Zarbo Cristina, Zamparini Manuel, Patrono Alessandra, Calini Cosima, Harvey Philip D, Casiraghi Letizia, Clerici Massimo, Malvezzi Matteo, Rocchetti Matteo, Starace Fabrizio, de Girolamo Giovanni
Department of Psychology, University of Milano Bicocca, Milan, Italy.
Unit of Epidemiological and Evaluation Psychiatry, IRCCS Istituto Centro San Giovanni di Dio Fatebenefratelli, Brescia, Italy.
Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2023 Sep 20;33(1):e1992. doi: 10.1002/mpr.1992.
Evaluating emotional experiences in the life of people with Schizophrenia Spectrum Disorder (SSD) is fundamental for developing interventions aimed at promoting well-being in specific times and contexts. However, little is known about emotional variability in this population. In DiAPAson project, we evaluated between- and within-person differences in emotional intensity, variability, and instability between people with SSD and healthy controls, and the association with psychiatric severity and levels of functioning.
102 individuals diagnosed with SSD (57 residential patients, 46 outpatients) and 112 healthy controls were thoroughly evaluated. Daily emotions were prospectively assessed with Experience Sampling Method eight times a day for a week. Statistical analyses included ANOVA, correlations, and generalized linear models.
Participants with SSD, and especially residential patients, had a higher intensity of negative emotions when compared to controls. Moreover, all people with SSD reported a greater between-person-variability of both positive and negative emotions and greater intra-variability of negative emotions than healthy controls. In addition, the emotion variability in people with SSD does not follow a linear or quadratic trend but is more "chaotic" if compared to controls.
Adequate assessments of positive and negative emotional experiences and their time course in people with SSD can assist mental health professionals with well-being assessment, implementing targeted interventions through the identification of patterns, triggers, and potential predictors of emotional states.
评估精神分裂症谱系障碍(SSD)患者生活中的情感体验,对于制定旨在促进特定时期和情境下幸福感的干预措施至关重要。然而,对于这一人群的情绪变异性知之甚少。在DiAPAson项目中,我们评估了SSD患者与健康对照者在情绪强度、变异性和不稳定性方面的个体间差异和个体内差异,以及与精神疾病严重程度和功能水平的关联。
对102名被诊断为SSD的个体(57名住院患者,46名门诊患者)和112名健康对照者进行了全面评估。采用经验抽样法,在一周内每天对日常情绪进行八次前瞻性评估。统计分析包括方差分析、相关性分析和广义线性模型。
与对照组相比,SSD患者,尤其是住院患者,负面情绪强度更高。此外,所有SSD患者报告的积极和消极情绪的个体间变异性均大于健康对照者,消极情绪的个体内变异性也更大。此外,与对照组相比,SSD患者的情绪变异性不呈线性或二次趋势,而是更“混乱”。
对SSD患者的积极和消极情绪体验及其时间进程进行充分评估,有助于心理健康专业人员进行幸福感评估,通过识别情绪状态的模式、触发因素和潜在预测因素来实施有针对性的干预措施。