Brown Jenna A, Harrison Matthew R, Rufael Tecle, Roman-White Selina A, Ross Gregory B, George Fiji C, Zimmerle Daniel
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado 80524, United States.
SLR International Corp., Houston, Texas 77036, United States.
Environ Sci Technol. 2023 Oct 3;57(39):14539-14547. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.3c01321. Epub 2023 Sep 20.
Increased interest in greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, including recent legislative action and voluntary programs, has increased attention on quantifying and ultimately reducing methane emissions from the natural gas supply chain. While inventories used for public or corporate GHG policies have traditionally utilized bottom-up (BU) methods to estimate emissions, the validity of such inventories has been questioned. Therefore, there is attention on utilizing full-facility measurements using airborne, satellite, or drone (top-down (TD)) techniques to inform, improve, or validate inventories. This study utilized full-facility estimates from two independent TD methods at 15 midstream natural gas facilities in the U.S.A., which were compared with a contemporaneous daily inventory assembled by the facility operator, employing comprehensive inventory methods. Estimates from the two TD methods statistically agreed in 2 of 28 paired measurements. Operator inventories, which included extensions to capture sources beyond regular inventory requirements and integration of local measurements, estimated significantly lower emissions than the TD estimates for 40 of 43 paired comparisons. Significant disagreement was observed at most facilities, both between the two TD methods and between the TD estimates and operator inventory. These findings have two implications. First, improving inventory estimates will require additional on-site or ground-based diagnostic screening and measurement of all sources. Second, the TD full-facility measurement methods need to undergo further testing, characterization, and potential improvement specifically tailored for complex midstream facilities.
对温室气体(GHG)排放的关注度不断提高,包括近期的立法行动和自愿性计划,这使得人们更加关注量化并最终减少天然气供应链中的甲烷排放。虽然用于公共或企业温室气体政策的清单传统上采用自下而上(BU)的方法来估算排放量,但此类清单的有效性受到了质疑。因此,人们开始关注利用机载、卫星或无人机(自上而下(TD))技术进行全设施测量,以为清单提供信息、改进清单或验证清单。本研究利用了美国15个中游天然气设施的两种独立自上而下方法的全设施估算值,并将其与设施运营商采用综合清单方法编制的同期每日清单进行了比较。在28对配对测量中,两种自上而下方法的估算值在2对中统计上一致。运营商清单包括对常规清单要求之外的排放源进行扩展以及整合本地测量数据,在43对配对比较中,有40对的估算排放量明显低于自上而下的估算值。在大多数设施中,两种自上而下方法之间以及自上而下估算值与运营商清单之间都存在显著差异。这些发现有两个含义。首先,要改进清单估算,需要对所有排放源进行额外的现场或地面诊断筛查和测量。其次,自上而下的全设施测量方法需要进一步测试、表征,并针对复杂的中游设施进行专门改进。