul0000144. Epub 2018 Mar 8.
8
Visuomotor and motorvisual priming with different types of set-level congruency: evidence in support of ideomotor theory, and the planning and control model (PCM).不同类型集合水平一致性下的视动和动视启动:支持观念运动理论以及计划与控制模型(PCM)的证据
Psychol Res. 2018 Nov;82(6):1073-1090. doi: 10.1007/s00426-017-0885-3. Epub 2017 Jul 29.
9
Chunking as the result of an efficiency computation trade-off.作为效率计算权衡的结果的分块。
Nat Commun. 2016 Jul 11;7:12176. doi: 10.1038/ncomms12176.
10
Inhibition in motor imagery: a novel action mode switching paradigm.运动想象中的抑制:一种新型的动作模式转换范式。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2017 Apr;24(2):459-466. doi: 10.3758/s13423-016-1095-5.