Cordeiro R S, Martins M A, Silva P M, Faria Neto H C, Castanheira J R, Vargaftig B B
Life Sci. 1986 Nov 17;39(20):1871-8. doi: 10.1016/0024-3205(86)90297-3.
The intraplantar injection of PAF-acether (PAF), induced acute oedema in the rat paw, and desensitized it to subsequent challenges with the same agonist, but not to serotonin. The desensitization was maximal (up to 80% of initial response) after seven consecutive daily injections. In this condition, PAF-induced oedema of the contralateral paw was maintained. The analogue 2-methyl carbamate-PAF (2MC-PAF) was more effective than PAF as a desensitizing agent. Furthermore, the PAF-desensitized paw was refractory to challenges with 2-MC and vice-versa. PAF-acether, but not serotonin-induced rat paw oedema was inhibited by previous intravenous injection of PAF. Intravenous injections of serotonin were also effective in inhibiting selectively serotonin-induced paw oedema, but it was not possible to induce desensitization by repeated intraplantar injections of serotonin. Desensitization to PAF or the pre-treatment with the PAF antagonist BN 52021 did not block the edematogenic response induced by carrageenan.
足底注射血小板活化因子(PAF)可诱导大鼠爪部急性水肿,并使其对随后相同激动剂的刺激产生脱敏作用,但对5-羟色胺无此作用。连续每日注射七次后,脱敏作用达到最大程度(高达初始反应的80%)。在此情况下,对侧爪部由PAF诱导的水肿依然存在。类似物2-甲基氨基甲酸酯-PAF(2MC-PAF)作为脱敏剂比PAF更有效。此外,对PAF脱敏的爪部对2-MC的刺激无反应,反之亦然。预先静脉注射PAF可抑制PAF诱导的大鼠爪部水肿,但不能抑制5-羟色胺诱导的水肿。静脉注射5-羟色胺也能有效选择性地抑制5-羟色胺诱导的爪部水肿,但反复足底注射5-羟色胺无法诱导脱敏作用。对PAF的脱敏或用PAF拮抗剂BN 52021进行预处理,均不能阻断角叉菜胶诱导的致水肿反应。