• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

双眼竞争中眼间分组需求的影响。

Effects of interocular grouping demands on binocular rivalry.

机构信息

Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.

Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.

出版信息

J Vis. 2023 Sep 1;23(10):15. doi: 10.1167/jov.23.10.15.

DOI:10.1167/jov.23.10.15
PMID:37733337
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10517422/
Abstract

Binocular rivalry (BR) is a visual phenomenon in which perception alternates between two non-fusible images presented to each eye. Transition periods between dominant and suppressed images are marked by mixed percepts, where participants report fragments of each image being dynamically perceived. Interestingly, BR remains robust even when typical images are subdivided and presented in complementary patches to each eye, a phenomenon termed interocular grouping (IOG). The objective of the present study was to determine if increasing grouping demand in the context of BR changes the perceptual experience of rivalry. In 48 subjects with normal vision, mean dominant and mixed percept durations were recorded for classic BR and IOG conditions with increasing grouping demands from two, four, and six patches. We found that, as grouping demands increased, the duration of mixed periods increased. Indeed, durations of dominant and mixed percepts, as well as percentage of time spent in dominant or mixed state, differed significantly across conditions. However, durations of global dominant percepts remained relatively stable and saturated at about 1.5 seconds, despite the exponential increase in possible mixed combinations. Evidence shows that this saturation followed a nonlinear trend. The data also indicate that grouping across the vertical meridian is slightly more stable than for the horizontal meridian. Finally, individual differences in speed of alternation identified during BR were maintained in all interocular grouping conditions. These results provide new information about binocular visual spatial integration and will be useful for future studies of the underlying neural substrates and models of binocular vision.

摘要

双眼竞争(BR)是一种视觉现象,其中感知在呈现给每只眼睛的两个不可融合的图像之间交替。在主导和被抑制的图像之间的过渡期间,会出现混合感知,参与者报告每个图像的片段被动态感知。有趣的是,即使典型的图像被细分并以互补的补丁呈现给每只眼睛,BR 仍然很稳健,这种现象称为眼间分组(IOG)。本研究的目的是确定在 BR 背景下增加分组需求是否会改变竞争的感知体验。在 48 名具有正常视力的受试者中,记录了经典 BR 和 IOG 条件下的平均主导和混合感知持续时间,分组需求从两个、四个和六个补丁增加。我们发现,随着分组需求的增加,混合期的持续时间增加。实际上,主导和混合感知的持续时间以及处于主导或混合状态的时间百分比在不同条件下有显著差异。然而,全局主导感知的持续时间相对稳定,在大约 1.5 秒处饱和,尽管可能的混合组合呈指数增长。证据表明这种饱和遵循非线性趋势。数据还表明,垂直子午线的分组比水平子午线略稳定。最后,在 BR 期间确定的交替速度个体差异在所有眼间分组条件下均保持不变。这些结果提供了关于双眼视觉空间整合的新信息,将有助于未来对双眼视觉的潜在神经基质和模型的研究。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a3d/10517422/2e7b5a56024d/jovi-23-10-15-f008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a3d/10517422/435457351d4b/jovi-23-10-15-f001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a3d/10517422/66ea04427b55/jovi-23-10-15-f002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a3d/10517422/2bcde6ab22d5/jovi-23-10-15-f003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a3d/10517422/1d28b3dc7cb9/jovi-23-10-15-f004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a3d/10517422/0736157e880b/jovi-23-10-15-f005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a3d/10517422/02b7674c1a01/jovi-23-10-15-f006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a3d/10517422/09bbe98e93be/jovi-23-10-15-f007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a3d/10517422/2e7b5a56024d/jovi-23-10-15-f008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a3d/10517422/435457351d4b/jovi-23-10-15-f001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a3d/10517422/66ea04427b55/jovi-23-10-15-f002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a3d/10517422/2bcde6ab22d5/jovi-23-10-15-f003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a3d/10517422/1d28b3dc7cb9/jovi-23-10-15-f004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a3d/10517422/0736157e880b/jovi-23-10-15-f005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a3d/10517422/02b7674c1a01/jovi-23-10-15-f006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a3d/10517422/09bbe98e93be/jovi-23-10-15-f007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a3d/10517422/2e7b5a56024d/jovi-23-10-15-f008.jpg

