Rahimi-Ardabily Arash, Murdande Sanjana, Dong Michael, Gu Katie W, Zhang Brianna, Miller Kendall, Aploks Krist, Da Dong Xiang
Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Nuvance Health, Whittingham Cancer Center, 34 Maple Street, Norwalk, CT, 06856, USA.
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2023 Sep 23;408(1):373. doi: 10.1007/s00423-023-03052-7.
Survival for gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) has been increasing over the years after the introduction of tyrosine kinase inhibitors. However, the role of metastasectomy for GIST is still controversial. Patients are currently treated with imatinib or sunitinib in case of imatinib failures as optimal medical therapy for metastatic GIST.
The Pubmed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library were systematically searched. Overall survival following liver resection ± tyrosine kinase inhibitor treatment for metastatic GIST was compared to treatment with tyrosine kinase inhibitors alone.
Eleven studies including both randomized control trials and retrospective cohort studies were included in the final analysis with a total of 988 patients. Seven studies encompassed data on 556 patients with isolated liver metastases (219 surgery ± drug groups and 337 drug-only groups) were included. Overall survival was significantly improved in patients undergoing liver resection ± drug therapy in comparison to drug therapy alone. [HR (95%CI) = 2.10 (1.58, 2.79); p<0.00001]. Subgroup analysis showed that patients also had improved progression free survival based on 4 studies. [HR (95%CI) = 1.92 (1.43, 2.56); p<0.00001]. In case of concurrent liver and peritoneal metastases, patients showed improved overall survival with aggressive surgical approaches based on 10 studies. [HR (95%CI) = 1.90 (1.56, 2.31); p<0.00001].
This meta-analysis found that liver resection for patients with metastatic GIST regardless of peritoneal metastases improved progression free and overall survival in conjunction with tyrosine kinase inhibitors as compared with medical therapy alone. Furthermore, liver resections did not have any immediate detrimental impact on survival in the group of patients selected.
自酪氨酸激酶抑制剂问世以来,胃肠道间质瘤(GIST)患者的生存率逐年提高。然而,GIST转移灶切除术的作用仍存在争议。目前,转移性GIST患者在伊马替尼治疗失败时会接受伊马替尼或舒尼替尼治疗,这是转移性GIST的最佳药物治疗方案。
系统检索了PubMed、EMBASE和Cochrane图书馆。将转移性GIST患者接受肝切除±酪氨酸激酶抑制剂治疗后的总生存率与单纯酪氨酸激酶抑制剂治疗的生存率进行了比较。
最终分析纳入了11项研究,包括随机对照试验和回顾性队列研究,共988例患者。其中7项研究纳入了556例孤立性肝转移患者的数据(219例手术±药物治疗组和337例单纯药物治疗组)。与单纯药物治疗相比,接受肝切除±药物治疗的患者总生存率显著提高。[风险比(95%置信区间)=2.10(1.58,2.79);p<0.00001]。亚组分析显示,根据4项研究,患者的无进展生存期也有所改善。[风险比(95%置信区间)=1.92(1.43,2.56);p<0.00001]。在同时存在肝转移和腹膜转移的情况下,根据10项研究,积极的手术方法可提高患者的总生存率。[风险比(95%置信区间)=1.90(1.56,2.31);p<0.00001]。
这项荟萃分析发现,与单纯药物治疗相比,转移性GIST患者无论有无腹膜转移,接受肝切除联合酪氨酸激酶抑制剂治疗可改善无进展生存期和总生存率。此外,肝切除术对所选患者组的生存没有任何直接的不利影响。