• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

了解中国卫生系统中的财务风险保护:利用多项国家家庭调查数据进行的描述性分析。

Understanding financial risk protection in China's health system: a descriptive analysis using data from multiple national household surveys.

机构信息

School of Public Health, Peking University Health Science Center, Beijing, China.

出版信息

BMC Public Health. 2023 Sep 19;23(1):1820. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-16679-4.

DOI:10.1186/s12889-023-16679-4
PMID:37726730
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10508013/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Providing financial risk protection is one of the fundamental goals of health systems. Catastrophic health expenditure (CHE) and medical impoverishment (MI) are two common indicators in evaluating financial risk protection in health. As China continues its health system reform to provide accessible and affordable health care, it is important to have a clear understanding of China's progress in financial risk protection. However, past research showed discrepancies in the incidence of CHE and MI. In this article, using data from four national household surveys, we analyzed levels and characteristics of CHE and MI in China under different definitions.

METHODS

We used multiple conventional thresholds for CHE and MI to comprehensively describe the levels of financial risk protection in China. We used data from four national household surveys to measure the incidence of CHE and MI, and their inequalities by urban/rural status and by income quartiles. The Probit regression model was used to explore influencing factors of CHE and MI.

RESULTS

We found that the incidences of CHE and MI were largely consistent across four national household surveys, despite different sampling methods and questionnaire designs. At the 40% nonfood expenditure threshold, the incidence of CHE in China was 14.95%-17.73% across four surveys during the period of 2016-2017. Meanwhile, at the 1.9 US dollars poverty line, the incidence of MI was 2.01%-5.63%. Moreover, rural residents, lower-income subgroups, and smaller households were faced with higher financial risks from healthcare expenditures. Although positive progress in financial risk protection has been achieved in recent years, China has disproportionately high incidences of CHE and MI, compared to other countries.

CONCLUSION

China has large margins for improvements in risk financial protection, with large inequalities across subgroups. Providing better financial protection for low-income groups in rural areas is the key to improve financial protection in China.

摘要

背景

提供财务风险保护是卫生系统的基本目标之一。灾难性卫生支出 (CHE) 和医疗贫困 (MI) 是评估卫生财务风险保护的两个常见指标。随着中国继续进行卫生系统改革,以提供可及和负担得起的医疗保健,了解中国在财务风险保护方面的进展情况非常重要。然而,过去的研究表明 CHE 和 MI 的发生率存在差异。在本文中,我们使用来自四项全国性家庭调查的数据,根据不同的定义分析了中国在 CHE 和 MI 方面的水平和特征。

方法

我们使用 CHE 和 MI 的多个常规阈值来全面描述中国的财务风险保护水平。我们使用来自四项全国性家庭调查的数据来衡量 CHE 和 MI 的发生率及其在城乡和收入四分位数之间的不平等。使用 Probit 回归模型探讨 CHE 和 MI 的影响因素。

结果

我们发现,尽管采用了不同的抽样方法和问卷设计,但四项全国性家庭调查的 CHE 和 MI 发生率基本一致。在 2016-2017 年期间,以非食品支出的 40%为阈值,中国 CHE 的发生率为 14.95%-17.73%。同时,以 1.9 美元的贫困线为标准,MI 的发生率为 2.01%-5.63%。此外,农村居民、低收入群体和小家庭面临更高的医疗支出财务风险。尽管近年来在财务风险保护方面取得了积极进展,但与其他国家相比,中国 CHE 和 MI 的发生率相对较高,存在较大的不平等。