相似文献

1
Effects of interocular grouping demands on binocular rivalry.双眼竞争中眼间分组需求的影响。
J Vis. 2023 Sep 1;23(10):15. doi: 10.1167/jov.23.10.15.
2
The role of pattern coherence in interocular grouping during binocular rivalry: Insights from individual differences.模式连贯性在双眼竞争期间的双眼分组中的作用:个体差异的见解。
Vision Res. 2024 Jun;219:108401. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2024.108401. Epub 2024 Apr 3.
3
Nonlinear SSVEP responses are sensitive to the perceptual binding of visual hemifields during conventional 'eye' rivalry and interocular 'percept' rivalry.在传统的“眼”竞争和双眼“感知”竞争过程中,非线性稳态视觉诱发电位反应对视觉半视野的感知绑定敏感。
Brain Res. 2009 Jan 28;1251:245-55. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2008.09.086. Epub 2008 Oct 14.
4
Symmetry of generalized rivalry network models determines patterns of interocular grouping in four-location binocular rivalry.广义竞争网络模型的对称性决定了四位置双眼竞争中的眼间分组模式。
J Neurophysiol. 2019 Nov 1;122(5):1989-1999. doi: 10.1152/jn.00438.2019. Epub 2019 Sep 18.
5
Interocular Grouping in Perceptual Rivalry Localized with fMRI.功能磁共振成像定位知觉拮抗中的双眼分组。
Brain Topogr. 2021 May;34(3):323-336. doi: 10.1007/s10548-021-00834-4. Epub 2021 Apr 19.
6
Binocular rivalry from luminance and contrast.来自亮度和对比度的双眼竞争。
Vision Res. 2020 Oct;175:41-50. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2020.06.006. Epub 2020 Jul 18.
7
Age-dependency in binocular rivalry is reflected by exclusive percepts, not mixed percepts.双眼竞争中的年龄依赖性反映在独占知觉中,而不是混合知觉中。
Sci Rep. 2019 Dec 17;9(1):19271. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-55890-5.
8
A fresh look at interocular grouping during binocular rivalry.重新审视双眼竞争中的眼间分组现象。
Vision Res. 2004 May;44(10):983-91. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2003.12.007.
9
What is Grouping during Binocular Rivalry?双眼竞争中分组现象是什么?
Front Hum Neurosci. 2011 Oct 18;5:117. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2011.00117. eCollection 2011.
10
Stimulus flicker alters interocular grouping during binocular rivalry.刺激闪烁在双眼竞争期间改变双眼分组。
Vision Res. 2007 Jan;47(1):1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2006.09.007. Epub 2006 Nov 2.

本文引用的文献

1
Distinct dorsal and ventral streams for binocular rivalry dominance and suppression revealed by magnetoencephalography.通过脑磁图揭示双眼竞争优势和抑制的背侧和腹侧流的独特性。
Eur J Neurosci. 2023 Apr;57(8):1317-1334. doi: 10.1111/ejn.15955. Epub 2023 Mar 17.
2
Visual consciousness dynamics in adults with and without autism.自闭症成人与非自闭症成人的视觉意识动态。
Sci Rep. 2022 Mar 14;12(1):4376. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-08108-0.
3
Interocular Grouping in Perceptual Rivalry Localized with fMRI.功能磁共振成像定位知觉拮抗中的双眼分组。
Brain Topogr. 2021 May;34(3):323-336. doi: 10.1007/s10548-021-00834-4. Epub 2021 Apr 19.
4
Binocular rivalry from luminance and contrast.来自亮度和对比度的双眼竞争。
Vision Res. 2020 Oct;175:41-50. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2020.06.006. Epub 2020 Jul 18.
5
Bistable perception: neural bases and usefulness in psychological research.双稳态知觉:神经基础及其在心理学研究中的效用
Int J Psychol Res (Medellin). 2018 Jul-Dec;11(2):63-76. doi: 10.21500/20112084.3375.
6
Binocular rivalry dynamics associated with high levels of self-reported autistic traits suggest an imbalance of cortical excitation and inhibition.与高水平自我报告的自闭症特征相关的双眼竞争动态表明皮质兴奋和抑制的失衡。
Behav Brain Res. 2020 Jun 18;388:112603. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2020.112603. Epub 2020 Mar 25.
7
Symmetry of generalized rivalry network models determines patterns of interocular grouping in four-location binocular rivalry.广义竞争网络模型的对称性决定了四位置双眼竞争中的眼间分组模式。
J Neurophysiol. 2019 Nov 1;122(5):1989-1999. doi: 10.1152/jn.00438.2019. Epub 2019 Sep 18.
8
Humans Perceive Binocular Rivalry and Fusion in a Tristable Dynamic State.人类在三稳态动态状态下感知双眼竞争和融合。
J Neurosci. 2019 Oct 23;39(43):8527-8537. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0713-19.2019. Epub 2019 Sep 13.
9
Tagged MEG measures binocular rivalry in a cortical network that predicts alternation rate.标记的 MEG 测量了预测交替率的皮质网络中的双眼竞争。
PLoS One. 2019 Jul 11;14(7):e0218529. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0218529. eCollection 2019.
10
Slower and Less Variable Binocular Rivalry Rates in Patients With Bipolar Disorder, OCD, Major Depression, and Schizophrenia.双相情感障碍、强迫症、重度抑郁症和精神分裂症患者的双眼竞争率较慢且变异性较小。
Front Neurosci. 2019 May 21;13:514. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2019.00514. eCollection 2019.