• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

指定用于抑郁和焦虑的数字治疗工具的疗效:回顾性、2 队列、真实世界分析。

Specifying the Efficacy of Digital Therapeutic Tools for Depression and Anxiety: Retrospective, 2-Cohort, Real-World Analysis.

机构信息

Dario Health, Caesarea, Israel.

Joslin Diabetes Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States.

出版信息

J Med Internet Res. 2023 Sep 22;25:e47350. doi: 10.2196/47350.

DOI:10.2196/47350
PMID:37738076
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10559191/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Depression and anxiety are the main sources of work and social disabilities as well as health-related problems around the world. Digital therapeutic solutions using cognitive behavioral therapy have demonstrated efficacy in depression and anxiety. A common goal of digital health apps is to increase user digital engagement to improve outcomes. However, there is a limited understanding of the association between digital platform components and clinical outcomes.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study is to investigate the contribution of specific digital engagement tools to mental health conditions. We hypothesized that participation in coaching sessions and breathing exercises would be associated with a reduction in depression and anxiety.

METHODS

Depression and general anxiety symptoms were evaluated in real-world data cohorts using the digital health platform for digital intervention and monitoring change. This retrospective real-world analysis of users on a mobile platform-based treatment followed two cohorts of people: (1) users who started with moderate levels of depression and completed at least 2 depression assessments (n=519) and (2) users who started with moderate levels of anxiety and completed at least 2 anxiety assessments (n=474). Levels of depression (Patient Health Questionnaire-9) and anxiety (Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7) were tracked throughout the first 16 weeks. A piecewise mixed-effects model was applied to model the trajectories of the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 and the Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 mean scores in 2 segments (1-6 weeks and 7-16 weeks). Finally, simple slope analysis was used for the interpretation of the interactions probing the moderators: coaching sessions and breathing exercises in both depression and anxiety cohorts.

RESULTS

Analysis revealed a significant decrease in depression symptoms (β=-.37, 95% CI -0.46 to 0.28; P≤.001) during the period of weeks 1-6 of app use, which was maintained during the period of 7-16 weeks. Coach interaction significantly moderated the reduction in depression symptoms during the period of weeks 1-6 (β=-.03, 95% CI -0.05 to -0.001; P=.02). A significant decrease in anxiety symptoms (β=-.41, 95% CI -0.50 to -0.33; P≤.001) was revealed during the period of 1-6 weeks, which was maintained during the period of 7-16 weeks. Breathing exercises significantly moderated the reduction in anxiety symptoms during the period of 1-6 weeks (β=-.07, 95% CI -0.14 to -0.01; P=.04).

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrated general improvement followed by a period of stability of depression and anxiety symptoms associated with cognitive behavioral therapy-based digital intervention. Interestingly, engagement with a coaching session but not a breathing exercise was associated with a reduction in depression symptoms. Moreover, breathing exercise but not engagement with a coaching session was associated with a reduction of anxiety symptoms. These findings emphasize the importance of using a personalized approach to behavioral health during digital health interventions.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e6b6/10559191/73bf5f15e848/jmir_v25i1e47350_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e6b6/10559191/66d338413127/jmir_v25i1e47350_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e6b6/10559191/73bf5f15e848/jmir_v25i1e47350_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e6b6/10559191/66d338413127/jmir_v25i1e47350_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e6b6/10559191/73bf5f15e848/jmir_v25i1e47350_fig2.jpg
摘要

背景

抑郁和焦虑是全世界工作和社交障碍以及与健康相关问题的主要来源。使用认知行为疗法的数字治疗解决方案已证明对抑郁和焦虑有效。数字健康应用程序的共同目标是提高用户的数字参与度以改善结果。然而,对于数字平台组件与临床结果之间的关联,人们的理解有限。

目的

本研究旨在调查特定数字参与工具对心理健康状况的贡献。我们假设,参加辅导课程和呼吸练习将与抑郁和焦虑的减轻有关。

方法

使用数字健康平台进行数字干预和监测变化,在真实世界数据队列中评估抑郁和一般焦虑症状。对基于移动平台的治疗的用户进行了这一回顾性真实世界分析,研究了两个队列:(1)开始时有中度抑郁并完成至少 2 次抑郁评估的用户(n=519);(2)开始时有中度焦虑并完成至少 2 次焦虑评估的用户(n=474)。在最初的 16 周内,跟踪了抑郁(患者健康问卷-9)和焦虑(广泛性焦虑障碍-7)的水平。应用分段混合效应模型对 2 个时间段(1-6 周和 7-16 周)的患者健康问卷-9和广泛性焦虑障碍-7平均分数的轨迹进行建模。最后,对教练课程和呼吸练习在抑郁和焦虑队列中的交互作用进行简单斜率分析,以解释交互作用。

