Dai Yuxing, Duan Kun, Huang Guangye, Yang Xuemin, Jiang Xingtao, Chen Jianwen, Liu Peiqing
Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
RELX Science Center, Shenzhen RELX Tech Co., Ltd., Shenzhen, China.
Front Toxicol. 2023 Sep 4;5:1232040. doi: 10.3389/ftox.2023.1232040. eCollection 2023.
Electronic cigarettes have become increasingly popular, but the results of previous studies on electronic cigarette exposure in animals have been equivocal. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of electronic cigarette smoke (ECS) and cigarette smoke (CS) on lung function and pulmonary inflammation in mice to investigate whether electronic cigarettes are safer when compared to cigarettes. 32 specific pathogen-free BALB/c male mice were randomly grouped and exposed to fresh air (control), mint-flavored ECS (ECS1, 6 mg/kg), cheese-flavored ECS (ECS2, 6 mg/kg), and CS (6 mg/kg). After 3 weeks exposure to ECS or CS, we measured lung function (PIF and Penh) and blood oxygen saturation. The levels of TNF-α and IL-6 in the bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) and serum were measured using ELISA. HE staining was performed to observe the pathological changes in the lung tissues. The levels of IL-6 in BALF and serum, and TNF-α in BALF, were elevated similarly in the ECS and CS groups compared to the control group. Significant elevation was observed in serum TNF-α levels in the CS group. The total count of cells in BALF were increased after ECS1 exposure and CS exposure. PIF and oxygen saturation decreased, and Penh increased markedly in the CS group but not in the ECS groups. Compared with the ECS groups, mice in the CS group had widened lung tissue septa and increased inflammatory cell infiltration. However, we did not detect significant differences between mint-flavored and cheese-flavored e-cigarettes in our study. Overall, our findings suggested that both ECS and CS impair lung function and histopathology while promoting inflammation. In contrast, ECS has a less negative impact than CS.
电子烟越来越受欢迎,但先前关于动物暴露于电子烟的研究结果并不明确。本研究旨在评估电子烟烟雾(ECS)和香烟烟雾(CS)对小鼠肺功能和肺部炎症的影响,以调查与香烟相比电子烟是否更安全。将32只无特定病原体的BALB/c雄性小鼠随机分组,使其暴露于新鲜空气(对照组)、薄荷味ECS(ECS1,6毫克/千克)、奶酪味ECS(ECS2,6毫克/千克)和CS(6毫克/千克)中。在暴露于ECS或CS 3周后,我们测量了肺功能(吸气峰流量和Penh)和血氧饱和度。使用酶联免疫吸附测定法测量支气管肺泡灌洗液(BALF)和血清中TNF-α和IL-6的水平。进行苏木精-伊红染色以观察肺组织的病理变化。与对照组相比,ECS组和CS组BALF和血清中IL-6的水平以及BALF中TNF-α的水平同样升高。CS组血清TNF-α水平显著升高。ECS1暴露和CS暴露后BALF中的细胞总数增加。CS组中吸气峰流量和血氧饱和度降低,Penh显著增加,而ECS组中未出现这种情况。与ECS组相比,CS组小鼠的肺组织间隔增宽,炎症细胞浸润增加。然而,在我们的研究中,未检测到薄荷味和奶酪味电子烟之间存在显著差异。总体而言,我们的研究结果表明,ECS和CS都会损害肺功能和组织病理学,同时促进炎症。相比之下,ECS的负面影响小于CS。