• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

超大断面隧道HB法与CD法施工参数评价:工程实例研究

Evaluating construction parameters of HB and CD methods for super large section tunnel: a case study.

作者信息

Zhu Ting, Liu Yuanming

机构信息

Faculty of Civil Engineering, Guizhou University, Guiyang, 550025, China.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2023 Sep 22;13(1):15812. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-42458-7.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-023-42458-7
PMID:37737477
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10517136/
Abstract

The double sidewall guide pit and centre cross diagram (CRD) methods are often used for the construction of large-section tunnels through water-rich fault fracture zones due to their long construction time and high construction cost. To shorten the construction period and save costs, the top heading and benching method (HB) and centre diaphragm (CD) can be chosen for construction. The construction parameters of the step and CD methods are optimized to ensure the surrounding rock stability and tunnel safety. By relying on the Tongzi Tunnel, we simulate the excavation of different step heights in the construction of the top heading and benching method (HB) and CD methods through numerical simulation, the laws of tunnel vault settlement, and changes in the surrounding rock stress, initial support axial force, bending moment and safety factor. The study shows that as the height of the upper step increases, the settlement of the vault and the convergence of the periphery increase, the initial support safety factor decreases, and the plastic zone of the surrounding rock increases at 30 m from the target face. The step height for the top heading and benching method (HB) of construction is optimized as follows. The ratios of the upper, middle and lower step heights are 0.45H, 0.35H and 0.2H, respectively. The CD method construction step height is optimized to the left (right) upper and left (right) lower step height ratios of 0.5H and 0.5H, respectively.