结论

中国在风险财务保护方面还有很大的改进空间,各亚组之间存在较大的不平等。为农村地区的低收入群体提供更好的财务保护是改善中国财务保护的关键。

相似文献

1
Understanding financial risk protection in China's health system: a descriptive analysis using data from multiple national household surveys.了解中国卫生系统中的财务风险保护:利用多项国家家庭调查数据进行的描述性分析。
BMC Public Health. 2023 Sep 19;23(1):1820. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-16679-4.
2
Protecting patients with cardiovascular diseases from catastrophic health expenditure and impoverishment by health finance reform.通过卫生筹资改革保护心血管疾病患者免受灾难性卫生支出和贫困之苦。
Trop Med Int Health. 2015 Dec;20(12):1846-54. doi: 10.1111/tmi.12611. Epub 2015 Oct 19.
3
Households forgoing healthcare as a measure of financial risk protection: an application to Liberia.作为金融风险保护措施而放弃医疗保健的家庭:以利比里亚为例。
Int J Equity Health. 2019 Dec 10;18(1):193. doi: 10.1186/s12939-019-1095-y.
4
Provincial variations in catastrophic health expenditure and medical impoverishment in China: a nationwide population-based study.中国灾难性卫生支出与医疗贫困的省级差异:一项基于全国人口的研究。
Lancet Reg Health West Pac. 2022 Nov 13;31:100633. doi: 10.1016/j.lanwpc.2022.100633. eCollection 2023 Feb.
5
Decomposing inequality in catastrophic health expenditure for self-reported hypertension household in Urban Shaanxi, China from 2008 to 2013: two waves' cross-sectional study.2008年至2013年中国陕西城市自我报告高血压家庭灾难性卫生支出不平等分解:两波横断面研究
BMJ Open. 2019 May 9;9(5):e023033. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023033.
6
Catastrophic healthcare expenditure and poverty related to out-of-pocket payments for healthcare in Bangladesh-an estimation of financial risk protection of universal health coverage.孟加拉国医疗保健支出的灾难性影响和与医疗保健自付费用相关的贫困问题——全民健康覆盖的财务风险保护评估。
Health Policy Plan. 2017 Oct 1;32(8):1102-1110. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czx048.
7
Does the universal medical insurance system reduce catastrophic health expenditure among middle-aged and elderly households in China? A longitudinal analysis.全民医疗保险制度是否降低了中国中老年人家庭的灾难性卫生支出?纵向分析。
Eur J Health Econ. 2021 Apr;22(3):463-471. doi: 10.1007/s10198-021-01267-3. Epub 2021 Feb 13.
8
Financial risk protection from out-of-pocket health spending in low- and middle-income countries: a scoping review of the literature.中低收入国家自付医疗支出的财务风险保护:文献综述。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2022 Jul 29;20(1):83. doi: 10.1186/s12961-022-00886-3.
9
Catastrophic health expenditure of cancer patients at the end-of-life: a retrospective observational study in China.癌症患者临终前的灾难性卫生支出:中国的一项回顾性观察研究。
BMC Palliat Care. 2019 May 23;18(1):43. doi: 10.1186/s12904-019-0426-5.
10
Occupational and geographical differentials in financial protection against healthcare out-of-pocket payments in Nepal: Evidence for universal health coverage.尼泊尔医疗保健自付费用的财务保护中的职业和地域差异:全民健康覆盖的证据。
PLoS One. 2023 Jan 27;18(1):e0280840. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0280840. eCollection 2023.

引用本文的文献

1
Provincial inequality of China's progress towards universal health coverage: An empirical analysis in 2016-21.中国全民健康覆盖进展的省级不平等:2016-2021 年的实证分析。
J Glob Health. 2024 Jun 28;14:04122. doi: 10.7189/jogh.14.04122.
2
A nationwide study of the impact of social quality factors on life satisfaction among older adults in rural China.一项全国性研究表明,社会质量因素对中国农村老年人生活满意度的影响。
Sci Rep. 2024 May 21;14(1):11614. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-61398-4.

本文引用的文献

1
Provincial variations in catastrophic health expenditure and medical impoverishment in China: a nationwide population-based study.中国灾难性卫生支出与医疗贫困的省级差异:一项基于全国人口的研究。
Lancet Reg Health West Pac. 2022 Nov 13;31:100633. doi: 10.1016/j.lanwpc.2022.100633. eCollection 2023 Feb.
2
Trends and projections of universal health coverage indicators in China, 1993-2030: An analysis of data from four nationwide household surveys.1993 - 2030年中国全民健康覆盖指标的趋势与预测:基于四项全国性家庭调查数据的分析
Lancet Reg Health West Pac. 2022 Nov 17;31:100646. doi: 10.1016/j.lanwpc.2022.100646. eCollection 2023 Feb.
3
Impact of mobile payment on physical health: Evidence from the 2017 China household finance survey.移动支付对身体健康的影响:来自 2017 年中国家庭金融调查的证据。
Front Public Health. 2022 Aug 1;10:963234. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.963234. eCollection 2022.
4
A 25-Year Trend of Catastrophic Health Expenditure and Its Inequality in China: Evidence from Longitudinal Data.中国灾难性卫生支出及其不平等的25年趋势:来自纵向数据的证据
Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2022 May 11;15:969-981. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S358641. eCollection 2022.
5
How do Chinese people perceive their healthcare system? Trends and determinants of public satisfaction and perceived fairness, 2006-2019.中国人如何看待他们的医疗体系?2006-2019 年公众满意度和感知公平性的趋势和决定因素。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Jan 4;22(1):22. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-07413-0.
6
Quality of public health insurance and individuals' consumption structure upgrades: evidence from China.公共医疗保险质量与个人消费结构升级:来自中国的证据
Health Econ Rev. 2021 Dec 3;11(1):45. doi: 10.1186/s13561-021-00343-x.
7
Hospital response to a case-based payment scheme under regional global budget: The case of Guangzhou in China.医院对区域总额预算下按病例支付方案的反应:以中国广州为例。
Soc Sci Med. 2022 Jan;292:114601. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114601. Epub 2021 Nov 24.
8
The Impact of Catastrophic Medical Insurance in China: A five-year patient-level panel study.中国大病医疗保险的影响:一项为期五年的患者层面面板研究。
Lancet Reg Health West Pac. 2021 Jul 5;13:100174. doi: 10.1016/j.lanwpc.2021.100174. eCollection 2021 Aug.
9
Lowering drug prices and enhancing pharmaceutical affordability: an analysis of the national volume-based procurement (NVBP) effect in China.降低药价和提高药品可负担性:中国基于全国药品集中采购的效果分析。
BMJ Glob Health. 2021 Sep;6(9). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2021-005519.
10
Measuring and evaluating progress towards Universal Health Coverage in China.衡量和评价中国全民健康覆盖的进展。
J Glob Health. 2021 May 1;11:08005. doi: 10.7189/jogh.11.08005.