• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

理解来自国家健康老龄化趋势研究的老年人使用轮椅的情况。

Understanding Wheelchair Use in Older Adults From the National Health and Aging Trends Study.

机构信息

Department of Kinesiology and Community Health, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, IL.

Department of Kinesiology and Community Health, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, IL.

出版信息

Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2024 Mar;105(3):514-524. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2023.09.006. Epub 2023 Sep 20.

DOI:10.1016/j.apmr.2023.09.006
PMID:37734645
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To identify the trends of wheelchair use and physical characteristics among older people who used wheelchairs relative to those who did not.

DESIGN

Cohort and survey.

SETTING

General community.

PARTICIPANTS

7026 participants (N=7026) were selected from the 2011 cohort of the National Health and Aging Trends Study (NHATS), which is made up of Medicare beneficiaries over the age of 65. Repeated observations among participants in the 2011 cohort were analyzed in the 4 following rounds: 2013 (N=4454), 2015 (N=3327), 2017 (N=2623), and 2019 (N=2091). Participants were divided into 2 groups: those who used and did not use wheelchairs.

INTERVENTIONS

Not applicable.

MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURES

Physical characteristics, including pain, strength limitation, balance problems, mobility disability, as well as the frequency of going outside.

RESULTS

The number of older adults who use wheelchairs had increased significantly from 4.7 per 100 people in 2011 to 7.1 in 2019 (P<.001). The logistic regression analysis indicated that participants who reported less frequently going out were at least 4.27 times more likely to be wheelchair users than non-wheelchair users (P<.01). Participants who reported health and physical problems were at least 2.48 times more likely to be wheelchair users than non-wheelchair users from 2011 to 2017 (P<.0001). Balance or coordination problems increased (24%-38%) significantly among non-wheelchair users from 2011 to 2019 (all P<.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Current wheelchair users reported more physical difficulties and were much less likely to go outside. This lower outdoor mobility could be due to physical difficulties or potential barriers in physical and socio-cultural environments. In addition, older adults who do not use wheelchairs showed increasing physical problems over time (including balance or coordination problems). Clinicians should consider older wheelchair users' health and physical limitations when prescribing wheelchairs.

摘要

目的

确定使用轮椅的老年人与未使用轮椅的老年人在轮椅使用趋势和身体特征方面的差异。

设计

队列研究和调查。

地点

一般社区。

参与者

从国家健康老龄化趋势研究(NHATS)2011 年队列中选择了 7026 名参与者(N=7026),该研究由 65 岁以上的医疗保险受益人组成。对 2011 年队列中参与者的重复观察在以下 4 个后续轮次中进行分析:2013 年(N=4454)、2015 年(N=3327)、2017 年(N=2623)和 2019 年(N=2091)。参与者分为两组:使用轮椅和不使用轮椅的组。

干预措施

无。

主要观察指标

身体特征,包括疼痛、力量受限、平衡问题、移动障碍以及外出频率。

结果

使用轮椅的老年人数量从 2011 年的每 100 人 4.7 人显著增加到 2019 年的每 100 人 7.1 人(P<.001)。逻辑回归分析表明,外出频率较低的参与者成为轮椅使用者的可能性至少是不使用轮椅者的 4.27 倍(P<.01)。从 2011 年到 2017 年,报告有健康和身体问题的参与者成为轮椅使用者的可能性至少是不使用轮椅者的 2.48 倍(P<.0001)。从 2011 年到 2019 年,不使用轮椅的参与者的平衡或协调问题显著增加(24%-38%)(均 P<.05)。

结论

目前的轮椅使用者报告有更多的身体困难,外出的可能性要小得多。这种较低的户外活动能力可能是由于身体困难或身体和社会文化环境中的潜在障碍造成的。此外,不使用轮椅的老年人随着时间的推移表现出越来越多的身体问题(包括平衡或协调问题)。临床医生在为轮椅使用者开处方时应考虑到他们的健康和身体限制。

