• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在病房查房时出现敏感话题:BEDSIDE-OUTSIDE 试验的辅助分析。

Occurrence of sensitive topics during ward round: an ancillary analysis of the BEDSIDE-OUTSIDE trial.

机构信息

Department of Medical Communication / Psychosomatic Medicine, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.

Division of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Faculty of Psychology, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2023 Sep 21;13(9):e073584. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-073584.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2023-073584
PMID:37734895
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10514661/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Discussing sensitive topics (eg, medical uncertainty, social issues, non-adherence) during ward rounds is challenging and may negatively impact patient satisfaction with the healthcare they are receiving. In the previous multicentre randomised BEDSIDE-OUTSIDE trial focusing on communication during ward rounds, we investigated the interplay between sensitive topics and low reported satisfaction with care.

DESIGN

Pre-planned secondary analysis of a randomised controlled trial. For this analysis data of the original trial was pooled across intervention groups.

SETTING

Three Swiss teaching hospitals.

PARTICIPANTS

Adult patients hospitalised for medical care.

INTERVENTIONS

We analysed predefined sensitive health topics and specific elements of communication from audiotapes recorded during ward rounds, for both patients dealing with and without sensitive topics.

PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary endpoint was overall patient satisfaction with care; measured on a Visual Analogue Scale from 0 to 100. Secondary endpoints included duration of ward rounds and further satisfaction outcomes.

RESULTS

Of the 919 included patients, 474 had at least one sensitive topic including medical uncertainty (n=251), psychiatric comorbidities (n=161), tumour diagnosis (n=137) and social issues (n=125). Compared with patients without sensitive topics, patients with sensitive topics reported lower satisfaction with care (mean (SD), 87.7 (±14.6) vs 90.2 (±12.1), adjusted difference -2.5 (95% CI -4.28 to -0.72), p=0.006. Among patients with sensitive topics, risk factors for low satisfaction included several parameters concerning patient-physician interaction such as disagreements during ward rounds (mean (SD), 14/212 (6.6%) vs 41/254 (16.1%), adjusted OR 2.78 (95% CI 1.47 to 5.27), p=0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

A large proportion of medical inpatients must deal with sensitive health topics. This is associated with lower satisfaction with care, particularly if the patient perceives the interaction with doctors during ward rounds as unsatisfactory. Educating physicians on specific communication techniques may help improve care for these patients.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT03210987.

摘要

目的

在查房过程中讨论敏感话题(如医疗不确定性、社会问题、不遵医嘱)具有挑战性,并且可能会对患者对所接受医疗服务的满意度产生负面影响。在之前的一项侧重于查房期间沟通的多中心随机 BEDSIDE-OUTSIDE 试验中,我们研究了敏感话题与护理满意度低之间的相互作用。

设计

对一项随机对照试验的预先计划的二次分析。在这项分析中,来自干预组的原始试验数据被汇总。

地点

瑞士三所教学医院。

参与者

因医疗护理住院的成年患者。

干预措施

我们分析了从查房期间录制的录音带中记录的预定敏感健康主题和特定沟通要素,适用于处理和不处理敏感主题的患者。

主要和次要结果测量

主要终点是患者对护理的整体满意度;使用 0 到 100 的视觉模拟量表进行测量。次要终点包括查房时间和进一步的满意度结果。

结果

在 919 名纳入的患者中,有 474 名患者至少有一个敏感话题,包括医疗不确定性(n=251)、精神共病(n=161)、肿瘤诊断(n=137)和社会问题(n=125)。与没有敏感话题的患者相比,有敏感话题的患者对护理的满意度较低(平均值(标准差),87.7(±14.6)与 90.2(±12.1),调整差异-2.5(95%CI-4.28 至-0.72),p=0.006)。在有敏感话题的患者中,低满意度的危险因素包括一些与医患互动有关的参数,例如查房期间的分歧(平均值(标准差),14/212(6.6%)与 41/254(16.1%),调整后的 OR 2.78(95%CI 1.47 至 5.27),p=0.002)。

结论

很大一部分住院患者必须处理敏感的健康话题。这与护理满意度降低有关,尤其是如果患者认为查房期间与医生的互动不满意。对医生进行特定沟通技巧的教育可能有助于改善对这些患者的护理。

试验注册号

NCT03210987。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d362/10514661/b437c607a3bc/bmjopen-2023-073584f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d362/10514661/b437c607a3bc/bmjopen-2023-073584f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d362/10514661/b437c607a3bc/bmjopen-2023-073584f01.jpg

