Suppr超能文献

通过台式核磁共振光谱进行反应监测:在线停流和连续流采样方法的实际比较。

Reaction monitoring via benchtop nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy: A practical comparison of on-line stopped-flow and continuous-flow sampling methods.

作者信息

Maschmeyer Tristan, Russell David J, Napolitano José G, Hein Jason E

机构信息

Department of Chemistry, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.

Small Molecule Pharmaceutical Sciences, Genentech Inc., South San Francisco, California, USA.

出版信息

Magn Reson Chem. 2024 Apr;62(4):310-322. doi: 10.1002/mrc.5395. Epub 2023 Sep 22.

Abstract

The ability for nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy to provide quantitative, structurally rich information makes this spectroscopic technique an attractive reaction monitoring tool. The practicality of NMR for this type of analysis has only increased in the recent years with the influx of commercially available benchtop NMR instruments and compatible flow systems. In this study, we aim to compare F NMR reaction profiles acquired under both on-line continuous-flow and stopped-flow sampling methods, with modern benchtop NMR instrumentation, and two reaction systems: a homogeneous imination reaction and a biphasic activation of a carboxylic acid to acyl fluoride. Reaction trends with higher data density can be acquired with on-line continuous-flow analyses, and this work highlights that representative reaction trends can be acquired without any correction when monitoring resonances with a shorter spin-lattice relaxation time (T), and with the used flow conditions. On-line stopped-flow analyses resulted in representative reaction trends in all cases, including the monitoring of resonances with a long T, without the need of any correction factors. The benefit of easier data analysis, however, comes with the cost of time, as the fresh reaction solution must be flowed into the NMR system, halted, and time must be provided for spins to become polarized in the instrument's external magnetic field prior to spectral measurement. Results for one of the reactions were additionally compared with the use of a high-field NMR.

摘要

核磁共振(NMR)光谱能够提供定量的、结构丰富的信息,这使得该光谱技术成为一种有吸引力的反应监测工具。近年来,随着商用台式NMR仪器和兼容流动系统的大量涌入,NMR用于此类分析的实用性不断提高。在本研究中,我们旨在比较在在线连续流动和停流采样方法下,使用现代台式NMR仪器以及两个反应系统(一个均相亚胺化反应和一个羧酸双相活化生成酰氟的反应)所获得的¹⁹F NMR反应谱。在线连续流动分析可以获得数据密度更高的反应趋势,并且这项工作强调,在监测具有较短自旋晶格弛豫时间(T₁)的共振以及使用的流动条件下,无需任何校正即可获得代表性的反应趋势。在线停流分析在所有情况下都能得到代表性的反应趋势,包括监测具有较长T₁的共振,无需任何校正因子。然而,更简便的数据分析的好处是以时间为代价的,因为必须将新鲜的反应溶液流入NMR系统,使其停止流动,并且在进行光谱测量之前,必须留出时间让自旋在仪器的外部磁场中极化。另外,还将其中一个反应的结果与使用高场NMR的结果进行了比较。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验