相似文献

1
Understanding Wheelchair Use in Older Adults From the National Health and Aging Trends Study.理解来自国家健康老龄化趋势研究的老年人使用轮椅的情况。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2024 Mar;105(3):514-524. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2023.09.006. Epub 2023 Sep 20.
2
Disparities in wheelchair procurement by payer among people with spinal cord injury.脊髓损伤患者中不同支付方在轮椅采购方面的差异。
PM R. 2014 May;6(5):412-7. doi: 10.1016/j.pmrj.2013.11.004. Epub 2013 Nov 7.
3
Wheelchair mobility, motor performance and participation of adult wheelchair users with ARSACS: a cross-sectional study.成人肌萎缩性脊髓侧索硬化症患者的轮椅移动能力、运动表现和参与度:一项横断面研究。
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2023 May;18(4):378-386. doi: 10.1080/17483107.2020.1858195. Epub 2020 Dec 12.
4
Demographic and socioeconomic factors associated with disparity in wheelchair customizability among people with traumatic spinal cord injury.与创伤性脊髓损伤患者轮椅可定制性差异相关的人口统计学和社会经济因素。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004 Nov;85(11):1859-64. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2004.07.347.
5
Recipients of electric-powered indoor/outdoor wheelchairs provided by a national health service: a cross-sectional study.由国家卫生服务提供的电动室内/室外轮椅的使用者:一项横断面研究。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2013 Dec;94(12):2403-2409. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2013.07.010. Epub 2013 Jul 23.
6
Determinants of physical activity in wheelchair users with spinal cord injury or lower limb amputation: perspectives of rehabilitation professionals and wheelchair users.脊髓损伤或下肢截肢轮椅使用者身体活动的决定因素:康复专业人员和轮椅使用者的观点。
Disabil Rehabil. 2020 Jul;42(14):1934-1941. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2019.1577503. Epub 2019 Mar 29.
7
Relationships Between Wheelchair Services Received and Wheelchair User Outcomes in Less-Resourced Settings: A Cross-Sectional Survey in Kenya and the Philippines.资源较少环境下接受的轮椅服务与轮椅使用者结局之间的关系:肯尼亚和菲律宾的横断面调查
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2019 Sep;100(9):1648-1654.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2019.02.002. Epub 2019 Mar 7.
8
Development and feasibility of an automated call monitoring intervention for older wheelchair users: the MOvIT project.针对老年轮椅使用者的自动通话监测干预措施的开发与可行性研究:MOvIT项目
BMC Health Serv Res. 2015 Sep 16;15:386. doi: 10.1186/s12913-015-1048-0.
9
Type and frequency of wheelchair repairs and resulting adverse consequences among veteran wheelchair users.退伍军人轮椅使用者轮椅维修的类型和频率及其产生的不良后果。
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2022 Apr;17(3):331-337. doi: 10.1080/17483107.2020.1785559. Epub 2020 Aug 7.
10
Differences in participation based on self-esteem in power and manual wheelchair users on a university campus: a pilot study.大学校园中电动轮椅和手动轮椅使用者基于自尊的参与差异:一项试点研究。
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2015 Mar;10(2):102-7. doi: 10.3109/17483107.2013.840864. Epub 2013 Oct 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Incidence and dynamics of mobility device use among community-dwelling older adults in the United States.美国社区居住老年人使用移动设备的发生率及动态变化
J Elder Policy. 2024 Oct;3(2):70-94. doi: 10.1002/jey2.12011. Epub 2024 Sep 25.
2
A Practical Cardiovascular Health Assessment for Manual Wheelchair Users During the 6-Minute Push Test.手动轮椅使用者在6分钟推轮椅测试期间的实用心血管健康评估
Sensors (Basel). 2025 Apr 5;25(7):2313. doi: 10.3390/s25072313.
3
Designing for the Intersection of Aging and Disability: Application of the TechSAge Technology Intervention Model.
为老龄化与残疾的交叉领域进行设计:TechSAge技术干预模型的应用
Gerontologist. 2025 Jun 12;65(7). doi: 10.1093/geront/gnaf109.
4
Clinical and physiological risk factors contributing to the restricted mobility in older adults: a longitudinal analysis.导致老年人活动受限的临床和生理风险因素:一项纵向分析。
BMC Geriatr. 2024 Jul 24;24(1):630. doi: 10.1186/s12877-024-05230-8.
5
Inertial Measurement Unit and Heart Rate Monitoring to Assess Cardiovascular Fitness of Manual Wheelchair Users during the Six-Minute Push Test.惯性测量单元和心率监测评估手动轮椅使用者在六分钟推动测试中的心血管健康状况。
Sensors (Basel). 2024 Jun 27;24(13):4172. doi: 10.3390/s24134172.
6
The association between physical activity and neck circumference with cardiovascular disease risk in older wheelchair users.身体活动与颈围与老年轮椅使用者心血管疾病风险的关系。
J Rehabil Med. 2024 Jun 19;56:jrm35279. doi: 10.2340/jrm.v56.35279.
7
Community mobility and participation assessment of manual wheelchair users: a review of current techniques and challenges.手动轮椅使用者的社区移动性与参与度评估:当前技术与挑战综述
Front Hum Neurosci. 2024 Jan 5;17:1331395. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2023.1331395. eCollection 2023.