• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

应用 Dyna-computed tomography 辅助神经内镜血肿清除术治疗高血压性脑出血。

Use of Dyna-computed tomography-assisted neuroendoscopic hematoma evacuation in the treatment of hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage.

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.

Department of Neurosurgery, Taikang Tongji (Wuhan) Hospital, Wuhan, China.

出版信息

Neurosurg Rev. 2023 Sep 21;46(1):254. doi: 10.1007/s10143-023-02161-7.

DOI:10.1007/s10143-023-02161-7
PMID:37733100
Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate and summarize the technical characteristics and clinical efficacy of using Dyna-computed tomography (CT)-assisted neuroendoscopic hematoma evacuation to treat hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage (HICH). We treated 42 consecutive patients with HICH who underwent neuroendoscopic hematoma evacuation in our department from March 1, 2020, to May 31, 2022. Patients were divided into two groups: Dyna-CT-assisted neuroendoscopic group (n = 18) and neuroendoscopic group (n = 24). Retrospective data, treatment efficacy, and outcomes were collected and compared between these two groups. The operative time in the Dyna-CT-assisted neuroendoscopic group was significantly shorter than the operative time in the neuroendoscopic group (mean time 131.6 ± 13.51 vs. 156.6 ± 19.25 min, P < 0.001). Dyna-CT-assisted neuroendoscopic group had significantly less intraoperative blood loss than the neuroendoscopic group (46.94 ± 10.42 vs. 106.46 ± 23.25, P = 0.003). Meanwhile, patients who underwent Dyna-CT-assisted neuroendoscopic had a comparable hematoma clearance rate to those who underwent neuroendoscopic (89.36 ± 7.31 vs. 68.87 ± 19.44%, P = 0.006). The incidence of complications in the Dyna-CT-assisted neuroendoscopic group (5.5%) was lower than in the neuroendoscopic group (12.5%), but the difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.129). Patients who underwent Dyna-CT-assisted neuroendoscopic hematoma evacuation had better 6-month functional outcomes, and the difference was significant (P = 0.004). Furthermore, multivariable analysis showed that younger age, smaller hematoma volume, and Dyna-CT-assisted neuroendoscopic were predictors of favorable 6-month outcomes in HICH patients. In the treatment of HICH, Dyna-CT-assisted hematoma evacuation appears to be safer and more effective than neuroendoscopic hematoma evacuation. Dyna-CT-assisted neuroendoscopic hematoma evacuation in hybrid operating rooms may improve the clinical effect and outcomes of patients with HICH.

摘要

本研究旨在评估和总结使用 Dyna 计算机断层扫描(CT)辅助神经内镜血肿清除术治疗高血压性脑出血(HICH)的技术特点和临床疗效。我们对 2020 年 3 月 1 日至 2022 年 5 月 31 日在我科接受神经内镜血肿清除术的 42 例 HICH 患者进行了治疗。患者分为两组:Dyna-CT 辅助神经内镜组(n=18)和神经内镜组(n=24)。收集并比较了两组患者的回顾性资料、治疗效果和预后。Dyna-CT 辅助神经内镜组的手术时间明显短于神经内镜组(平均时间 131.6±13.51 分钟比 156.6±19.25 分钟,P<0.001)。Dyna-CT 辅助神经内镜组术中出血量明显少于神经内镜组(46.94±10.42 毫升比 106.46±23.25 毫升,P=0.003)。同时,Dyna-CT 辅助神经内镜组的血肿清除率与神经内镜组相当(89.36±7.31%比 68.87±19.44%,P=0.006)。Dyna-CT 辅助神经内镜组(5.5%)的并发症发生率低于神经内镜组(12.5%),但差异无统计学意义(P=0.129)。接受 Dyna-CT 辅助神经内镜血肿清除术的患者 6 个月后的功能预后更好,差异有统计学意义(P=0.004)。此外,多变量分析显示,年龄较小、血肿体积较小和 Dyna-CT 辅助神经内镜是 HICH 患者 6 个月预后良好的预测因素。在 HICH 的治疗中,Dyna-CT 辅助血肿清除术似乎比神经内镜血肿清除术更安全、更有效。杂交手术室中 Dyna-CT 辅助神经内镜血肿清除术可能改善 HICH 患者的临床效果和预后。

