• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

暴露于美国西海岸各州野火下的人群的社会脆弱性。

Social vulnerability of the people exposed to wildfires in U.S. West Coast states.

机构信息

Department of Civil Engineering, Boise State University, Boise, ID, USA.

Management of Complex Systems Department, University of California, Merced, CA, USA.

出版信息

Sci Adv. 2023 Sep 22;9(38):eadh4615. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.adh4615. Epub 2023 Sep 20.

DOI:10.1126/sciadv.adh4615
PMID:37729397
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10511185/
Abstract

Understanding of the vulnerability of populations exposed to wildfires is limited. We used an index from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention to assess the social vulnerability of populations exposed to wildfire from 2000-2021 in California, Oregon, and Washington, which accounted for 90% of exposures in the western United States. The number of people exposed to fire from 2000-2010 to 2011-2021 increased substantially, with the largest increase, nearly 250%, for people with high social vulnerability. In Oregon and Washington, a higher percentage of exposed people were highly vulnerable (>40%) than in California (~8%). Increased social vulnerability of populations in burned areas was the primary contributor to increased exposure of the highly vulnerable in California, whereas encroachment of wildfires on vulnerable populations was the primary contributor in Oregon and Washington. Our results emphasize the importance of integrating the vulnerability of at-risk populations in wildfire mitigation and adaptation plans.

摘要

对暴露于野火人群脆弱性的了解有限。我们使用了美国疾病控制与预防中心的一个指数,来评估 2000-2021 年加利福尼亚州、俄勒冈州和华盛顿州暴露于野火人群的社会脆弱性,这些地区占美国西部暴露人数的 90%。2000-2010 年至 2011-2021 年期间,暴露于火灾的人数大幅增加,其中社会脆弱性高的人群增幅最大,近 250%。在俄勒冈州和华盛顿州,高脆弱性人群(>40%)的暴露比例高于加利福尼亚州(~8%)。在加利福尼亚州,受火灾影响地区人群的社会脆弱性增加是导致高脆弱性人群暴露增加的主要原因,而俄勒冈州和华盛顿州则是野火侵袭脆弱人群导致的。我们的研究结果强调了将处于危险中的人群的脆弱性纳入野火缓解和适应计划的重要性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9fac/10511185/f63795f32c64/sciadv.adh4615-f5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9fac/10511185/98bfca1edf51/sciadv.adh4615-f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9fac/10511185/7d9474631e2d/sciadv.adh4615-f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9fac/10511185/f8ad16a133ac/sciadv.adh4615-f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9fac/10511185/5f15c98e9b4b/sciadv.adh4615-f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9fac/10511185/f63795f32c64/sciadv.adh4615-f5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9fac/10511185/98bfca1edf51/sciadv.adh4615-f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9fac/10511185/7d9474631e2d/sciadv.adh4615-f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9fac/10511185/f8ad16a133ac/sciadv.adh4615-f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9fac/10511185/5f15c98e9b4b/sciadv.adh4615-f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9fac/10511185/f63795f32c64/sciadv.adh4615-f5.jpg

相似文献

1
Social vulnerability of the people exposed to wildfires in U.S. West Coast states.暴露于美国西海岸各州野火下的人群的社会脆弱性。
Sci Adv. 2023 Sep 22;9(38):eadh4615. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.adh4615. Epub 2023 Sep 20.
2
Exposure to Smoke From Wildfire, Prescribed, and Agricultural Burns Among At-Risk Populations Across Washington, Oregon, and California.华盛顿州、俄勒冈州和加利福尼亚州高危人群接触野火、规定燃烧和农业焚烧产生的烟雾的情况。
Geohealth. 2024 Apr 22;8(4):e2023GH000961. doi: 10.1029/2023GH000961. eCollection 2024 Apr.
3
Shifting social-ecological fire regimes explain increasing structure loss from Western wildfires.不断变化的社会生态火灾模式解释了美国西部野火造成的结构损失增加的原因。
PNAS Nexus. 2023 Feb 1;2(3):pgad005. doi: 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgad005. eCollection 2023 Mar.
4
Matching methods to quantify wildfire effects on forest carbon mass in the U.S. Pacific Northwest.匹配方法以量化美国太平洋西北地区野火对森林碳质量的影响。
Ecol Appl. 2021 Apr;31(3):e02283. doi: 10.1002/eap.2283. Epub 2021 Feb 9.
5
Understanding the Factors that Influence Perceptions of Post-Wildfire Landscape Recovery Across 25 Wildfires in the Northwestern United States.理解影响美国西北部 25 起野火后景观恢复感知的因素。
Environ Manage. 2018 Jan;61(1):85-102. doi: 10.1007/s00267-017-0962-9. Epub 2017 Nov 25.
6
Evidence of increasing wildfire damage with decreasing property price in Southern California fires.在南加州火灾中,随着房产价格下降野火破坏加剧的证据。
PLoS One. 2024 Apr 24;19(4):e0300346. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0300346. eCollection 2024.
7
Responses to Wildfire and Prescribed Fire Smoke: A Survey of a Medically Vulnerable Adult Population in the Wildland-Urban Interface, Mariposa County, California.对野火和计划火烧烟的反应:加利福尼亚马里波萨县城乡交错带医学脆弱成年人群的调查。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Jan 10;20(2):1210. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20021210.
8
Clearing the air: evaluating institutions' social media health messaging on wildfire and smoke risks in the US Pacific Northwest.净化空气:评估美国太平洋西北地区各机构在社交媒体上发布的有关野火和烟雾风险的健康信息
BMC Public Health. 2024 Feb 5;24(1):379. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-17907-1.
9
Spot-fire distance increases disproportionately for wildfires compared to prescribed fires as grasslands transition to Juniperus woodlands.与计划火烧相比,草原向杜松林地过渡时,野火的点状火距离不成比例地增加。
PLoS One. 2023 Apr 11;18(4):e0283816. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0283816. eCollection 2023.
10
Health Impact Assessment of PM attributable mortality from the September 2020 Washington State Wildfire Smoke Episode.2020年9月华盛顿州野火烟雾事件中可归因于细颗粒物(PM)的死亡率的健康影响评估。
medRxiv. 2020 Oct 20:2020.09.19.20197921. doi: 10.1101/2020.09.19.20197921.

