• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

刻意练习诊断临床推理会降低预科医学生的诊断表现,并改善其诊断论证。

Deliberate practice of diagnostic clinical reasoning reveals low performance and improvement of diagnostic justification in pre-clerkship students.

机构信息

Erasmus Medical Center, Institute of Medical Education Research Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.

Department of Critical Care, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.

出版信息

BMC Med Educ. 2023 Sep 21;23(1):684. doi: 10.1186/s12909-023-04541-5.

DOI:10.1186/s12909-023-04541-5
PMID:37735677
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10515060/
Abstract

PURPOSE

Diagnostic errors are a large burden on patient safety and improving clinical reasoning (CR) education could contribute to reducing these errors. To this end, calls have been made to implement CR training as early as the first year of medical school. However, much is still unknown about pre-clerkship students' reasoning processes. The current study aimed to observe how pre-clerkship students use clinical information during the diagnostic process.

METHODS

In a prospective observational study, pre-clerkship medical students completed 10-11 self-directed online simulated CR diagnostic cases. CR skills assessed included: creation of the differential diagnosis (Ddx), diagnostic justification (DxJ), ordering investigations, and identifying the most probable diagnosis. Student performances were compared to expert-created scorecards and students received detailed individualized formative feedback for every case.

RESULTS

121 of 133 (91%) first- and second-year medical students consented to the research project. Students scored much lower for DxJ compared to scores obtained for creation of the Ddx, ordering tests, and identifying the correct diagnosis, (30-48% lower, p < 0.001). Specifically, students underutilized physical exam data (p < 0.001) and underutilized data that decreased the probability of incorrect diagnoses (p < 0.001). We observed that DxJ scores increased 40% after 10-11 practice cases (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

We implemented deliberate practice with formative feedback for CR starting in the first year of medical school. Students underperformed in DxJ, particularly with analyzing the physical exam data and pertinent negative data. We observed significant improvement in DxJ performance with increased practice.

摘要

目的

诊断错误给患者安全带来了巨大负担,而改善临床推理(CR)教育则有助于减少这些错误。为此,人们呼吁在医学院的第一年就开始进行 CR 培训。然而,关于预科医学生的推理过程,我们还有很多不了解的地方。本研究旨在观察预科医学生在诊断过程中如何使用临床信息。

方法

在一项前瞻性观察性研究中,预科医学生完成了 10-11 个自我指导的在线模拟 CR 诊断病例。评估的 CR 技能包括:建立鉴别诊断(Ddx)、诊断证明(DxJ)、安排检查以及确定最可能的诊断。学生的表现与专家创建的记分卡进行了比较,每位学生都收到了每一个案例的详细个性化形成性反馈。

结果

共有 133 名第一和第二年的医学生中的 121 名同意参与该研究项目。与建立 Ddx、安排检查和确定正确诊断相比,学生在 DxJ 上的得分要低得多(低 30-48%,p<0.001)。具体来说,学生对体格检查数据的利用不足(p<0.001),对降低错误诊断概率的数据的利用不足(p<0.001)。我们观察到,在进行了 10-11 个练习案例后,DxJ 分数提高了 40%(p<0.001)。

