Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, St Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Critical Care, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa.
PLoS One. 2023 Sep 20;18(9):e0291425. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0291425. eCollection 2023.
There is little prospective data to guide effective dosing for antibiotic prophylaxis during surgery requiring cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). We aim to describe the effects of CPB on the population pharmacokinetics (PK) of total and unbound concentrations of cefazolin and to recommend optimised dosing regimens.
Patients undergoing CPB for elective cardiac valve replacement were included using convenience sampling. Intravenous cefazolin (2g) was administered pre-incision and re-dosed at 4 hours. Serial blood and urine samples were collected and analysed using validated chromatography. Population PK modelling and Monte-Carlo simulations were performed using Pmetrics® to determine the fractional target attainment (FTA) of achieving unbound concentrations exceeding pre-defined exposures against organisms known to cause surgical site infections for 100% of surgery (100% fT>MIC).
From the 16 included patients, 195 total and 64 unbound concentrations of cefazolin were obtained. A three-compartment linear population PK model best described the data. We observed that cefazolin 2g 4-hourly was insufficient to achieve the FTA of 100% fT>MIC for Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli at serum creatinine concentrations ≤ 50 μmol/L and for Staphylococcus epidermidis at any of our simulated doses and serum creatinine concentrations. A dose of cefazolin 3g 4-hourly demonstrated >93% FTA for S. aureus and E. coli.
We found that cefazolin 2g 4-hourly was not able to maintain concentrations above the MIC for relevant pathogens in patients with low serum creatinine concentrations undergoing cardiac surgery with CPB. The simulations showed that optimised dosing is more likely with an increased dose and/or dosing frequency.
在需要体外循环 (CPB) 的手术中,用于抗生素预防的经验性给药剂量数据较少。我们旨在描述 CPB 对头孢唑林总浓度和游离浓度的群体药代动力学 (PK) 的影响,并推荐优化的给药方案。
采用便利抽样法纳入接受 CPB 择期心脏瓣膜置换术的患者。在切开前静脉注射头孢唑林 (2g),并在 4 小时后再次给药。采集和分析了一系列血样和尿样,使用验证的色谱法进行分析。使用 Pmetrics® 进行群体 PK 建模和 Monte-Carlo 模拟,以确定达到 100%手术(100% fT>MIC)的游离浓度超过预定义暴露的目标浓度的达标率(FTA)。
从 16 名纳入的患者中,共获得 195 个总浓度和 64 个游离浓度的头孢唑林。一个三房室线性群体 PK 模型最能描述数据。我们观察到,对于血清肌酐浓度≤50 μmol/L 的金黄色葡萄球菌和大肠杆菌,以及在我们模拟的任何剂量和血清肌酐浓度下的表皮葡萄球菌,头孢唑林 2g 4 小时给药不足以达到 100% fT>MIC 的 FTA。头孢唑林 3g 4 小时给药可达到>93%的金黄色葡萄球菌和大肠杆菌 FTA。
我们发现,对于接受 CPB 心脏手术且血清肌酐浓度较低的患者,头孢唑林 2g 4 小时给药无法维持相关病原体的浓度高于 MIC。模拟表明,增加剂量和/或给药频率更有可能优化给药。