• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

与年轻人讨论潜在敏感话题。

Discussion of Potentially Sensitive Topics With Young People.

机构信息

Heilbrunn Department of Population and Family Health,

Department of Pediatrics, Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, New York.

出版信息

Pediatrics. 2019 Feb;143(2). doi: 10.1542/peds.2018-1403. Epub 2019 Jan 16.

DOI:10.1542/peds.2018-1403
PMID:30651304
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To identify modifiable factors that facilitate discussion of potentially sensitive topics between health care providers and young people at preventive service visits after Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act implementation.

METHODS

We used data from a national internet survey of adolescents and young adults (13-26 years old) in the United States. Questionnaire construction was guided by formative research and Fisher's Information-Motivation-Behavioral Skills model. Those who had seen a regular health care provider in the past 2 years were asked about 11 specific topics recommended by national medical guidelines. Four multivariable regression models were used to identify independent predictors of discussions of (1) tobacco use, (2) drug and/or alcohol use, (3) sexually transmitted infections or HIV, and (4) the number of topics discussed.

RESULTS

Fewer than half of young people reported having discussed 10 of 11 topics at their last visit. Predictors were similar across all 4 models. Factors independently associated with health discussions included the following: ever talked with a provider about confidentiality (4/4 models; adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 1.85-2.00), ever had private time with a provider (1 model; aOR = 1.50), use of health checklist and/or screening questionnaire at last visit (4 models; aOR = 1.78-1.96), and time spent with provider during last visit (4 models). Number of years that young men had seen their regular provider was significant in 1 model. Other independent factors were positive youth attitudes about discussing specific topics (3/3 models) and youth involvement in specific health risk behaviors (3/3 models).

CONCLUSIONS

Discussions about potentially sensitive topics between health care providers and young people are associated with modifiable factors of health care delivery, particularly provider explanations of confidentiality, use of screening and/or trigger questionnaires, and amount of time spent with their provider.

摘要

目的

在《患者保护与平价医疗法案》实施后,确定可促进医疗服务提供者与青少年在预防保健就诊期间讨论潜在敏感话题的可改变因素。

方法

我们使用了来自美国全国青少年和年轻人(13-26 岁)互联网调查的数据。调查问卷的构建以形成性研究和费舍尔信息-动机-行为技能模型为指导。那些在过去 2 年内看过常规医疗服务提供者的人被问及 11 项国家医疗指南推荐的特定话题。使用四个多变量回归模型来确定讨论以下四个话题的独立预测因素:(1)吸烟;(2)药物和/或酒精使用;(3)性传播感染或艾滋病毒;以及(4)讨论的话题数量。

结果

不到一半的年轻人报告在最近一次就诊中讨论了 11 个话题中的 10 个。在所有 4 个模型中,预测因素都是相似的。与健康讨论相关的独立因素包括以下内容:曾经与提供者讨论过保密性(4/4 个模型;调整后的优势比[aOR] = 1.85-2.00),曾经与提供者有过私人时间(1 个模型;aOR = 1.50),上次就诊时使用健康检查表和/或筛查问卷(4 个模型;aOR = 1.78-1.96),以及上次就诊时与提供者相处的时间(4 个模型)。在 1 个模型中,年轻男性看常规提供者的年数也是一个显著的独立因素。其他独立因素是青少年对讨论特定话题的积极态度(3/3 个模型)和青少年参与特定健康风险行为(3/3 个模型)。

