Suppr超能文献

分析儿童的面部动作单元,以区分在下颌神经阻滞时的真实和虚假疼痛:一项横断面研究。

Analyzing facial action units in children to differentiate genuine and fake pain during inferior alveolar nerve block: a cross-sectional study.

机构信息

Faculty of Dentistry, Damascus University, Damascus, Syrian Arab Republic.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2023 Sep 20;13(1):15564. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-42982-6.

Abstract

This study aimed to investigate the association between facial action units and pain levels in Syrian children, focusing on both genuine and fake pain expressions. A total of 300 Syrian children aged 6-9 years participated in the study. Pain levels were assessed using the validated Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability scale, and facial expressions were analyzed using the Facial Action Coding System. The children were asked to mimic their feelings after receiving a dental injection to elicit fake pain expressions. Statistical analysis, including multinomial logistic regression and chi-square tests, was conducted to determine the Action Units (AUs) associated with each pain level and to compare the differences between real and fake pain expressions. The results revealed significant associations between specific AUs and pain levels. For real pain expressions, the most activated AUs across different pain levels with positive coefficient values of correlation (P-value < 0.01) were analyzed. In contrast, for fake pain expressions, AU12 and AU38 were consistently observed to be the most activated. These findings suggest that certain AUs are uniquely associated with fake pain expressions, distinct from those observed in real pain expressions. Furthermore, there were no significant differences between boys and girls in terms of their genuine and fake pain expressions, indicating a similar pattern of AU activation (P-value > 0.05). It was concluded that AUs 4, 6, 41, and 46 were associated with mild pain, and AUs 4, 6, 41, 46, and 11 were associated with moderate pain cases. In severe pain, AUs 4, 6, 7, 9, 11, and 43 were associated. In fake pain feelings, AU43, AU38, and AU12 were the most activated with no difference between boys and girls.

摘要

本研究旨在探讨叙利亚儿童面部动作单元与疼痛程度之间的关系,重点关注真实和虚假疼痛表情。共有 300 名 6-9 岁的叙利亚儿童参与了这项研究。使用经过验证的面部、腿部、活动、哭泣、安抚量表评估疼痛程度,并使用面部动作编码系统分析面部表情。要求孩子们在接受牙科注射后模仿自己的感觉,以引出虚假的疼痛表情。进行了统计分析,包括多项逻辑回归和卡方检验,以确定与每个疼痛程度相关的动作单元(AU),并比较真实和虚假疼痛表情之间的差异。结果表明,特定的 AU 与疼痛程度之间存在显著关联。对于真实的疼痛表情,分析了不同疼痛程度下具有正相关系数值(P 值<0.01)的最活跃 AU。相比之下,对于虚假的疼痛表情,AU12 和 AU38 被一致观察到是最活跃的。这些发现表明,某些 AU 与虚假疼痛表情独特相关,与真实疼痛表情中观察到的不同。此外,男孩和女孩在真实和虚假疼痛表情方面没有显著差异,表明 AU 激活模式相似(P 值>0.05)。研究得出结论,AU4、6、41 和 46 与轻度疼痛相关,AU4、6、41、46 和 11 与中度疼痛相关。在严重疼痛中,AU4、6、7、9、11 和 43 与疼痛相关。在虚假疼痛感觉中,AU43、AU38 和 AU12 是最活跃的,男孩和女孩之间没有差异。

相似文献

2
Automatic Coding of Facial Expressions of Pain: Are We There Yet?自动编码疼痛的面部表情:我们做到了吗?
Pain Res Manag. 2022 Jan 11;2022:6635496. doi: 10.1155/2022/6635496. eCollection 2022.
3
Genuine, suppressed and faked facial expressions of pain in children.儿童真实、被抑制和伪装的疼痛表情
Pain. 2006 Dec 15;126(1-3):64-71. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2006.06.013. Epub 2006 Jul 24.
5
Naturalistic Emotion Decoding From Facial Action Sets.基于面部动作集的自然主义情感解码
Front Psychol. 2019 Jan 18;9:2678. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02678. eCollection 2018.

本文引用的文献

2
CalliFACS: The common marmoset Facial Action Coding System.卡利 FACs:普通狨猴面部动作编码系统。
PLoS One. 2022 May 17;17(5):e0266442. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0266442. eCollection 2022.
10
A conceptual framework for "updating the definition of pain".“更新疼痛定义”的概念框架。
Pain. 2017 Jun;158(6):1177-1178. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000000878.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验