相似文献

1
Use of Dyna-computed tomography-assisted neuroendoscopic hematoma evacuation in the treatment of hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage.应用 Dyna-computed tomography 辅助神经内镜血肿清除术治疗高血压性脑出血。
Neurosurg Rev. 2023 Sep 21;46(1):254. doi: 10.1007/s10143-023-02161-7.
2
Effect of Robot-Assisted Neuroendoscopic Hematoma Evacuation Combined Intracranial Pressure Monitoring for the Treatment of Hypertensive Intracerebral Hemorrhage.机器人辅助神经内镜血肿清除术联合颅内压监测治疗高血压脑出血的效果
Front Neurol. 2021 Dec 2;12:722924. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2021.722924. eCollection 2021.
3
Neuroendoscopic-assisted versus mini-open craniotomy for hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage: a retrospective analysis.神经内镜辅助与小骨窗开颅术治疗高血压性脑出血的回顾性分析。
BMC Surg. 2022 May 14;22(1):188. doi: 10.1186/s12893-022-01642-8.
4
Letter to the editor: Use of dyna-computed tomography-assisted neuro endoscopic hematoma evacuation in the treatment of hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage.致编辑的信:动态计算机断层扫描辅助神经内镜血肿清除术在高血压性脑出血治疗中的应用
Neurosurg Rev. 2023 Oct 23;46(1):278. doi: 10.1007/s10143-023-02190-2.
5
Effectiveness of endoscopic surgery for supratentorial hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage: a comparison with craniotomy.内镜手术治疗幕上高血压性脑出血的效果:与开颅术的比较。
J Neurosurg. 2018 Feb;128(2):553-559. doi: 10.3171/2016.10.JNS161589. Epub 2017 Apr 7.
6
Comparison of the efficacy of neuronavigation-assisted intracerebral hematoma puncture and drainage with neuroendoscopic hematoma removal in treatment of hypertensive cerebral hemorrhage.神经导航辅助下颅内血肿穿刺引流术与神经内镜血肿清除术治疗高血压脑出血的疗效比较。
BMC Surg. 2024 Mar 12;24(1):86. doi: 10.1186/s12893-024-02378-3.
7
Neuroendoscopic Surgery versus Craniotomy for Supratentorial Hypertensive Intracerebral Hemorrhage: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.神经内镜手术与开颅手术治疗幕上高血压性脑出血的疗效比较:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
World Neurosurg. 2020 Feb;134:477-488. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.10.115. Epub 2019 Nov 15.
8
Clinical effects of neuroendoscopic hematoma evacuation for hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage.神经内镜血肿清除术治疗高血压性脑出血的临床疗效
Am J Transl Res. 2022 Feb 15;14(2):1084-1091. eCollection 2022.
9
Endoscopic Hematoma Evacuation for Intracerebral Hemorrhage Under Local Anesthesia: Factors That Affect the Hematoma Removal Rate.内镜下血肿清除术在局部麻醉下治疗脑出血:影响血肿清除率的因素。
World Neurosurg. 2019 Jun;126:e1330-e1336. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.03.089. Epub 2019 Mar 18.
10
Minimally Invasive Surgery for Patients with Hypertensive Intracerebral Hemorrhage with Large Hematoma Volume: A Retrospective Study.微创外科手术治疗大血肿量高血压性脑出血患者的回顾性研究
World Neurosurg. 2017 Sep;105:348-358. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2017.05.158. Epub 2017 Jun 29.

引用本文的文献

1
Role of disturbance coefficient in monitoring and treatment of cerebral edema in patients with cerebral hemorrhage.干扰系数在脑出血患者脑水肿监测与治疗中的作用
World J Clin Cases. 2025 May 16;13(14):102534. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v13.i14.102534.
2
Letter to the editor: Use of dyna-computed tomography-assisted neuro endoscopic hematoma evacuation in the treatment of hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage.致编辑的信:动态计算机断层扫描辅助神经内镜血肿清除术在高血压性脑出血治疗中的应用
Neurosurg Rev. 2023 Oct 23;46(1):278. doi: 10.1007/s10143-023-02190-2.

本文引用的文献

1
Neuroendoscopic-assisted versus mini-open craniotomy for hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage: a retrospective analysis.神经内镜辅助与小骨窗开颅术治疗高血压性脑出血的回顾性分析。
BMC Surg. 2022 May 14;22(1):188. doi: 10.1186/s12893-022-01642-8.
2
Clinical effects of neuroendoscopic hematoma evacuation for hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage.神经内镜血肿清除术治疗高血压性脑出血的临床疗效
Am J Transl Res. 2022 Feb 15;14(2):1084-1091. eCollection 2022.
3
Effect of Robot-Assisted Neuroendoscopic Hematoma Evacuation Combined Intracranial Pressure Monitoring for the Treatment of Hypertensive Intracerebral Hemorrhage.
机器人辅助神经内镜血肿清除术联合颅内压监测治疗高血压脑出血的效果
Front Neurol. 2021 Dec 2;12:722924. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2021.722924. eCollection 2021.
4
Feasibility of intraoperative computed tomography for endoscopic-assisted intraparenchymal hemorrhage evacuation.术中计算机断层扫描在神经内镜辅助下脑内血肿清除术中的可行性。
Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2021 Jan;200:106373. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2020.106373. Epub 2020 Nov 16.
5
Advances in Therapeutic Approaches for Spontaneous Intracerebral Hemorrhage.自发性脑出血治疗方法的进展。
Neurotherapeutics. 2020 Oct;17(4):1757-1767. doi: 10.1007/s13311-020-00902-w.
6
Intraoperative CT and cone-beam CT imaging for minimally invasive evacuation of spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage.术中 CT 和锥形束 CT 成像在自发性脑出血微创清除术中的应用。
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2020 Dec;162(12):3167-3177. doi: 10.1007/s00701-020-04284-y. Epub 2020 Mar 19.
7
Comparison of Surgical Outcomes and Recovery of Neurologic and Linguistic Functions in the Dominant Hemisphere After Basal Ganglia Hematoma Evacuation by Craniotomy versus Endoscopy.经颅手术与内镜手术治疗基底节血肿:对比术后优势半球神经和语言功能恢复的手术效果和康复情况。
World Neurosurg. 2019 Sep;129:e494-e501. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.05.193. Epub 2019 May 29.
8
Perihematomal Edema After Spontaneous Intracerebral Hemorrhage.自发性脑出血后的血肿周围水肿
Stroke. 2019 Jun;50(6):1626-1633. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.119.024965. Epub 2019 May 2.
9
Cerebral Intraparenchymal Hemorrhage: A Review.脑实质内出血:综述。
JAMA. 2019 Apr 2;321(13):1295-1303. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.2413.
10
Intracerebral haemorrhage: current approaches to acute management.脑出血:急性处理的当前方法。
Lancet. 2018 Oct 6;392(10154):1257-1268. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31878-6.