结论

医疗服务提供者与年轻人之间关于潜在敏感话题的讨论与医疗服务提供的可改变因素相关,特别是提供者对保密性的解释、使用筛查和/或触发问卷以及与提供者相处的时间。

相似文献

1
Discussion of Potentially Sensitive Topics With Young People.与年轻人讨论潜在敏感话题。
Pediatrics. 2019 Feb;143(2). doi: 10.1542/peds.2018-1403. Epub 2019 Jan 16.
2
Confidentiality Discussions and Private Time With a Health-Care Provider for Youth, United States, 2016.青少年与医疗保健提供者的保密性讨论和私人时间,美国,2016 年。
J Adolesc Health. 2019 Mar;64(3):311-318. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2018.10.301. Epub 2019 Jan 9.
3
The Unmet Need for Discussions Between Health Care Providers and Adolescents and Young Adults.卫生保健提供者与青少年和青年之间未满足的讨论需求。
J Adolesc Health. 2020 Aug;67(2):262-269. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2020.01.019. Epub 2020 Mar 10.
4
Correlates of Sexual and Reproductive Health Discussions During Preventive Visits: Findings From a National Sample of U.S. Adolescents.预防就诊期间性与生殖健康讨论的相关因素:来自美国青少年全国样本的研究结果。
J Adolesc Health. 2022 Mar;70(3):421-428. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2021.10.013. Epub 2021 Nov 24.
5
Sexual and Reproductive Health Discussions During Preventive Visits.预防性就诊期间的性与生殖健康讨论。
Pediatrics. 2021 Aug;148(2). doi: 10.1542/peds.2020-049411. Epub 2021 Jul 12.
6
Discussion of sensitive health topics with youth during primary care visits: relationship to youth perceptions of care.在初级保健就诊期间与青少年讨论敏感健康话题:与青少年对医疗护理的认知的关系
J Adolesc Health. 2009 Jan;44(1):48-54. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2008.06.018. Epub 2008 Oct 25.
7
Assessing health system provision of adolescent preventive services: the Young Adult Health Care Survey.评估卫生系统对青少年预防服务的提供情况:青年医疗保健调查
Med Care. 2001 May;39(5):478-90. doi: 10.1097/00005650-200105000-00008.
8
Clinical conversations about health: the impact of confidentiality in preventive adolescent care.关于健康的临床对话:预防青少年保健中保密性的影响。
J Adolesc Health. 2014 Nov;55(5):672-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2014.05.016. Epub 2014 Jul 16.
9
Health care use amongst online buyers of medications and vitamins.药品和维生素在线购买者的医疗保健使用情况。
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2015 Nov-Dec;11(6):844-58. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2015.01.001. Epub 2015 Jan 9.
10
Young Men's Disclosure of Same Sex Behaviors to Healthcare Providers and the Impact on Health: Results from a US National Sample of Young Men Who Have Sex with Men.年轻男性向医疗服务提供者披露同性行为及其对健康的影响:来自美国男男性行为者全国样本的结果。
AIDS Patient Care STDS. 2017 Aug;31(8):342-347. doi: 10.1089/apc.2017.0011.

引用本文的文献

1
An Innovative Youth-Friendly Electronic Questionnaire to Identify Mental, Sexual and Reproductive Health Risks: A Validation Study of the Total Teen Assessment.一种创新的青少年友好型电子问卷,用于识别心理、性与生殖健康风险:《青少年全面评估》的验证研究
Health Expect. 2025 Aug;28(4):e70313. doi: 10.1111/hex.70313.
2
Adolescent Perceptions of HIV Testing Access and Utilization Across Two States with Varying Laws Regulating Minors' Access to Confidential Sexual Health Services: A Qualitative Study in Connecticut and New Jersey.青少年对两个州艾滋病毒检测可及性和利用率的看法,这两个州对未成年人获得保密性健康服务有不同法律规定:康涅狄格州和新泽西州的定性研究
AIDS Behav. 2025 Apr 24. doi: 10.1007/s10461-025-04738-3.
3
Confidentiality-promoting state laws and sex differences in HIV testing among sexually experienced U.S. high school students.
促进保密的州法律与美国有性经历的高中生艾滋病毒检测中的性别差异。
AIDS Care. 2025 Jun;37(6):901-913. doi: 10.1080/09540121.2025.2473945. Epub 2025 Mar 6.
4
Associations Between State Laws Regulating Minors' Access to Confidential Sexual Health Services and Lifetime HIV Testing Among U.S. Male High School Students.美国男性高中生中,规范未成年人获取保密性健康服务的州法律与终身艾滋病毒检测之间的关联。
AIDS Behav. 2025 Mar;29(3):906-918. doi: 10.1007/s10461-024-04574-x. Epub 2024 Dec 14.
5
Adolescent Healthcare Access: A Qualitative Study of Provider Perspectives.青少年保健服务获取情况:提供者视角的定性研究。
J Prim Care Community Health. 2024 Jan-Dec;15:21501319241234586. doi: 10.1177/21501319241234586.
6
Occurrence of sensitive topics during ward round: an ancillary analysis of the BEDSIDE-OUTSIDE trial.在病房查房时出现敏感话题:BEDSIDE-OUTSIDE 试验的辅助分析。
BMJ Open. 2023 Sep 21;13(9):e073584. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-073584.
7
Association of Adolescents' Body Mass Index Classification With Preventive Clinical Care Receipt.青少年体重指数分类与接受预防临床护理的关联。
J Adolesc Health. 2023 Dec;73(6):1046-1052. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2023.06.029. Epub 2023 Sep 10.
8
A qualitative assessment of adolescent perspectives on patient education in the outpatient setting.对青少年在门诊环境中对患者教育看法的定性评估。
PEC Innov. 2022 Dec 9;2:100117. doi: 10.1016/j.pecinn.2022.100117. eCollection 2023 Dec.
9
Provider Facilitation of Parent-Adolescent Health Communication: Findings From a National Survey.提供者促进父母-青少年健康沟通:一项全国性调查的结果。
J Pediatr Health Care. 2023 May-Jun;37(3):253-261. doi: 10.1016/j.pedhc.2022.11.003. Epub 2023 Jan 7.
10
Confidentiality matters! Adolescent males' views of primary care in relation to psychosocial health: a structural equation modelling approach.保密很重要!青少年男性对初级保健与心理社会健康关系的看法:结构方程建模方法。
Scand J Prim Health Care. 2022 Dec;40(4):438-449. doi: 10.1080/02813432.2022.2144999. Epub 2022 Dec 2.