结论

我们从医学院第一年开始就采用了有形成性反馈的刻意练习来进行 CR 培训。学生在 DxJ 方面表现不佳,尤其是在分析体格检查数据和相关的阴性数据方面。随着练习的增加,我们观察到 DxJ 表现有显著的提高。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/71ec/10515060/b6de6e97b3b5/12909_2023_4541_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/71ec/10515060/fd36cfd6f60d/12909_2023_4541_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/71ec/10515060/fa177d043f7e/12909_2023_4541_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/71ec/10515060/7f18e4bd4bbd/12909_2023_4541_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/71ec/10515060/29a01f065ccb/12909_2023_4541_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/71ec/10515060/2f40313029a5/12909_2023_4541_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/71ec/10515060/b6de6e97b3b5/12909_2023_4541_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/71ec/10515060/fd36cfd6f60d/12909_2023_4541_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/71ec/10515060/fa177d043f7e/12909_2023_4541_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/71ec/10515060/7f18e4bd4bbd/12909_2023_4541_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/71ec/10515060/29a01f065ccb/12909_2023_4541_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/71ec/10515060/2f40313029a5/12909_2023_4541_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/71ec/10515060/b6de6e97b3b5/12909_2023_4541_Fig6_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Deliberate practice of diagnostic clinical reasoning reveals low performance and improvement of diagnostic justification in pre-clerkship students.刻意练习诊断临床推理会降低预科医学生的诊断表现,并改善其诊断论证。
BMC Med Educ. 2023 Sep 21;23(1):684. doi: 10.1186/s12909-023-04541-5.
2
Gathering Validity Evidence on an Internal Medicine Clerkship Multistep Exam to Assess Medical Student Analytic Ability.收集关于内科实习多步骤考试的效度证据以评估医学生的分析能力。
Teach Learn Med. 2021 Jan-Mar;33(1):28-35. doi: 10.1080/10401334.2020.1749635. Epub 2020 Apr 11.
3
Development and Pilot Testing of a Data-Rich Clinical Reasoning Training and Assessment Tool.开发和初步测试一种数据丰富的临床推理培训和评估工具。
Acad Med. 2022 Oct 1;97(10):1484-1488. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000004758. Epub 2022 May 24.
4
Association of Simulation Participation With Diagnostic Reasoning Scores in Preclinical Students.模拟参与与临床前学生诊断推理成绩的关联。
Simul Healthc. 2022 Feb 1;17(1):35-41. doi: 10.1097/SIH.0000000000000589.
5
Examining the diagnostic justification abilities of fourth-year medical students.考察四年级医学生的诊断验证能力。
Acad Med. 2012 Aug;87(8):1008-14. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e31825cfcff.
6
The IDEA Assessment Tool: Assessing the Reporting, Diagnostic Reasoning, and Decision-Making Skills Demonstrated in Medical Students' Hospital Admission Notes.IDEA评估工具:评估医学生住院病历中展示的报告、诊断推理和决策技能。
Teach Learn Med. 2015;27(2):163-73. doi: 10.1080/10401334.2015.1011654.
7
Promoting clinical reasoning with meta-memory techniques to teach broad differential diagnosis generation in a pediatric core clerkship.运用元记忆技巧促进临床推理,以在儿科核心实习中教授广泛的鉴别诊断生成。
Diagnosis (Berl). 2023 Jul 13;10(3):242-248. doi: 10.1515/dx-2023-0038. eCollection 2023 Aug 1.
8
Teaching and assessment of clinical diagnostic reasoning in medical students.医学学生临床诊断推理的教学与评估。
Med Teach. 2022 Jun;44(6):650-656. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2021.2017869. Epub 2022 Jan 18.
9
Comparative effectiveness study of flipped classroom versus online-only instruction of clinical reasoning for medical students.比较翻转课堂与在线教学对医学生临床推理教学效果的研究。
Med Educ Online. 2023 Dec;28(1):2142358. doi: 10.1080/10872981.2022.2142358.
10
Improving clerkship preparedness: a hospital medicine elective for pre-clerkship students.提高实习准备:为实习前学生开设医院医学选修课。
Med Educ Online. 2017;22(1):1307082. doi: 10.1080/10872981.2017.1307082.

引用本文的文献

1
Undergraduate medical students' perceptions and perspectives on their clinical reasoning learning experiences.本科医学生对其临床推理学习经历的认知与看法。
Sci Rep. 2025 Feb 20;15(1):6229. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-90656-2.

本文引用的文献

1
Development and Pilot Testing of a Data-Rich Clinical Reasoning Training and Assessment Tool.开发和初步测试一种数据丰富的临床推理培训和评估工具。
Acad Med. 2022 Oct 1;97(10):1484-1488. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000004758. Epub 2022 May 24.
2
Association of Simulation Participation With Diagnostic Reasoning Scores in Preclinical Students.模拟参与与临床前学生诊断推理成绩的关联。
Simul Healthc. 2022 Feb 1;17(1):35-41. doi: 10.1097/SIH.0000000000000589.
3
Consensus statement on the content of clinical reasoning curricula in undergraduate medical education.
关于本科医学教育中临床推理课程内容的共识声明。
Med Teach. 2021 Feb;43(2):152-159. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2020.1842343. Epub 2020 Nov 18.
4
Immunising' physicians against availability bias in diagnostic reasoning: a randomised controlled experiment.免疫医生对诊断推理中可得性偏差:一项随机对照试验。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2020 Jul;29(7):550-559. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2019-010079. Epub 2020 Jan 27.
5
Clinical Reasoning as a Core Competency.临床推理作为一项核心能力。
Acad Med. 2020 Aug;95(8):1166-1171. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000003027.
6
Clinical Reasoning Assessment Methods: A Scoping Review and Practical Guidance.临床推理评估方法:范围综述与实践指导。
Acad Med. 2019 Jun;94(6):902-912. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000002618.
7
Twelve Tips for Developing Clinical Reasoning Skills in the Pre-Clinical and Clinical Stages of Medical School.医学生临床前和临床阶段临床推理技能培养的 12 个技巧。
Med Teach. 2019 Sep;41(9):1007-1011. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2018.1502418. Epub 2018 Oct 9.
8
Uncovering the relation between clinical reasoning and diagnostic accuracy - An analysis of learner's clinical reasoning processes in virtual patients.揭示临床推理与诊断准确性之间的关系——对学习者在虚拟患者中临床推理过程的分析。
PLoS One. 2018 Oct 4;13(10):e0204900. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0204900. eCollection 2018.
9
Improving diagnosis by improving education: a policy brief on education in healthcare professions.通过加强教育改善诊断:一份关于医疗保健专业教育的政策简报。
Diagnosis (Berl). 2018 Sep 25;5(3):107-118. doi: 10.1515/dx-2018-0033.
10
The 3 faces of clinical reasoning: Epistemological explorations of disparate error reduction strategies.临床推理的三个方面:对不同错误减少策略的认识论探索。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2018 Jun;24(3):666-673. doi: 10.1111/jep.12907. Epub 2018 Mar 13.