结果

分析显示,在使用应用程序的第 1-6 周期间,抑郁症状显著下降(β=-.37,95%置信区间(CI):-0.46 至 0.28;P≤.001),在第 7-16 周期间保持不变。教练互动显著调节了第 1-6 周期间抑郁症状的减轻(β=-.03,95%CI:-0.05 至-0.001;P=.02)。在第 1-6 周期间,焦虑症状显著下降(β=-.41,95%CI:-0.50 至-0.33;P≤.001),在第 7-16 周期间保持不变。呼吸练习显著调节了第 1-6 周期间焦虑症状的减轻(β=-.07,95%CI:-0.14 至-0.01;P=.04)。

结论

本研究表明,与基于认知行为疗法的数字干预相关的抑郁和焦虑症状通常会有所改善,然后是稳定期。有趣的是,与辅导课程的参与而不是呼吸练习的参与与抑郁症状的减轻有关。此外,呼吸练习而不是与辅导课程的参与与焦虑症状的减轻有关。这些发现强调了在数字健康干预期间使用个性化方法进行行为健康的重要性。

相似文献

1
Specifying the Efficacy of Digital Therapeutic Tools for Depression and Anxiety: Retrospective, 2-Cohort, Real-World Analysis.指定用于抑郁和焦虑的数字治疗工具的疗效:回顾性、2 队列、真实世界分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Sep 22;25:e47350. doi: 10.2196/47350.
2
Association of Digital Engagement With Relaxation Tools and Stress Level Reduction: Retrospective Cohort Study.数字参与与放松工具及压力水平降低的关联:回顾性队列研究。
JMIR Form Res. 2024 Mar 19;8:e50506. doi: 10.2196/50506.
3
Evaluation of a Commercial Mobile Health App for Depression and Anxiety (AbleTo Digital+): Retrospective Cohort Study.一款用于治疗抑郁和焦虑的商业移动健康应用程序(AbleTo Digital+)的评估:回顾性队列研究。
JMIR Form Res. 2021 Sep 21;5(9):e27570. doi: 10.2196/27570.
4
Engagement, Acceptability, and Effectiveness of the Self-Care and Coach-Supported Versions of the Vira Digital Behavior Change Platform Among Young Adults at Risk for Depression and Obesity: Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.Vira 数字行为改变平台的自我护理和教练支持版本在有抑郁和肥胖风险的年轻成年人中的参与度、可接受性和有效性: 试点随机对照试验。
JMIR Ment Health. 2024 Sep 19;11:e51366. doi: 10.2196/51366.
5
Outcomes of a Blended Care Coaching Program for Clients Presenting With Moderate Levels of Anxiety and Depression: Pragmatic Retrospective Study.针对中度焦虑和抑郁患者的混合式护理指导计划的效果:实用回顾性研究
JMIR Ment Health. 2021 Oct 21;8(10):e32100. doi: 10.2196/32100.
6
Digital Cognitive Behavior Therapy Intervention for Depression and Anxiety: Retrospective Study.用于治疗抑郁和焦虑的数字认知行为疗法干预:回顾性研究
JMIR Ment Health. 2020 Aug 26;7(8):e21304. doi: 10.2196/21304.
7
Blended Care-Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Depression and Anxiety in Real-World Settings: Pragmatic Retrospective Study.现实环境中针对抑郁和焦虑的混合式护理-认知行为疗法:实用回顾性研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Jul 6;22(7):e18723. doi: 10.2196/18723.
8
Trajectories of Symptoms in Digital Interventions for Depression and Anxiety Using Routine Outcome Monitoring Data: Secondary Analysis Study.使用常规结果监测数据的抑郁和焦虑数字干预措施中症状的轨迹:二次分析研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2023 Jul 12;11:e41815. doi: 10.2196/41815.
9
Feasibility and Acceptability of a Mobile App-Based TEAM-CBT (Testing Empathy Assessment Methods-Cognitive Behavioral Therapy) Intervention (Feeling Good) for Depression: Secondary Data Analysis.基于移动应用的 TEAM-CBT(测试共情评估方法-认知行为疗法)干预(感觉良好)治疗抑郁症的可行性和可接受性:二次数据分析。
JMIR Ment Health. 2024 May 10;11:e52369. doi: 10.2196/52369.
10
Coached Mobile App Platform for the Treatment of Depression and Anxiety Among Primary Care Patients: A Randomized Clinical Trial.教练式移动应用平台治疗初级保健患者的抑郁和焦虑:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Psychiatry. 2020 Sep 1;77(9):906-914. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2020.1011.

引用本文的文献

1
Predictors and Correlates of Depression and Anxiety Symptom Trajectories in a Large Digital Mental Health Provider: Retrospective Analysis of Data From Rula Health.大型数字心理健康服务提供商中抑郁和焦虑症状轨迹的预测因素及相关因素:对鲁拉健康数据的回顾性分析
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Jul 25;27:e75750. doi: 10.2196/75750.
2
Personalized game-based digital intervention for relieving depression and anxiety symptoms: a pilot RCT.基于游戏的个性化数字干预缓解抑郁和焦虑症状:一项随机对照试验试点研究
Npj Ment Health Res. 2025 Jul 3;4(1):27. doi: 10.1038/s44184-025-00141-x.
3
The implementation of digital biomarkers in the diagnosis, treatment and monitoring of mood disorders: a narrative review.