引用本文的文献

1
Inequities in weathering California wildfires.加利福尼亚州野火影响中的不平等现象。
Health Aff Sch. 2025 Jul 23;3(8):qxaf147. doi: 10.1093/haschl/qxaf147. eCollection 2025 Aug.
2
Advancing new metrics for wildfire smoke exposure: case study in Alaska to bridge public health, climate adaptation, and fire management.推进野火烟雾暴露的新指标:阿拉斯加的案例研究,以衔接公共卫生、气候适应和火灾管理。
Environ Res Lett. 2025 Aug 1;20(8):084073. doi: 10.1088/1748-9326/adeff6. Epub 2025 Jul 25.
3
Quantifying wildfire risk to the built environment in rural rangelands of the US Interior West.

本文引用的文献

1
Elevation-dependent intensification of fire danger in the western United States.美国西部火险随海拔升高而加剧。
Nat Commun. 2023 Mar 30;14(1):1773. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-37311-4.
2
Shifting social-ecological fire regimes explain increasing structure loss from Western wildfires.不断变化的社会生态火灾模式解释了美国西部野火造成的结构损失增加的原因。
PNAS Nexus. 2023 Feb 1;2(3):pgad005. doi: 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgad005. eCollection 2023 Mar.
3
A burning issue: Reviewing the socio-demographic and environmental justice aspects of the wildfire literature.
量化美国内陆西部农村牧场建筑环境面临的野火风险。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2025 Apr;380(1924):20230457. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2023.0457. Epub 2025 Apr 17.
4
Wildfire impacts and mitigation strategies among California cannabis producers.加利福尼亚州大麻种植者面临的野火影响及缓解策略
PLoS One. 2025 Apr 11;20(4):e0321476. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0321476. eCollection 2025.
5
Addressing the impact of forest fires in Quito on youth health.应对基多森林火灾对青少年健康的影响。
Front Public Health. 2025 Jan 21;13:1532865. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1532865. eCollection 2025.
一个亟待解决的问题:回顾野火文献中的社会人口和环境正义方面。
PLoS One. 2022 Jul 28;17(7):e0271019. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0271019. eCollection 2022.
4
Short-Term Exposure to Wildfire Smoke and and Cognitive Performance in a Brain-Training Game: A Longitudinal Study of U.S. Adults.短期暴露于野火烟雾与认知表现:美国成年人脑训练游戏的纵向研究。
Environ Health Perspect. 2022 Jun;130(6):67005. doi: 10.1289/EHP10498. Epub 2022 Jun 14.
5
Wildfire, Smoke Exposure, Human Health, and Environmental Justice Need to be Integrated into Forest Restoration and Management.野火、烟雾暴露、人类健康和环境正义需要纳入森林恢复和管理中。
Curr Environ Health Rep. 2022 Sep;9(3):366-385. doi: 10.1007/s40572-022-00355-7. Epub 2022 May 7.
6
Social vulnerability and aging of elderly people in the United States.美国老年人的社会脆弱性与老龄化
SSM Popul Health. 2021 Sep 20;16:100924. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2021.100924. eCollection 2021 Dec.
7
Warming enabled upslope advance in western US forest fires.变暖使美国西部森林火灾呈上坡式推进。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Jun 1;118(22). doi: 10.1073/pnas.2009717118.
8
Disproportionate Impacts of Wildfires among Elderly and Low-Income Communities in California from 2000-2020.2000 - 2020年加利福尼亚州野火对老年人和低收入社区的不均衡影响
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Apr 8;18(8):3921. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18083921.
9
The (in)visible victims of disaster: Understanding the vulnerability of undocumented Latino/a and indigenous immigrants.灾难的(隐形)受害者:理解无证拉丁裔和原住民移民的脆弱性。
Geoforum. 2020 Nov;116:50-62. doi: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2020.07.007. Epub 2020 Aug 7.
10
Measuring Community Vulnerability to Natural and Anthropogenic Hazards: The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Social Vulnerability Index.衡量社区对自然和人为灾害的脆弱性:疾病控制与预防中心的社会脆弱性指数
J Environ Health. 2018 Jun;80(10):34-36.