Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Changi General Hospital, Singapore.
Duke-NUS Academic Clinical Program, SingHealth, Singapore.
Hepatol Commun. 2023 Sep 22;7(10). doi: 10.1097/HC9.0000000000000244. eCollection 2023 Oct 1.
Noninvasive tests, such as Fibrosis-4 (FIB-4), liver-stiffness measurement (LSM) by vibration-controlled transient elastography, and Fibroscan-AST (FAST), are frequently used for risk stratification in NAFLD. The comparative performance of FIB-4 and LSM and FAST to predict clinical outcomes of patients with NAFLD remained unclear. We aim to evaluate the performance of FIB-4, LSM, and FAST scores to predict clinical outcomes in patients with NAFLD.
We included consecutive adult patients with NAFLD with transient elastography performed between 2015 and 2022 from the United States and Singapore. Patients with NAFLD stratified based on baseline FIB-4, LSM, and FAST score were followed up until clinical outcomes notably liver-related events (LREs), LREs or death, death, and major adverse cardiac events.
A total of 1262 patients with NAFLD (63% with obesity and 37% with diabetes) with vibration-controlled transient elastography were followed up for median 3.5 years. FIB-4 stratified patients with NAFLD into low-risk (<1.3), intermediate-risk (1.3-2.67), and high-risk (>2.67) in 59.4%, 31.5%, and 9.1%, respectively. No LRE occurred with baseline FIB-4 <1.3, regardless of LSM and FAST score. Higher FIB-4 was associated with a higher risk of LREs within each LSM category. FIB-4 had a higher area under the received operating characteristic curve than LSM or FAST score to predict LRE.
In this multicenter international study, FIB-4 and LSM synergistically predicted the risk of LRE. In patients with FIB-4 <1.3, vibration-controlled transient elastography may incorrectly classify up to 10% of the patients as high risk. FIB-4 should be incorporated into risk stratification in NAFLD even among patients who underwent VCTE.
非侵入性检测,如纤维化-4 指数(FIB-4)、振动控制瞬时弹性成像(VCTE)的肝硬度测量(LSM)和 Fibroscan-AST(FAST),常用于非酒精性脂肪性肝病(NAFLD)的风险分层。FIB-4 和 LSM 以及 FAST 预测 NAFLD 患者临床结局的比较性能仍不清楚。我们旨在评估 FIB-4、LSM 和 FAST 评分预测 NAFLD 患者临床结局的性能。
我们纳入了 2015 年至 2022 年间在美国和新加坡进行 VCTE 的连续成年 NAFLD 患者。根据基线 FIB-4、LSM 和 FAST 评分对 NAFLD 患者进行分层,并对患者进行随访,直至发生显著的肝脏相关事件(LREs)、LREs 或死亡、死亡和主要不良心脏事件。
共纳入 1262 例 NAFLD 患者(63%肥胖,37%糖尿病),中位随访时间为 3.5 年。FIB-4 将 NAFLD 患者分为低危(<1.3)、中危(1.3-2.67)和高危(>2.67),分别占 59.4%、31.5%和 9.1%。无论 LSM 和 FAST 评分如何,基线 FIB-4<1.3 时均未发生 LRE。在每个 LSM 类别中,较高的 FIB-4 与更高的 LRE 风险相关。FIB-4 预测 LRE 的受试者工作特征曲线下面积高于 LSM 或 FAST 评分。
在这项多中心国际研究中,FIB-4 和 LSM 协同预测了 LRE 的风险。在 FIB-4<1.3 的患者中,VCTE 可能错误地将多达 10%的患者分类为高危。即使在接受 VCTE 的患者中,FIB-4 也应纳入 NAFLD 的风险分层。