摘要

双侧墙导坑法和中隔壁法(CRD法)由于施工工期长、施工成本高,常用于穿越富水断层破碎带的大断面隧道施工。为缩短工期、节约成本,可选用正台阶法(HB法)和中隔墙法(CD法)进行施工。对台阶法和CD法的施工参数进行优化,以确保围岩稳定性和隧道安全性。依托桐梓隧道,通过数值模拟对正台阶法(HB法)和CD法施工中不同台阶高度的开挖、隧道拱顶沉降规律以及围岩应力、初期支护轴力、弯矩和安全系数的变化进行模拟。研究表明,随着上台阶高度的增加,距掌子面30m处拱顶沉降和周边收敛增大,初期支护安全系数降低,围岩塑性区增大。正台阶法(HB法)施工的台阶高度优化如下:上、中、下台阶高度比分别为0.45H、0.35H和0.2H。CD法施工台阶高度优化为左(右)上、左(右)下台阶高度比分别为0.5H和0.5H。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3f4e/10517136/8af24ee9a43d/41598_2023_42458_Fig11_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3f4e/10517136/e4fbfcc9f966/41598_2023_42458_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3f4e/10517136/7ea02d1c4421/41598_2023_42458_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3f4e/10517136/7f566fe7ea9b/41598_2023_42458_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3f4e/10517136/ebc38ffad8da/41598_2023_42458_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3f4e/10517136/9e537d0ccdf3/41598_2023_42458_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3f4e/10517136/8dcaf0dfc264/41598_2023_42458_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3f4e/10517136/5599c61dc507/41598_2023_42458_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3f4e/10517136/4d3c35dd95d5/41598_2023_42458_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3f4e/10517136/58af896b6fdd/41598_2023_42458_Fig9_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3f4e/10517136/ce62a30d1a37/41598_2023_42458_Fig10_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3f4e/10517136/8af24ee9a43d/41598_2023_42458_Fig11_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3f4e/10517136/e4fbfcc9f966/41598_2023_42458_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3f4e/10517136/7ea02d1c4421/41598_2023_42458_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3f4e/10517136/7f566fe7ea9b/41598_2023_42458_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3f4e/10517136/ebc38ffad8da/41598_2023_42458_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3f4e/10517136/9e537d0ccdf3/41598_2023_42458_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3f4e/10517136/8dcaf0dfc264/41598_2023_42458_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3f4e/10517136/5599c61dc507/41598_2023_42458_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3f4e/10517136/4d3c35dd95d5/41598_2023_42458_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3f4e/10517136/58af896b6fdd/41598_2023_42458_Fig9_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3f4e/10517136/ce62a30d1a37/41598_2023_42458_Fig10_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3f4e/10517136/8af24ee9a43d/41598_2023_42458_Fig11_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Evaluating construction parameters of HB and CD methods for super large section tunnel: a case study.超大断面隧道HB法与CD法施工参数评价:工程实例研究
Sci Rep. 2023 Sep 22;13(1):15812. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-42458-7.
2
Excavation method optimization and mechanical responses investigating of a shallow buried super large section tunnels: a case study in Zhejiang.浅埋超大断面隧道开挖方法优化及力学响应研究:以浙江为例
Sci Rep. 2024 Mar 15;14(1):6281. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-56982-7.
3
Support mechanical response analysis and surrounding rock pressure calculation method for a shallow buried super large section tunnel in weak surrounding rock.软弱围岩浅埋超大断面隧道支护力学响应分析及围岩压力计算方法
Sci Rep. 2024 Jun 12;14(1):13593. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-64522-6.
4
Numerical analysis and application of the construction method for the small interval tunnel in the turn line of metro.地铁折返线小间距隧道施工方法的数值分析与应用
Sci Prog. 2020 Jul-Sep;103(3):36850420932067. doi: 10.1177/0036850420932067.
5
Railway track settlement patterns and control measures for multi-tunnel construction underneath a station track group: a case study.车站轨道群下方多隧道施工的轨道沉降模式及控制措施:案例研究
Sci Rep. 2024 Jun 24;14(1):14474. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-64916-6.
6
Stability Analysis and Construction Parameter Optimization of Tunnels in the Fractured Zone of Faults.断层破碎带中隧道的稳定性分析与施工参数优化
Int J Anal Chem. 2022 Aug 31;2022:2211499. doi: 10.1155/2022/2211499. eCollection 2022.
7
Experimental study on the damage performance and forced response of concrete lining in fault-crossing tunnel.穿越断层隧道混凝土衬砌损伤性能与强迫响应试验研究
Sci Rep. 2024 Jan 24;14(1):2120. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-52318-7.
8
Analysis for bearing performance and construction mechanical behavior of supporting structure for the large cross-section tunnel by half bench CD method.采用 CD 法分部开挖施工的大断面隧道支护结构受力与变形分析
PLoS One. 2021 Aug 6;16(8):e0255511. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0255511. eCollection 2021.
9
The use of surrounding rock loosening circle theory combined with elastic-plastic mechanics calculation method and depth learning in roadway support.围岩松动圈理论在巷道支护中结合弹性-塑性力学计算方法和深度学习的应用。
PLoS One. 2020 Jul 15;15(7):e0234071. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0234071. eCollection 2020.
10
Construction practice of water conveyance tunnel among complex geotechnical conditions: a case study.复杂岩土条件下输水隧洞的施工实践:案例研究
Sci Rep. 2023 Sep 12;13(1):15037. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-42192-0.

引用本文的文献

1
Mechanical response characteristics of large-span double-arch tunnel construction and eccentric loading effect on the partition wall.大跨双连拱隧道施工力学响应特性及偏压对中隔墙的影响
Sci Rep. 2025 Jun 4;15(1):19642. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-04443-0.
2
Mechanical model and constructional behavior for center diaphragm in shallow tunnel.浅埋隧道中墙的力学模型与施工行为
Sci Rep. 2025 May 28;15(1):18608. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-03078-5.
3
Excavation method optimization and mechanical responses investigating of a shallow buried super large section tunnels: a case study in Zhejiang.

本文引用的文献

1
Effects of different empirical tunnel design approaches on rock mass behaviour during tunnel widening.不同经验性隧道设计方法对隧道扩挖过程中岩体行为的影响。
Heliyon. 2019 Dec 18;5(12):e02944. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e02944. eCollection 2019 Dec.
浅埋超大断面隧道开挖方法优化及力学响应研究:以浙江为例
Sci Rep. 2024 Mar 15;14(1):6281. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-56982-7.