Ranjan Alok, Crasta Jewel E
School of Liberal Arts, Centre for Emerging Technology and Sustainable Development, Indian Institute of Technology, Jodhpur, India.
Department of Global Health and Population, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, USA.
Int J Ment Health Syst. 2023 Sep 19;17(1):27. doi: 10.1186/s13033-023-00595-6.
Universal health coverage (UHC) has emerged as one of the important health policy discourses under the current sustainable development goals in the world. UHC in individual disease conditions is a must for attaining overall UHC. This study measures progress towards UHC in terms of access to health care and financial protection among individuals with mental disorders in India.
Data from the 75th Round National Sample Survey (NSS), 2017-18, was used, which is the latest round on health in India. Data collected from 555,115 individuals (rural: 325,232; urban: 229,232), from randomly selected 8077 villages and 6181 urban areas, included 283 outpatient and 374 hospitalization cases due to mental disorders in India. Logistic regression models were used for analyses.
Self-reporting of mental disorders was considerably lower than the actual disease burden in India. However, self-reporting of ailment was 1.73 times higher (95% CI: 1.18-2.52, p < 0.05) among the richest income group population compared to the poorest in India. The private sector was a major service provider of mental health services with a larger share for outpatient (66.1%) than inpatient care (59.2%). Over 63% of individuals with a mental disorder who reported private sector hospitalization noted unavailability or poor service quality at public facilities. Only 23% of individuals hospitalized had health insurance coverage at All India level. However, health insurance coverage among poorest economic class was a meagre 3.4%. Average out-of-pocket expenditure during hospitalization (public: 123 USD; private: 576 USD) and outpatient care (public: 8 USD; private: 37 USD) was significantly higher in the private sector than in the public sector. Chances of facing catastrophic health expenditure at 10% threshold were 23.33 times (95% CI: 10.85-50.17; p < 0.001) higher under private sector than public sector during hospitalization. Expenditure on medicine, as the share of total medical expenditure, was highest for hospitalization (public: 45%, private:39.5%) and outpatient care (public: 74.1%, private:39.7%).
Social determinants play a vital role in access to healthcare and financial protection among individuals with mental disorders in India. For achieving UHC in mental disorders, India needs to address the gaps in access and financial protection for individuals with mental disorders.
Not applicable.
全民健康覆盖(UHC)已成为当前世界可持续发展目标下重要的卫生政策议题之一。针对个别疾病状况实现全民健康覆盖是实现整体全民健康覆盖的必要条件。本研究从印度精神障碍患者获得医疗服务和财务保护的角度衡量全民健康覆盖的进展情况。
使用了2017 - 18年第75轮全国抽样调查(NSS)的数据,这是印度最新一轮的卫生调查数据。从随机选取的8077个村庄和6181个城市地区的555115个人(农村:325232人;城市:229232人)收集的数据中,包括印度283例门诊和374例因精神障碍住院的病例。采用逻辑回归模型进行分析。
在印度,精神障碍的自我报告率远低于实际疾病负担。然而,印度最富有收入群体人口的疾病自我报告率比最贫困群体高1.73倍(95%置信区间:1.18 - 2.52,p < 0.05)。私营部门是心理健康服务的主要提供者,其门诊服务份额(66.1%)高于住院护理份额(59.2%)。超过63%报告在私营部门住院的精神障碍患者指出公共设施无法提供服务或服务质量差。在全印度层面,只有23%的住院患者有医疗保险覆盖。然而,最贫困经济阶层的医疗保险覆盖率仅为3.4%。住院期间(公立:123美元;私立:576美元)和门诊护理(公立:8美元;私立:37美元)的平均自付费用在私营部门显著高于公共部门。在住院期间,私营部门面临灾难性医疗支出(10%阈值)的几率比公共部门高23.33倍(95%置信区间:10.85 - 50.17;p < 0.001)。药品支出占总医疗支出的比例在住院(公立:45%,私立:39.5%)和门诊护理(公立:74.1%,私立:39.7%)中最高。
社会决定因素在印度精神障碍患者获得医疗服务和财务保护方面起着至关重要的作用。为了在精神障碍领域实现全民健康覆盖,印度需要解决精神障碍患者在获得服务和财务保护方面的差距。
不适用。