相似文献

1
Occurrence of sensitive topics during ward round: an ancillary analysis of the BEDSIDE-OUTSIDE trial.在病房查房时出现敏感话题:BEDSIDE-OUTSIDE 试验的辅助分析。
BMJ Open. 2023 Sep 21;13(9):e073584. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-073584.
2
Perception of physicians and nursing staff members regarding outside versus bedside ward rounds: ancillary analysis of the randomised BEDSIDE-OUTSIDE trial.医生和护理人员对床边与非床边查房的看法:随机对照 BEDSIDE-OUTSIDE 试验的辅助分析。
Swiss Med Wkly. 2022 Jan 19;152:w30112. doi: 10.4414/smw.2022.w30112. eCollection 2022 Jan 17.
3
Effect of Bedside Compared With Outside the Room Patient Case Presentation on Patients' Knowledge About Their Medical Care : A Randomized, Controlled, Multicenter Trial.床边与房间外患者病例汇报对患者医疗知识的影响:一项随机、对照、多中心试验。
Ann Intern Med. 2021 Sep;174(9):1282-1292. doi: 10.7326/M21-0909. Epub 2021 Jun 29.
4
Patients' Preference for Participation in Medical Decision-Making: Secondary Analysis of the BEDSIDE-OUTSIDE Trial.患者对参与医疗决策的偏好:BEDSIDE-OUTSIDE 试验的二次分析。
J Gen Intern Med. 2023 Apr;38(5):1180-1189. doi: 10.1007/s11606-022-07775-z. Epub 2022 Sep 9.
5
Communication during ward rounds in internal medicine. An analysis of patient-nurse-physician interactions using RIAS.内科病房查房期间的沟通。使用互动分析系统对患者-护士-医生互动进行的分析。
Patient Educ Couns. 2007 Aug;67(3):343-8. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2007.04.011. Epub 2007 Jun 5.
6
Patient safety after implementation of a coproduced family centered communication programme: multicenter before and after intervention study.实施以家庭为中心的共同制定的沟通方案后患者的安全性:多中心干预前后研究。
BMJ. 2018 Dec 5;363:k4764. doi: 10.1136/bmj.k4764.
7
The AMBER care bundle for hospital inpatients with uncertain recovery nearing the end of life: the ImproveCare feasibility cluster RCT.AMBER 关怀包用于生命末期临近、康复情况不确定的住院患者:改善关怀可行性群组 RCT。
Health Technol Assess. 2019 Oct;23(55):1-150. doi: 10.3310/hta23550.
8
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
9
Attending rounds in the current era: what is and is not happening.当前时代的查房:正在发生和未发生的情况。
JAMA Intern Med. 2013 Jun 24;173(12):1084-9. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.6041.
10
Effect of patient-centred bedside rounds on hospitalised patients' decision control, activation and satisfaction with care.以患者为中心的床边查房对住院患者决策控制、参与度及护理满意度的影响。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2016 Dec;25(12):921-928. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2015-004561. Epub 2015 Dec 1.

本文引用的文献

1
Patients' Preference for Participation in Medical Decision-Making: Secondary Analysis of the BEDSIDE-OUTSIDE Trial.患者对参与医疗决策的偏好:BEDSIDE-OUTSIDE 试验的二次分析。
J Gen Intern Med. 2023 Apr;38(5):1180-1189. doi: 10.1007/s11606-022-07775-z. Epub 2022 Sep 9.
2
Presenting cases in front of patients: implications for a key medical education genre.在患者面前呈现病例:对医学教育主要类型的影响。
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2022 Aug;27(3):621-643. doi: 10.1007/s10459-022-10105-x. Epub 2022 Apr 2.
3
Perception of physicians and nursing staff members regarding outside versus bedside ward rounds: ancillary analysis of the randomised BEDSIDE-OUTSIDE trial.
医生和护理人员对床边与非床边查房的看法:随机对照 BEDSIDE-OUTSIDE 试验的辅助分析。
Swiss Med Wkly. 2022 Jan 19;152:w30112. doi: 10.4414/smw.2022.w30112. eCollection 2022 Jan 17.
4
Towards a medical school curriculum for uncertainty in clinical practice.迈向临床实践不确定性医学教育课程
Med Educ Online. 2021 Dec;26(1):1972762. doi: 10.1080/10872981.2021.1972762.
5
Effect of Bedside Compared With Outside the Room Patient Case Presentation on Patients' Knowledge About Their Medical Care : A Randomized, Controlled, Multicenter Trial.床边与房间外患者病例汇报对患者医疗知识的影响:一项随机、对照、多中心试验。
Ann Intern Med. 2021 Sep;174(9):1282-1292. doi: 10.7326/M21-0909. Epub 2021 Jun 29.
6
Illness uncertainty, coping, and quality of life among patients with prostate cancer.前列腺癌患者的疾病不确定感、应对方式和生活质量。
Psychooncology. 2020 Jun;29(6):1019-1025. doi: 10.1002/pon.5372. Epub 2020 Mar 13.
7
Patients experiences of bedside handover: findings from a meta-synthesis.患者床边交接班的体验:一项元整合分析的结果
Scand J Caring Sci. 2019 Sep;33(3):556-568. doi: 10.1111/scs.12673. Epub 2019 Mar 13.
8
Discussion of Potentially Sensitive Topics With Young People.与年轻人讨论潜在敏感话题。
Pediatrics. 2019 Feb;143(2). doi: 10.1542/peds.2018-1403. Epub 2019 Jan 16.
9
Managing diagnostic uncertainty in primary care: a systematic critical review.基层医疗中诊断不确定性的管理:系统批判性评价。
BMC Fam Pract. 2017 Aug 7;18(1):79. doi: 10.1186/s12875-017-0650-0.
10
Factors Affecting Quality of Life for Korean American Cancer Survivors: An Integrative Review.影响韩裔美国癌症幸存者生活质量的因素:一项综合综述。
Oncol Nurs Forum. 2016 May 1;43(3):E132-42. doi: 10.1188/16.ONF.E132-E142.