本文引用的文献

1
An overview of and recommendations for more accessible digital mental health services.更易获取的数字心理健康服务概述与建议。
Nat Rev Psychol. 2022 Feb;1(2):87-100. doi: 10.1038/s44159-021-00003-1. Epub 2022 Jan 26.
2
The two-stage therapeutic effect of posture biofeedback training on back pain and the associated mechanism: A retrospective cohort study.姿势生物反馈训练对背痛的两阶段治疗效果及相关机制:一项回顾性队列研究。
Front Physiol. 2022 Dec 14;13:958033. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2022.958033. eCollection 2022.
3
Application of unified protocol as a transdiagnostic treatment for emotional disorders during COVID-19: An internet-delivered randomized controlled trial.
数字生物标志物在情绪障碍诊断、治疗和监测中的应用:一篇叙述性综述。
Front Digit Health. 2025 Jun 17;7:1595243. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2025.1595243. eCollection 2025.
4
Development of a Cohesive Predictive Model for Substance Use Disorder Rehabilitation Using Passive Digital Biomarkers, Psychological Assessments, and Automated Facial Emotion Recognition: Protocol for a Prospective Cohort Study.使用被动数字生物标志物、心理评估和自动面部情绪识别开发物质使用障碍康复的连贯预测模型:一项前瞻性队列研究方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2025 Jun 27;14:e71374. doi: 10.2196/71374.
5
It is Time to Realize the Promise of the Digital Mental Health Transformation: Application for Population Mental Health.是时候实现数字心理健康转型的前景了:应用于人群心理健康。
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Jun 19;27:e63791. doi: 10.2196/63791.
6
Home Environment as a Therapeutic Target for Prevention and Treatment of Chronic Diseases: Delivering Restorative Living Spaces, Patient Education and Self-Care by Bridging Biophilic Design, E-Commerce and Digital Health Technologies.家庭环境作为慢性病防治的治疗靶点:通过融合亲生物设计、电子商务和数字健康技术,提供恢复性居住空间、患者教育和自我护理。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2025 Feb 5;22(2):225. doi: 10.3390/ijerph22020225.
7
Digital Psychotherapies for Adults Experiencing Depressive Symptoms: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.成人抑郁症状的数字心理疗法:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JMIR Ment Health. 2024 Sep 30;11:e55500. doi: 10.2196/55500.
8
Digital Therapeutics for Improving Effectiveness of Pharmaceutical Drugs and Biological Products: Preclinical and Clinical Studies Supporting Development of Drug + Digital Combination Therapies for Chronic Diseases.用于提高药物和生物制品疗效的数字疗法:支持慢性病药物+数字联合疗法开发的临床前和临床研究
J Clin Med. 2024 Jan 11;13(2):403. doi: 10.3390/jcm13020403.
统一方案作为新冠疫情期间情绪障碍的跨诊断治疗方法的应用:一项基于互联网的随机对照试验。
World J Clin Cases. 2022 Aug 26;10(24):8599-8614. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i24.8599.
4
Digital therapeutics for mental health: Is attrition the Achilles heel?心理健康的数字疗法:损耗是其致命弱点吗?
Front Psychiatry. 2022 Aug 5;13:900615. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.900615. eCollection 2022.
5
Coaching to Support Mental Health Apps: Exploratory Narrative Review.支持心理健康应用程序的指导:探索性叙事综述
JMIR Hum Factors. 2022 Mar 8;9(1):e28301. doi: 10.2196/28301.
6
Blood Pressure Monitoring as a Digital Health Tool for Improving Diabetes Clinical Outcomes: Retrospective Real-world Study.血压监测作为改善糖尿病临床结局的数字健康工具:回顾性真实世界研究
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Feb 8;24(2):e32923. doi: 10.2196/32923.
7
Characteristics of Mobile Health Platforms for Depression and Anxiety: Content Analysis Through a Systematic Review of the Literature and Systematic Search of Two App Stores.移动心理健康平台的特点:通过系统综述文献和系统搜索两个应用商店的内容分析
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Feb 4;24(2):e27388. doi: 10.2196/27388.
8
A Novel Peer-to-Peer Coaching Program to Support Digital Mental Health: Design and Implementation.一种支持数字心理健康的新型点对点辅导计划:设计与实施
JMIR Ment Health. 2022 Jan 26;9(1):e32430. doi: 10.2196/32430.
9
A Digital Mental Health Intervention in an Orthopedic Setting for Patients With Symptoms of Depression and/or Anxiety: Feasibility Prospective Cohort Study.骨科环境中针对有抑郁和/或焦虑症状患者的数字心理健康干预:可行性前瞻性队列研究
JMIR Form Res. 2022 Feb 21;6(2):e34889. doi: 10.2196/34889.
10
Global, regional, and national burden of 12 mental disorders in 204 countries and territories, 1990-2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019.全球、区域和国家 204 个地区 1990-2019 年 12 种精神障碍疾病的负担:基于 2019 年全球疾病负担研究的系统分析。
Lancet Psychiatry. 2022 Feb;9(2):137-150. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(21)00395-3. Epub 2022 Jan 10.